• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜结直肠手术是否随着时间的推移变得更具成本效益?

Has laparoscopic colorectal surgery become more cost-effective over time?

机构信息

Medical Student - School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jul;27(7):855-60. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1410-1. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-012-1410-1
PMID:22290571
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have confirmed that laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) has superior short-term outcomes when compared to open colorectal surgery. However, the evidence for cost-effectiveness of LCS is less clear.

AIM

The aim of this study is to explore the cost-effectiveness of LCS over time since it was first developed in 1991.

METHODS

Systematic review of the literature was conducted. Electronic databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar) were searched for studies from 1991 to 2010 using the keywords "laparoscopic, colorectal surgery cost, economic evaluation".

RESULTS

Fifteen economic evaluations met the inclusion criteria. The percentage cost difference between open and laparoscopic surgery varied widely between different studies. The general trend when observing all the included economic evaluations is that there is a moderate negative correlation between progression of time and the size of the cost gap between laparoscopic and open surgery (R-value=-0.44). This correlation is even stronger (R-value=-0.64, P=0.046) if the studies are subdivided by the country where the surgery was carried out in. Western healthcare systems, even though they had a heterogeneous set of results (SD=27%), showed a decline in costs of laparoscopic surgery with time.

CONCLUSION

From the current trends, it is projected that the results of future economic evaluations will unequivocally show that laparoscopic surgery is cheaper than open surgery. The initial higher costs of laparoscopic surgery training may be worth the savings made in the long term if it is practised in settings where postoperative care is expensive.

摘要

背景

多项研究证实,腹腔镜结直肠手术(LCS)在短期疗效方面优于开腹结直肠手术。然而,关于 LCS 的成本效益的证据尚不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在探讨自 1991 年首次开展 LCS 以来,其成本效益随时间的变化情况。

方法

对文献进行系统评价。使用“腹腔镜、结直肠手术成本、经济评估”等关键词,在电子数据库(PubMed、ScienceDirect 和 Google Scholar)中检索 1991 年至 2010 年的研究。

结果

符合纳入标准的经济评价有 15 项。开放手术和腹腔镜手术之间的成本差异百分比在不同研究中差异很大。观察所有纳入的经济评价的总体趋势是,随着时间的推移,腹腔镜手术和开放手术之间的成本差距呈中度负相关(R 值=-0.44)。如果按手术所在国家对研究进行细分,这种相关性更强(R 值=-0.64,P=0.046)。即使结果存在异质性(标准差=27%),西方医疗体系的腹腔镜手术成本也随着时间的推移呈下降趋势。

结论

从目前的趋势来看,可以预计未来的经济评价结果将明确表明腹腔镜手术比开放手术更便宜。如果在术后护理费用较高的环境中开展腹腔镜手术,那么初期腹腔镜手术培训的较高成本从长远来看可能是值得的。

相似文献

1
Has laparoscopic colorectal surgery become more cost-effective over time?腹腔镜结直肠手术是否随着时间的推移变得更具成本效益?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jul;27(7):855-60. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1410-1. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
2
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
3
Cost-utility analysis of the insufflation of warmed humidified carbon dioxide during open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.开放和腹腔镜结直肠手术中温热加湿二氧化碳气腹的成本效用分析
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Feb;17(1):99-107. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1270759. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
4
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
5
Quality of life in the first 6 weeks following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery.腹腔镜和开腹结直肠手术后 6 周内的生活质量。
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.11.005.
6
A National study on the adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly population: current state and value proposition.一项关于腹腔镜结直肠手术在老年人群中应用的全国性研究:现状和价值主张。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Oct;23(10):965-972. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02082-y. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
7
Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic vs open resection for colon and rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌切除术的成本效益比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Oct;55(10):1017-23. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182656898.
8
Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial.腹腔镜与开放结直肠手术:单中心随机试验中的成本效益分析
Ann Surg. 2005 Dec;242(6):890-5, discussion 895-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000189573.23744.59.
9
Laparoscopic colectomy is cheaper than conventional open resection.腹腔镜结肠切除术比传统的开放切除术费用更低。
Colorectal Dis. 2007 Nov;9(9):819-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01221.x. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
10
Economic evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌腹腔镜手术的经济学评估
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Fall;23(4):464-72. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307070559.

