The Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Cancer. 2012 Dec 15;118(24):6152-61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27632. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
This study evaluated the tolerability and antitumor activity of AMG 386, a peptibody (a peptide Fc fusion) that neutralizes the interaction of angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 with Tie2 (tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin-like and EGF-like domains 2), plus sorafenib in patients with clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in a randomized controlled study.
Previously untreated patients with mRCC were randomized 1:1:1 to receive sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily plus intravenous AMG 386 at 10 mg/kg (arm A) or 3 mg/kg (arm B) or placebo (arm C) once weekly (qw). Patients in arm C could receive open-label AMG 386 at 10 mg/kg qw plus sorafenib following disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
A total of 152 patients were randomized. Median PFS was 9.0, 8.5, and 9.0 months in arms A, B, and C, respectively (hazard ratio for arms A and B vs arm C, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-1.30; P = .523). The objective response rate (95% CI) for arms A, B, and C, respectively, was 38% (25%-53%), 37% (24%-52%), and 25% (14%-40%). Among 30 patients in arm C who had disease progression and subsequently received open-label AMG 386 at 10 mg/kg qw, the objective response rate was 3% (95% CI, 0%-17%). Frequently occurring adverse events (AEs) included diarrhea (arms A/B/C, 70%/67%/56%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (52%/47%/54%), alopecia (50%/45%/50%), and hypertension (42%/49%/46%). Fifteen patients had grade 4 AEs (arms A/B/C, n = 3/7/5); 4 had fatal AEs (n = 2/1/1), with 1 (abdominal pain, arm B) considered possibly related to AMG 386.
In patients with mRCC, AMG 386 plus sorafenib was tolerable but did not significantly improve PFS compared with placebo plus sorafenib.
本研究评估了 AMG 386(一种与 Tie2(含免疫球蛋白样和表皮生长因子样结构域的酪氨酸激酶 2)结合的血管生成素-1 和血管生成素-2 的肽-Fc 融合物)联合索拉非尼在透明细胞转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者中的耐受性和抗肿瘤活性,这是一项随机对照研究。
未经治疗的 mRCC 患者按 1:1:1 的比例随机分为三组,分别接受索拉非尼 400mg 每日两次口服联合 AMG 386 10mg/kg(A 组)或 3mg/kg(B 组)或安慰剂(C 组)每周一次静脉输注。C 组患者在疾病进展后可接受开放标签 AMG 386 10mg/kg 每周一次联合索拉非尼治疗。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。
共 152 例患者随机分组。A 组、B 组和 C 组的中位 PFS 分别为 9.0、8.5 和 9.0 个月(A 组和 B 组与 C 组相比,风险比为 0.88;95%置信区间[CI],0.60-1.30;P=0.523)。A 组、B 组和 C 组的客观缓解率(95%CI)分别为 38%(25%-53%)、37%(24%-52%)和 25%(14%-40%)。在 C 组的 30 例疾病进展后接受开放标签 AMG 386 10mg/kg 每周一次治疗的患者中,客观缓解率为 3%(95%CI,0%-17%)。常见不良事件(AEs)包括腹泻(A 组/B 组/C 组,70%/67%/56%)、手足综合征(52%/47%/54%)、脱发(50%/45%/50%)和高血压(42%/49%/46%)。15 例患者出现 4 级不良事件(A 组/B 组/C 组,n=3/7/5);4 例患者出现致命不良事件(n=2/1/1),其中 1 例(腹痛,B 组)可能与 AMG 386 相关。
在 mRCC 患者中,AMG 386 联合索拉非尼耐受性良好,但与安慰剂联合索拉非尼相比,并未显著改善 PFS。