• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗效果不佳时转换方案后多发性硬化症的临床活动变化。

Change in the clinical activity of multiple sclerosis after treatment switch for suboptimal response.

机构信息

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Barcelona. Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Neurol. 2012 Jun;19(6):899-904. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03648.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03648.x
PMID:22289050
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS) has a partial efficacy, and a significant proportion of treated patients will develop a suboptimal response with first-line disease-modifying drugs (DMD). Therapy switch in patients with MS can be a strategy after a treatment failure. We studied the change in clinical activity after switching of first-line DMD because of a treatment failure.

METHODS

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with interferon-beta (IFNB) or glatiramer acetate (GA) were divided into (i) patients without change in DMD, (ii) patients with a change in DMD because of a poor response, and (iii) those with a change in DMD without relation with response. Annualized relapse rate (ARR) and relapse-free proportions were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 923 patients with RRMS. Of the 180 who experienced a change because of suboptimal response, 90 switched to another first-line DMT, 38 to mitoxantrone, and 52 to natalizumab. Median ARR in the pre-DMD period on first DMD and second DMD was the following: 1, 1, and 0 for switchers from IFNB to another IFNB (P = 0.0001); 0.67, 1, and 0 for switchers from GA to IFNB (P = 0.01); 1, 1, and 0 for switchers from an IFNB to GA (P = 0.02); 1.1, 1.5, 0.2 for switchers from IFNB or GA to mitoxantrone (P = 0.0001); 0.9, 1, 0 for switchers from IFNB or GA to natalizumab (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with RRMS who have a poor response, switch to another DMD may reduce the clinical activity of the disease.

摘要

背景

多发性硬化症(MS)的治疗具有部分疗效,相当一部分接受治疗的患者在使用一线疾病修正药物(DMD)后会出现治疗效果不理想的情况。MS 患者的治疗转换可以是治疗失败后的一种策略。我们研究了因治疗失败而转换一线 DMD 后的临床活动变化。

方法

接受干扰素-β(IFNB)或聚甘酯(GA)治疗的复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者分为(i)DMD 未改变的患者,(ii)因治疗反应不佳而改变 DMD 的患者,和(iii)与反应无关而改变 DMD 的患者。分析了年复发率(ARR)和无复发比例。

结果

我们确定了 923 例 RRMS 患者。在 180 例因治疗效果不理想而改变治疗的患者中,90 例患者改用另一种一线 DMT,38 例患者改用米托蒽醌,52 例患者改用那他珠单抗。在首次 DMD 和第二次 DMD 的预 DMD 期间,ARR 的中位数为:1、1 和 0 ,IFNB 转为另一种 IFNB 的患者(P=0.0001);0.67、1 和 0,GA 转为 IFNB 的患者(P=0.01);1、1 和 0,IFNB 转为 GA 的患者(P=0.02);1.1、1.5 和 0.2,IFNB 或 GA 转为米托蒽醌的患者(P=0.0001);0.9、1 和 0,IFNB 或 GA 转为那他珠单抗的患者(P=0.0001)。

结论

在治疗反应不佳的 RRMS 患者中,转为另一种 DMD 可能会降低疾病的临床活动。

相似文献

1
Change in the clinical activity of multiple sclerosis after treatment switch for suboptimal response.治疗效果不佳时转换方案后多发性硬化症的临床活动变化。
Eur J Neurol. 2012 Jun;19(6):899-904. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03648.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
2
Switching first-line disease-modifying therapy after failure: impact on the course of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.一线疾病修饰治疗失败后换药:对复发缓解型多发性硬化病程的影响
Mult Scler. 2009 Jan;15(1):50-8. doi: 10.1177/1352458508096687. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
3
Therapeutic outcome 3 years after switching of immunomodulatory therapies in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Argentina.阿根廷复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者免疫调节治疗转换3年后的治疗结果
Eur J Neurol. 2008 Apr;15(4):386-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02071.x.
4
Treatment patterns in disease-modifying therapy for patients with multiple sclerosis in the United States.美国多发性硬化症患者在疾病修正治疗中的治疗模式。
Clin Ther. 2013 Oct;35(10):1501-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.07.330.
5
Efficacy of natalizumab in second line therapy of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from a multi-center study in German speaking countries.那他珠单抗二线治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的疗效:一项多中心德语国家研究结果。
Eur J Neurol. 2010 Jan;17(1):31-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02728.x. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
6
Clinical course after change of immunomodulating therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.复发缓解型多发性硬化症免疫调节治疗变更后的临床病程
Eur J Neurol. 2006 May;13(5):471-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01273.x.
7
Treatment options for patients with multiple sclerosis who have a suboptimal response to interferon-β therapy.多发性硬化症患者对干扰素-β治疗反应不佳的治疗选择。
Eur J Neurol. 2014 Mar;21(3):377-87, e18-20. doi: 10.1111/ene.12299. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
8
Different responses to interferon beta-1b treatment in patients with neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis.视神经脊髓炎和多发性硬化患者对干扰素 β-1b 治疗的不同反应。
Eur J Neurol. 2010 May;17(5):672-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02897.x. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
9
Escalation to natalizumab or switching among immunomodulators in relapsing multiple sclerosis.在复发型多发性硬化症中,升级为那他珠单抗或在免疫调节剂之间转换。
Mult Scler. 2012 Jan;18(1):64-71. doi: 10.1177/1352458511417481. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
10
Clinical response to interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis patients: a Brazilian cohort.巴西队列中多发性硬化症患者对β-干扰素和醋酸格拉替雷的临床反应。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012 Oct;70(10):774-9. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2012001000005.

