Niu W Z, Engwall M J, Bisgard G E
Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1990 Aug;69(2):734-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1990.69.2.734.
Twenty-nine single carotid body chemoreceptor units recorded during normocapnic normoxia from 20 anesthetized goats were classified into two groups by discharge pattern. Thirteen fibers, which had interspike interval distributions with a prominent peak [24.0 +/- 9.8% (SD)] at 0- to 20-ms bin, were termed bursting fibers (BF). The 16 remaining fibers were termed nonbursting fibers (NBF); these had no notable peak in the interval distributions. During hypoxia and hypercapnia, the chemoreceptor fibers continued to discharge in their established patterns. The interval distribution of most NBF spike trains could be described with the Poisson process, but none of the BF could be. However, except for the intervals in the range of 0-20 ms, the interval distribution of the BF could be described as exponential. This study suggests that 1) there are two distinct populations of the goat chemoreceptor fiber, each with an inherent discharge pattern; 2) the chemoreceptor did not code information about arterial PO2 and PCO2 in different patterns; and 3) the basic chemotransduction mechanism is likely the same in BF and NBF, and the difference in discharge pattern is more likely to reflect processes downstream from the transducer.
在正常二氧化碳分压和常氧条件下,从20只麻醉山羊记录到的29个单颈动脉体化学感受性单位,根据放电模式分为两组。13根纤维在0至20毫秒的时间间隔分布中有一个突出的峰值[24.0±9.8%(标准差)],被称为爆发性纤维(BF)。其余16根纤维被称为非爆发性纤维(NBF);它们在间隔分布中没有明显的峰值。在低氧和高碳酸血症期间,化学感受性纤维继续以其既定模式放电。大多数NBF放电序列的间隔分布可以用泊松过程来描述,但BF均不能。然而,除了0至20毫秒范围内的间隔外,BF的间隔分布可以描述为指数分布。本研究表明:1)山羊化学感受性纤维存在两个不同的群体,每个群体都有其固有的放电模式;2)化学感受器并非以不同模式编码有关动脉血氧分压和二氧化碳分压的信息;3)BF和NBF的基本化学转导机制可能相同,放电模式的差异更可能反映换能器下游的过程。