• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重采样 III 期数据以评估 II 期试验设计和终点。

Resampling phase III data to assess phase II trial designs and endpoints.

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Health Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Apr 15;18(8):2309-15. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1815. Epub 2012 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1815
PMID:22287601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3328614/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The best phase II design and endpoint for growth inhibitory agents is controversial. We simulated phase II trials by resampling patients from a positive (sorafenib vs. placebo; TARGET) and a negative (AE941 vs. placebo) phase III trial in metastatic renal cancer to compare the ability of various designs and endpoints to predict the known results.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A total of 770 and 259 patients from TARGET and the AE 941 trial, respectively, were resampled (5,000 replicates) to simulate phase II trials with α = 0.10 (one-sided). Designs/endpoints: single arm, two-stage with response rate (RR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; 37 patients); and randomized, two arm (20-35 patients per arm) with RR by RECIST, mean log ratio of tumor sizes (log ratio), progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 90 days (PFS-90), and overall PFS.

RESULTS

Single-arm trials were positive with RR by RECIST in 55% and 1% of replications for sorafenib and AE 941, respectively. Randomized trials versus placebo with 20 patients per arm were positive with RR by RECIST in 55% and 7%, log ratio in 88% and 25%, PFS-90 in 64% and 15%, and overall PFS in 69% and 9% of replications for sorafenib and AE 941, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the single-arm design and the randomized design comparing PFS, the randomized phase II design with the log ratio endpoint has greater power to predict the positive phase III result of sorafenib in renal cancer, but a higher false positive rate for the negative phase III result of AE 941.

摘要

目的

生长抑制因子的最佳 II 期设计和终点仍存在争议。我们通过从转移性肾细胞癌的一项阳性(索拉非尼对比安慰剂;TARGET)和一项阴性(AE941 对比安慰剂)III 期试验中重新抽样患者来模拟 II 期试验,比较各种设计和终点预测已知结果的能力。

实验设计

从 TARGET 和 AE 941 试验中分别重新抽取了 770 例和 259 例患者(5000 次重复),以模拟 II 期试验,α=0.10(单侧)。设计/终点:单臂,两阶段,以实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)的缓解率(RR)(37 例);以及随机、两臂(每臂 20-35 例),以 RECIST、肿瘤大小的平均对数比(log 比)、90 天无进展生存率(PFS-90)和总 PFS 的 RR。

结果

RR 为 RECIST 的单臂试验在索拉非尼和 AE 941 的 55%和 1%的重复中为阳性。RR 为 RECIST 的随机试验与安慰剂相比,每臂 20 例在索拉非尼和 AE 941 的 55%和 7%、log 比的 88%和 25%、PFS-90 的 64%和 15%以及总 PFS 的 69%和 9%的重复中为阳性。

结论

与单臂设计和比较 PFS 的随机设计相比,具有 log 比终点的随机 II 期设计预测索拉非尼在肾细胞癌中的阳性 III 期结果的能力更强,但对 AE 941 的阴性 III 期结果的假阳性率更高。

