• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌肝转移的外科治疗意义。

Significance of surgical treatment of liver metastases from gastric cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Osaka National Hospital. 2-1-14, Hoenzaka, Chuo-ku, Osaka 540-0006, Japan.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2012 Feb;32(2):665-70.

PMID:22287760
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The optimal treatment of liver metastases from gastric cancer (LMGC) remains uncertain. We retrospectively compared surgical treatment with chemotherapy alone and identified prognostic determinants.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the records of 50 consecutive patients with LMGC: 25 patients with gastrectomy plus hepatic resection (group A), 13 patients with palliative gastrectomy (group B), and 12 patients with chemotherapy alone (group C). We compared the overall survival among these three groups, and assessed prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Median survival time in groups A, B, and C was 33.4, 10.5, and 8.7 months, respectively. Univariate analysis found T stage, number of liver metastases, and treatment group to be significant prognostic factors. In the multivariate analysis, T stage was shown to be an independent prognostic determinant, while gastrectomy plus hepatic resection was of marginal significance compared with chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSION

T Stage was a significant prognostic determinant, and gastrectomy plus hepatic resection could be a promising treatment for patients with LMGC.

摘要

背景/目的:胃癌肝转移(LMGC)的最佳治疗方法仍不确定。我们回顾性比较了单纯手术治疗与化疗,并确定了预后决定因素。

患者和方法

我们回顾了 50 例连续 LMGC 患者的记录:25 例接受胃切除术加肝切除术(A 组),13 例接受姑息性胃切除术(B 组),12 例接受单纯化疗(C 组)。我们比较了这三组的总生存率,并评估了预后因素。

结果

A、B 和 C 组的中位生存时间分别为 33.4、10.5 和 8.7 个月。单因素分析发现 T 分期、肝转移数量和治疗组是显著的预后因素。多因素分析显示 T 分期是独立的预后决定因素,而胃切除术加肝切除术与单纯化疗相比具有边缘意义。

结论

T 分期是一个显著的预后决定因素,胃切除术加肝切除术可能是 LMGC 患者有希望的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Significance of surgical treatment of liver metastases from gastric cancer.胃癌肝转移的外科治疗意义。
Anticancer Res. 2012 Feb;32(2):665-70.
2
Predictive factors improving survival after gastric and hepatic surgical treatment in gastric cancer patients with synchronous liver metastases.预测因素可改善胃癌合并同步肝转移患者行胃和肝外科治疗后的生存。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Jan;125(2):165-71.
3
Prognostic factors in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated by noncurative resection: a multivariate analysis.非根治性切除治疗的晚期胃癌患者的预后因素:多变量分析
Hepatogastroenterology. 2001 Sep-Oct;48(41):1504-8.
4
Prognostic studies on gastric cancer with concomitant liver metastases.伴有肝转移的胃癌的预后研究。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2001 May-Jun;48(39):892-4.
5
[Clinicopathological analysis of synchronous liver metastasis in gastric cancer and evaluation of surgical outcomes].[胃癌同期肝转移的临床病理分析及手术疗效评估]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Mar;9(2):127-30.
6
Surgical resection of liver metastases of gastric cancer: an analysis of a 17-year experience with 22 patients.胃癌肝转移的手术切除:22例患者17年经验分析
Surgery. 2003 May;133(5):507-11. doi: 10.1067/msy.2003.147.
7
Significance of palliative gastrectomy for late-stage gastric cancer patients.晚期胃癌患者行姑息性胃切除术的意义。
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;106(7):862-71. doi: 10.1002/jso.23158. Epub 2012 May 30.
8
Indication for hepatic resection in the treatment of liver metastasis from gastric cancer.胃癌肝转移的肝切除术适应证。
Anticancer Res. 2010 Jun;30(6):2367-76.
9
Survival of gastric cancer with concomitant liver metastases.伴有肝转移的胃癌的生存情况
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Sep-Oct;51(59):1527-30.
10
Clinicopathological features and outcome of hepatic resection for liver metastasis from gastric cancer.胃癌肝转移肝切除的临床病理特征及预后
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Jul-Aug;49(46):1062-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive and Comparative Review of Global Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines: 2024 Update.《全球胃癌治疗指南综合与比较性综述:2024年更新》
J Gastric Cancer. 2025 Jan;25(1):153-176. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e10.
2
Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline).《2024年韩国胃癌诊疗指南:基于证据的多学科方法(2022年指南更新)》
J Gastric Cancer. 2025 Jan;25(1):5-114. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e11.
3
Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach.
《2022年韩国胃癌诊疗指南:基于证据的多学科方法》
J Gastric Cancer. 2023 Jan;23(1):3-106. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e11.
4
Identifying Optimal Surgical Intervention-Based Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Patients With Liver Metastases.确定针对伴有肝转移的胃癌患者的基于最佳手术干预的化疗方案。
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 29;11:675870. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.675870. eCollection 2021.
5
Prospective Multicenter Interventional Study of Surgical Resection for Liver Metastasis from Gastric Cancer: R0 Resection Rate, and Operative Morbidity and Mortality.前瞻性多中心胃癌肝转移手术切除研究:R0 切除率、手术并发症发生率和死亡率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb;29(2):924-932. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10750-3. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
6
Efficacy of Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factors.手术治疗胃癌肝转移的疗效:文献系统评价及预后因素的Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 9;10(5):1141. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051141.
7
Peri-operative Outcomes and Survival Following Palliative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.胃癌姑息性胃切除术后的围手术期结局与生存:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2021 Mar;52(1):41-56. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00519-4. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
8
Is there a role for treatment-oriented surgery in liver metastases from gastric cancer?以治疗为导向的手术在胃癌肝转移中是否有作用?
World J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul 24;11(7):477-494. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i7.477.
9
Chinese consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer with liver metastases.《中国胃癌肝转移诊断与治疗共识》
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 Feb 20;12:1758835920904803. doi: 10.1177/1758835920904803. eCollection 2020.
10
Surgery Strategies for Gastric Cancer With Liver Metastasis.伴有肝转移的胃癌手术策略
Front Oncol. 2019 Dec 6;9:1353. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01353. eCollection 2019.