• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使老年学专业化:为何老年学高等教育认证委员会必须认证老年学专业项目。

Professionalizing gerontology: why AGHE must accredit gerontology programs.

作者信息

Pelham Anabel, Schafer Donna, Abbott Pauline, Estes Carroll

机构信息

Gerontology Program, School of Social Work, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132, USA.

出版信息

Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2012;33(1):6-19. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2012.638348.

DOI:10.1080/02701960.2012.638348
PMID:22289063
Abstract

The aging of society requires more trained aging specialists. Are higher education institutions prepared? Results of a comparison of gerontology programs in 2000 and 2010 indicate that the number of programs has declined and that higher education is not prepared. To address this challenge, the authors propose that gerontology be professionalized. To do so will require the accreditation of gerontology programs, the credentialing of gerontology graduates, and the employment of professional gerontologists. The authors offer a model that describes these relationships. The authors make the case, using a symbolic interactionist approach, that the Association for Gerontology in Higher Education must accredit gerontology programs.

摘要

社会老龄化需要更多训练有素的老龄问题专家。高等教育机构准备好了吗?2000年和2010年老年学项目比较结果表明,项目数量有所下降,高等教育并未做好准备。为应对这一挑战,作者提议将老年学专业化。这样做将需要对老年学项目进行认证,对老年学专业毕业生进行资格认定,并雇佣专业老年学专家。作者提供了一个描述这些关系的模型。作者采用符号互动主义方法论证,高等教育老年学协会必须对老年学项目进行认证。

相似文献

1
Professionalizing gerontology: why AGHE must accredit gerontology programs.使老年学专业化:为何老年学高等教育认证委员会必须认证老年学专业项目。
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2012;33(1):6-19. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2012.638348.
2
Is gerontology ready for accreditation?
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2012;33(1):20-38. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2011.640729.
3
Accreditation of gerontology programs: a look from inside.老年医学项目认证:内部视角
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2012;33(1):87-94. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2012.639102.
4
Gerontology required core courses and gerontology academic program success.
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2005;25(3):31-48. doi: 10.1300/J021v25n03_03.
5
What should gerontology learn from health education accreditation?老年医学应该从健康教育认证中学到什么?
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2012;33(1):75-86. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2012.639104.
6
Accreditation in the profession of psychology: a cautionary tale.心理学专业的认证:一个警示故事。
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2012;33(1):55-74. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2012.640728.
7
Workforce training and education gaps in gerontology and geriatrics: what we found in New York State.老年医学领域的劳动力培训与教育差距:我们在纽约州的发现。
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2010;31(4):328-48. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2010.532749.
8
Progress and challenges in graduate education in gerontology: the U.S. Experience.老年医学研究生教育的进展与挑战:美国的经验
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2007;27(3):11-26. doi: 10.1300/J021v27n03_02.
9
Promoting the development of professional identity of gerontologists: an academic/experiential learning model.促进老年医学专家职业认同感的发展:一种学术/体验式学习模式。
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2013;34(2):176-96. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2012.718008. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
10
Health professions education: Advancing geriatrics and gerontology competencies through Age-Friendly University (AFU) Principles.卫生专业教育:通过友善老年大学(AFU)原则提升老年医学和老年学能力。
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2019 Apr-Jun;40(2):194-202. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2019.1576658. Epub 2019 Feb 12.