• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cethromycin versus clarithromycin for community-acquired pneumonia: comparative efficacy and safety outcomes from two double-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter, multinational noninferiority studies.西他霉素与克拉霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎的比较:来自两项双盲、随机、平行分组、多中心、跨国非劣效性研究的疗效和安全性结果。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Apr;56(4):2037-47. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05596-11. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily oral telithromycin compared with clarithromycin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.与克拉霉素相比,每日一次口服泰利霉素治疗成人社区获得性肺炎的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2004 Jan;26(1):48-62. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90005-7.
3
Clinical and bacteriological efficacy and safety of 5 and 7 day regimens of telithromycin once daily compared with a 10 day regimen of clarithromycin twice daily in patients with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia.在患有轻至中度社区获得性肺炎的患者中,与每日两次服用10天克拉霉素的方案相比,每日一次服用5天和7天泰利霉素方案的临床、细菌学疗效及安全性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Aug;54(2):515-23. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh356. Epub 2004 Jul 21.
4
Comparison of hospitalization rates in patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with telithromycin for 5 or 7 days or clarithromycin for 10 days.用泰利霉素治疗5天或7天或用克拉霉素治疗10天的社区获得性肺炎患者的住院率比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 May;20(5):739-47. doi: 10.1185/030079904125003610.
5
A prospective, double-blind, multicenter study comparing clarithromycin extended-release with trovafloxacin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.一项前瞻性、双盲、多中心研究,比较克拉霉素缓释剂与曲伐沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎患者的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2002 Apr;24(4):605-15. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85136-0.
6
Comparison of hospitalization rates in patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with 10 days of telithromycin or clarithromycin.接受10天泰利霉素或克拉霉素治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者的住院率比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 May;20(5):749-56. doi: 10.1185/030079904125003601.
7
Use of cethromycin, a new ketolide, for treatment of community-acquired respiratory infections.新型酮内酯类药物西红霉素用于治疗社区获得性呼吸道感染。
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2008 Mar;17(3):387-400. doi: 10.1517/13543784.17.3.387.
8
Cethromycin: a new ketolide antibiotic.西他霉素:一种新型酮内酯类抗生素。
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Mar;47(3):368-79. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R435. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
9
Hospitalization rates among patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with telithromycin vs clarithromycin: results from two randomized, double-blind, clinical trials.使用泰利霉素与克拉霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎患者的住院率:两项随机、双盲临床试验的结果
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Jul;20(7):969-80. doi: 10.1185/030079904125003944.
10
A controlled, double-blind, multicenter study comparing clarithromycin extended-release tablets and levofloxacin tablets in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.一项比较克拉霉素缓释片和左氧氟沙星片治疗社区获得性肺炎的对照、双盲、多中心研究。
Clin Ther. 2002 May;24(5):736-51. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85148-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Cethromycin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for single dose cure of liver stages.塞托霉素单剂量治愈肝期的药代动力学和药效学。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Jun 17:e0021525. doi: 10.1128/aac.00215-25.
2
Cethromycin Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for Single Dose Cure of Liver Stages.塞托霉素单剂量治愈肝脏期的药代动力学和药效学
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 15:2025.02.10.637401. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.10.637401.
3
Identifying the Best Initial Oral Antibiotics for Adults with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Network Meta-Analysis.社区获得性肺炎成人患者最佳初始口服抗生素的选择:一项网络荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 May;39(7):1214-1226. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08674-1. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
4
Appropriateness of antimicrobial selection for treatment of pneumonia in selected public hospitals of Eastern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚东部部分公立医院治疗肺炎的抗菌药物选择合理性:一项横断面研究。
SAGE Open Med. 2023 Apr 13;11:20503121231163792. doi: 10.1177/20503121231163792. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparing Several Treatments with Antibiotics for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.比较几种治疗方法与抗生素治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2021 Jun;50(6):1108-1119. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i6.6410.
6
SIME: synthetic insight-based macrolide enumerator to generate the V1B library of 1 billion macrolides.SIME:基于合成洞察的大环内酯枚举器,用于生成包含10亿种大环内酯的V1B文库。
J Cheminform. 2020 Apr 10;12(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13321-020-00427-6.
7
Emerging Treatment Options for Infections by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Positive Microorganisms.耐多药革兰氏阳性微生物感染的新兴治疗选择
Microorganisms. 2020 Jan 30;8(2):191. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020191.
8
Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America.成人社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗。美国胸科学会和美国传染病学会的官方临床实践指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):e45-e67. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST.
9
Cheminformatics-based enumeration and analysis of large libraries of macrolide scaffolds.基于化学信息学的大环内酯类骨架大型文库的枚举与分析
J Cheminform. 2018 Nov 12;10(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13321-018-0307-6.
10
Antimicrobial Therapy in Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Children.儿童社区获得性肺炎的抗菌治疗
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2018 Sep 20;20(11):47. doi: 10.1007/s11908-018-0653-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Deaths: final data for 2007.死亡情况:2007年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010 May;58(19):1-19.
2
Molecular characterization of off-target activities of telithromycin: a potential role for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.替利霉素致药物脱靶活性的分子特征:烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体的潜在作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Dec;54(12):5399-402. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00840-10. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
3
Optimisation of storage conditions for maintaining culturability of penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in transport medium.优化运输培养基中肺炎链球菌青霉素敏感株和耐青霉素株的保存条件以维持其可培养性
Br J Biomed Sci. 2010;67(1):1-4. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2010.11730281.
4
Safety and tolerability of commonly prescribed oral antibiotics for the treatment of respiratory tract infections.常用口服抗生素治疗呼吸道感染的安全性和耐受性。
Am J Med. 2010 Apr;123(4 Suppl):S26-38. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.02.004.
5
The science of selecting antimicrobials for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).社区获得性肺炎(CAP)抗菌药物的选择科学
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Mar;15(2 Suppl):S5-11. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.s2.5.
6
Clinical features predicting failure of pathogen identification in patients with community acquired pneumonia.预测社区获得性肺炎患者病原体鉴定失败的临床特征。
Scand J Infect Dis. 2008;40(9):715-20. doi: 10.1080/00365540802014864.
7
Overview of recent studies of community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎近期研究综述
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Dec 1;47 Suppl 3:S150-6. doi: 10.1086/591397.
8
Placebo-controlled trials of treatments for community-acquired pneumonia: review of the literature and discussion of feasibility and potential value.社区获得性肺炎治疗的安慰剂对照试验:文献综述及可行性与潜在价值探讨
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Dec 1;47 Suppl 3:S145-9. doi: 10.1086/591396.
9
Issues in noninferiority trials: the evidence in community-acquired pneumonia.非劣效性试验中的问题:社区获得性肺炎的证据
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Dec 1;47 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S108-20. doi: 10.1086/591390.
10
Executive summary: workshop on issues in the design and conduct of clinical trials of antibacterial drugs in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.执行摘要:关于治疗社区获得性肺炎的抗菌药物临床试验设计与实施问题研讨会
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Dec 1;47 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S105-7. doi: 10.1086/591389.