引用本文的文献

1
Regional variations and deprivation are linked to poorer access to laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery: a national study in England.区域差异和贫困与腹腔镜和机器人结直肠手术的较差可及性相关:英格兰的一项全国性研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Dec 11;28(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02874-3.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy: a comparative study of short-term economic and clinical outcomes.机器人与腹腔镜直肠切除术:短期经济和临床结局的比较研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jun 7;38(1):161. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04446-1.
3
Education and Training in Transanal Endoscopic Surgery and Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopically assisted vs. open elective colonic and rectal resection: a comparison of outcomes in English National Health Service Trusts between 1996 and 2006.腹腔镜辅助与开腹择期结直肠切除术:1996 年至 2006 年英国国民保健制度信托机构的结果比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Oct;52(10):1695-704. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181b55254.
2
Is laparoscopic colectomy as cost beneficial as open colectomy?腹腔镜结肠切除术与开腹结肠切除术在成本效益方面是否相当?
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Apr;79(4):265-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04857.x.
3
Systematic review of economic evaluations of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.
经肛门内镜手术及经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的教育与培训
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021 May;34(3):163-171. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718682. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
4
A National study on the adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly population: current state and value proposition.一项关于腹腔镜结直肠手术在老年人群中应用的全国性研究:现状和价值主张。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Oct;23(10):965-972. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02082-y. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
5
A new perspective on the value of minimally invasive colorectal surgery-payer, provider, and patient benefits.微创结直肠手术价值的新视角——支付方、医疗服务提供者及患者的益处
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2846-2853. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5295-x. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
6
Real-world cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy versus open colectomy for colon cancer: a nationwide population-based study.腹腔镜手术与开腹结肠切除术治疗结肠癌的真实世界成本效益:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1796-1805. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5176-3. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
7
A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.开放与腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的临床及经济结局的全国性评估。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4220-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4732-6. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
8
The current status of emergent laparoscopic colectomy: a population-based study of clinical and financial outcomes.急诊腹腔镜结肠切除术的现状:一项基于人群的临床和财务结果研究。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3321-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4605-z. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
9
Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence.机器人结直肠手术:当前证据总结。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jan;29(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1764-z. Epub 2013 Sep 1.
10
Optimizing cost and short-term outcomes for elderly patients in laparoscopic colonic surgery.优化老年患者腹腔镜结肠手术的成本和短期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4463-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3088-z. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
结直肠癌腹腔镜手术经济评估的系统评价
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Nov;10(9):859-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01609.x. Epub 2008 Jul 14.
4
Predictive factors for conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Tech Coloproctol. 2008 Mar;12(1):27-31. doi: 10.1007/s10151-008-0394-x. Epub 2008 May 30.
5
Economics and the laparoscopic surgery learning curve: comparison with open surgery for rectosigmoid cancer.经济学与腹腔镜手术学习曲线:与乙状结肠癌开放手术的比较
World J Surg. 2007 Sep;31(9):1827-1834. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9154-8.
6
Laparoscopic colectomy is cheaper than conventional open resection.腹腔镜结肠切除术比传统的开放切除术费用更低。
Colorectal Dis. 2007 Nov;9(9):819-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01221.x. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
7
Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜辅助与开放性结肠癌切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;142(3):298-303. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.3.298.
8
Economic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in Korea.韩国腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌的经济结果
Surg Today. 2007;37(2):127-32. doi: 10.1007/s00595-006-3356-9. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
9
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
10
Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.在强化康复计划中比较腹腔镜手术和开放手术治疗结直肠癌的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2006 Mar;93(3):300-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5216.