引用本文的文献

1
No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) as a Clinical Assessment Tool for Multiple Sclerosis: Clinician and Patient Perspectives [Narrative Review].无疾病活动证据(NEDA)作为多发性硬化症的临床评估工具:临床医生和患者视角[叙述性综述]
Neurol Ther. 2023 Dec;12(6):1909-1935. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00549-7. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
2
Assessing the Health Economic Outcomes from Commercially Insured Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Patients Who Switched from Other Disease-Modifying Therapies to Teriflunomide, in the United States.在美国,评估从其他疾病修正疗法转换为特立氟胺的商业保险复发型多发性硬化症患者的健康经济结果。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 May 20;15:361-373. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S401687. eCollection 2023.
3
The protective role of breastfeeding in multiple sclerosis: Latest evidence and practical considerations.
母乳喂养在多发性硬化症中的保护作用:最新证据与实际考量
Front Neurol. 2023 Jan 24;13:1090133. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1090133. eCollection 2022.
4
Blood Metabolomics May Discriminate a Sub-Group of Patients with First Demyelinating Episode in the Context of RRMS with Increased Disability and MRI Characteristics Indicative of Poor Prognosis.血液代谢组学可能在 RRMS 中鉴别出一组残疾加重和 MRI 特征提示预后不良的首发脱髓鞘患者亚群。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 23;23(23):14578. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314578.
5
Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Consensus Group (MSTCG): position statement on disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (white paper).多发性硬化治疗共识小组(MSTCG):关于多发性硬化疾病修正疗法的立场声明(白皮书)
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021 Aug 18;14:17562864211039648. doi: 10.1177/17562864211039648. eCollection 2021.
6
[Multiple sclerosis treatment consensus group (MSTCG): position paper on disease-modifying treatment of multiple sclerosis 2021 (white paper)].[多发性硬化治疗共识小组(MSTCG):2021年多发性硬化疾病修正治疗立场文件(白皮书)]
Nervenarzt. 2021 Aug;92(8):773-801. doi: 10.1007/s00115-021-01157-2. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
7
Therapeutic Outcome of Alemtuzumab in Korean Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: 2-Year Follow-Up.阿仑单抗治疗韩国多发性硬化症患者的疗效:2年随访
J Clin Neurol. 2019 Jul;15(3):328-333. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2019.15.3.328.
8
Changes in the Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Paradigm. What Do We Do Now and What Were We Doing Before?多发性硬化症治疗模式的变化。我们现在在做什么,之前又在做什么?
J Clin Neurol. 2018 Oct;14(4):487-491. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2018.14.4.487. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
9
Alemtuzumab CARE-MS II 5-year follow-up: Efficacy and safety findings.阿仑单抗治疗复发型多发性硬化症(CARE-MS II)5年随访:疗效与安全性结果
Neurology. 2017 Sep 12;89(11):1117-1126. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004354. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
10
Current and Emerging Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Implications for the Radiologist, Part 2-Surveillance for Treatment Complications and Disease Progression.多发性硬化症的当前和新兴治疗方法:对放射科医生的影响,第 2 部分-监测治疗并发症和疾病进展。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Sep;38(9):1672-1680. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5148. Epub 2017 Apr 20.