• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超早期阶段的临床干预是否有效?

Is clinical intervention in the ultra high risk phase effective?

机构信息

Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.

出版信息

Braz J Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;33 Suppl 2:s161-74. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462011000600004.

DOI:10.1590/s1516-44462011000600004
PMID:22286566
Abstract

Recent research suggests that early intervention in psychosis might improve the chances of recovery and may even be able to prevent the onset of psychotic disorders. Clinical intervention in subjects at ultra high risk (UHR) of psychosis can have three different objectives. The first aim is to improve the 'prodromal' symptoms and problems that subjects usually present with. The second is to reduce the risk of the subsequent onset of frank psychosis. The third objective is to minimize the delay before the initiation of antipsychotic treatment in the subgroup of UHR subjects that go on to develop a first episode of psychosis. Both pharmacological and psychological interventions appear to be effective in reducing the severity of presenting symptoms in UHR subjects. Clinical trials of the impact of these interventions on the risk of subsequent transition to psychosis have been positive, but have involved small samples, and thus the issue of whether the effects persist in the long term remains to be determined. The monitoring of UHR subjects for the first signs of frank psychosis is an effective means of reducing the delay between the onset of the first episode and the start of antipsychotic treatment. Follow-up studies are required to test whether the reduction in this delay leads to an improved long term outcome. To date, the majority of the interventions that have been used in UHR subjects, such as case management, antipsychotic medication, and cognitive behavior therapy have previously been employed in patients with established psychosis. However, it is possible that treatments that are not normally used in patients with psychotic disorders may prove effective when applied at this stage.

摘要

最近的研究表明,早期干预精神病可能会提高康复的机会,甚至可以预防精神病的发生。对处于精神病超高风险(UHR)的受试者进行临床干预可以有三个不同的目标。第一个目标是改善受试者通常出现的“前驱”症状和问题。第二个目标是降低随后出现明显精神病的风险。第三个目标是尽量减少随后发展为精神病首次发作的 UHR 受试者亚组开始使用抗精神病药物治疗的延迟。药物和心理干预似乎都能有效减轻 UHR 受试者出现的症状严重程度。这些干预措施对随后向精神病过渡的风险影响的临床试验是积极的,但涉及的样本较小,因此,这些效果是否能长期持续仍有待确定。监测 UHR 受试者出现明显精神病的最初迹象是减少首发症状和开始抗精神病治疗之间延迟的有效手段。需要进行随访研究,以检验这种延迟的减少是否会导致长期结果的改善。迄今为止,在 UHR 受试者中使用的大多数干预措施,如病例管理、抗精神病药物和认知行为疗法,以前都曾用于已确诊的精神病患者。然而,在这个阶段,通常不用于精神病患者的治疗方法也可能有效。

相似文献

1
Is clinical intervention in the ultra high risk phase effective?超早期阶段的临床干预是否有效?
Braz J Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;33 Suppl 2:s161-74. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462011000600004.
2
Early psychotic experiences: Interventions, problems and perspectives.早期精神病性体验:干预措施、问题与展望。
Psychiatriki. 2015 Jan-Mar;26(1):45-54.
3
Antipsychotic interventions in prodromal psychosis: safety issues.前驱期精神病的抗精神病干预:安全性问题。
CNS Drugs. 2013 Mar;27(3):197-205. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0046-1.
4
[Detection and early treatment of subjects at high risk of clinical psychosis: Definitions and recommendations].[临床精神病高风险受试者的检测与早期治疗:定义与建议]
Encephale. 2017 May;43(3):292-297. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
5
Challenges of assessment and treatment of ultra high risk for psychosis in an adolescent.青少年极高度精神病风险的评估和治疗挑战。
Psychiatr Danub. 2018 Jun;30(Suppl 4):166-168.
6
Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study.抗精神病药物与心理干预及两者联合用于首发精神病青少年(MAPS):一项多中心、三臂、随机对照试验性及可行性研究
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;7(9):788-800. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30248-0. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
7
Staged Treatment in Early Psychosis: A sequential multiple assignment randomised trial of interventions for ultra high risk of psychosis patients.分期治疗早期精神病:精神病超高危患者干预的序贯多项分配随机试验。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;12(3):292-306. doi: 10.1111/eip.12459. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
8
Rationale and baseline characteristics of PREVENT: a second-generation intervention trial in subjects at-risk (prodromal) of developing first-episode psychosis evaluating cognitive behavior therapy, aripiprazole, and placebo for the prevention of psychosis.预防研究的原理和基线特征:在首发精神病高危(前驱期)人群中进行的第二代干预试验,评估认知行为疗法、阿立哌唑和安慰剂预防精神病的效果。
Schizophr Bull. 2011 Sep;37 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S111-21. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr083.
9
Interventions for prodromal stage of psychosis.精神病前驱期的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 1;2019(11):CD012236. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012236.pub2.
10
Early psychosis detection program in Chile: A first step for the South American challenge in psychosis research.智利的早期精神病检测项目:应对南美洲精神病研究挑战的第一步。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;13(2):328-334. doi: 10.1111/eip.12766. Epub 2018 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Endophenotypes in Schizophrenia for the Perinatal Period: Criteria for Validation.精神分裂症围产期内表型:验证标准
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Jul;41(4):824-34. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv054. Epub 2015 May 4.