相似文献

1
Resampling phase III data to assess phase II trial designs and endpoints.重采样 III 期数据以评估 II 期试验设计和终点。
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Apr 15;18(8):2309-15. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1815. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
2
Choosing phase II endpoints and designs: evaluating the possibilities.选择 II 期终点和设计:评估可能性。
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Apr 15;18(8):2130-2. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0454. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
3
Sorafenib for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.索拉非尼用于治疗晚期肾细胞癌。
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Dec 15;12(24):7271-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1249.
4
Sorafenib [corrected] in kidney cancer.索拉非尼用于肾癌治疗。
Ann Oncol. 2007 Jul;18 Suppl 9:ix90-3. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm301.
5
Rationale and design of decision: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory, differentiated thyroid cancer.决策的理由和设计:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的 III 期临床试验,评估索拉非尼在局部晚期或转移性放射性碘(RAI)难治性分化型甲状腺癌患者中的疗效和安全性。
BMC Cancer. 2011 Aug 11;11:349. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-349.
6
AMG 386 in combination with sorafenib in patients with metastatic clear cell carcinoma of the kidney: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study.AMG 386 联合索拉非尼治疗转移性肾透明细胞癌患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、2 期研究。
Cancer. 2012 Dec 15;118(24):6152-61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27632. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
7
Carbonic anhydrase IX as a potential biomarker of efficacy in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma patients receiving sorafenib or placebo: analysis from the treatment approaches in renal cancer global evaluation trial (TARGET).碳酸酐酶 IX 作为转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌患者接受索拉非尼或安慰剂治疗疗效的潜在生物标志物:来自肾癌全球评估试验(TARGET)的治疗方法分析。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Nov;31(8):1788-93. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
8
Resampling the N9741 trial to compare tumor dynamic versus conventional end points in randomized phase II trials.重新抽样N9741试验,以比较随机II期试验中肿瘤动力学终点与传统终点。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):36-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2826. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
Comparative effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (AXIS): a randomised phase 3 trial.阿昔替尼对比索拉非尼用于晚期肾细胞癌的疗效(AXIS):一项随机 3 期试验。
Lancet. 2011 Dec 3;378(9807):1931-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61613-9. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
10
Tumor growth rate provides useful information to evaluate sorafenib and everolimus treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: an integrated analysis of the TARGET and RECORD phase 3 trial data.肿瘤生长率为评估索拉非尼和依维莫司治疗转移性肾细胞癌患者的疗效提供了有用信息:TARGET 和 RECORD Ⅲ期临床试验数据的综合分析。
Eur Urol. 2014 Apr;65(4):713-20. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Tumor Dynamic Model-Based Decision Support for Phase Ib/II Combination Studies: A Retrospective Assessment Based on Resampling of the Phase III Study IMpower150.基于肿瘤动态模型的 Ib/II 期联合研究决策支持:基于 III 期 IMpower150 研究的重采样回顾性评估。
Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Mar 14;29(6):1047-1055. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-2323.
2
Bayesian forecasting of tumor size metrics and overall survival.贝叶斯预测肿瘤大小指标和总生存期。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2022 Dec;11(12):1604-1613. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12869. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
3
Leveraging external data in the design and analysis of clinical trials in neuro-oncology.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of continuous versus categorical tumor measurement-based metrics to predict overall survival in cancer treatment trials.基于连续和分类肿瘤测量指标比较预测癌症治疗试验中的总生存期。
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Oct 15;17(20):6592-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0822. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
2
Prognostic factors and predictive models in renal cell carcinoma: a contemporary review.肾细胞癌的预后因素和预测模型:当代综述。
Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):644-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.041. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
3
Randomized phase II trials: a long-term investment with promising returns.
利用神经肿瘤学临床试验设计和分析中的外部数据。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Oct;22(10):e456-e465. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00488-5.
4
Meta-Analysis of Survival and Development of a Prognostic Nomogram for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Treated with Systemic Chemotherapy.接受全身化疗的恶性胸膜间皮瘤预后列线图生存与发展的Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 2;13(9):2186. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092186.
5
A Review of Perspectives on the Use of Randomization in Phase II Oncology Trials.随机化在肿瘤学 II 期临床试验应用的观点综述
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Dec 1;111(12):1255-1262. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz126.
6
To randomize, or not to randomize, that is the question: using data from prior clinical trials to guide future designs.随机化,还是不随机化,这是个问题:利用先前临床试验的数据来指导未来的设计。
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Oct 9;21(10):1239-1249. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz097.
7
Thalamic atrophy in multiple sclerosis: A magnetic resonance imaging marker of neurodegeneration throughout disease.多发性硬化症中的丘脑萎缩:疾病过程中神经退行性变的磁共振成像标志物。
Ann Neurol. 2018 Feb;83(2):223-234. doi: 10.1002/ana.25150. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
8
Clinical Utility of Metrics Based on Tumor Measurements in Phase II Trials to Predict Overall Survival Outcomes in Phase III Trials by Using Resampling Methods.基于II期试验中肿瘤测量指标,采用重采样方法预测III期试验总生存结局的临床效用。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 1;33(34):4048-57. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8778. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
9
Rational Clinical Experiment: Assessing Prior Probability and Its Impact on the Success of Phase II Clinical Trials.合理临床实验:评估先验概率及其对II期临床试验成功的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 10;33(26):2914-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.4362. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
10
The power of phase II end-points for different possible mechanisms of action of an experimental treatment.II期终点对于实验性治疗不同可能作用机制的效力。
Eur J Cancer. 2015 May;51(8):984-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
随机二期临床试验:一项具有广阔前景的长期投资。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jul 20;103(14):1093-100. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr218. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
4
Analysis of tumor burden versus progression-free survival for Phase II decision making.肿瘤负担与无进展生存期分析用于 II 期决策。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May;32(3):446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Jan 23.
5
Analysis of the yield of phase II combination therapy trials in medical oncology.医学肿瘤学中 II 期联合治疗试验的产量分析。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Nov 1;16(21):5296-302. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0669. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
6
Randomized phase II trials: inevitable or inadvisable?随机II期试验:不可避免还是不可取?
J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 20;28(15):2641-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3343. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
7
The design of phase II clinical trials testing cancer therapeutics: consensus recommendations from the clinical trial design task force of the national cancer institute investigational drug steering committee.评估癌症治疗药物的 II 期临床试验设计:美国国家癌症研究所试验药物指导委员会临床试验设计工作组的共识建议。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Mar 15;16(6):1764-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3287. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
8
Comparison of error rates in single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.单臂与随机化 II 期癌症临床试验中错误率的比较。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1936-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.5489. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
9
Model-based prediction of phase III overall survival in colorectal cancer on the basis of phase II tumor dynamics.基于II期肿瘤动力学的结直肠癌III期总生存的模型预测
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 1;27(25):4103-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.0807. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
10
Phase II trials in journal of clinical oncology.发表于《临床肿瘤学杂志》的II期试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 1;27(19):3073-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1811. Epub 2009 May 18.