西他霉素与克拉霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎的比较:来自两项双盲、随机、平行分组、多中心、跨国非劣效性研究的疗效和安全性结果。

Cethromycin versus clarithromycin for community-acquired pneumonia: comparative efficacy and safety outcomes from two double-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter, multinational noninferiority studies.

机构信息

Advanced Life Sciences, Inc., Woodridge, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Apr;56(4):2037-47. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05596-11. Epub 2012 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.05596-11
PMID:22290969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3318370/
Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) continues to be a major health challenge in the United States and globally. Factors such as overprescribing of antibiotics and noncompliance with dosing regimens have added to the growing antibacterial resistance problem. In addition, several agents available for the treatment of CAP have been associated with serious side effects. Cethromycin is a new ketolide antibiotic that may provide prescribing physicians with an additional agent to supplement a continually limited armamentarium. Two global phase III noninferiority studies (CL05-001 and CL06-001) to evaluate cethromycin safety and efficacy were designed and conducted in patients with mild to moderate CAP. Study CL05-001 demonstrated an 83.1% clinical cure rate in the cethromycin group compared with 81.1% in the clarithromycin group (95% confidence interval [CI], -4.8%, +8.9%) in the intent to treat (ITT) population and a 94.0% cethromycin clinical cure rate compared with a 93.8% clarithromycin cure rate (95% CI, -4.5%, +5.1%) in the per protocol clinical (PPc) population. Study CL06-001 achieved an 82.9% cethromycin clinical cure rate in the ITT population compared with an 88.5% clarithromycin cure rate (95% CI, -11.9%, +0.6%), whereas the clinical cure rate in the PPc population was 91.5% in cethromycin group compared with 95.9% in clarithromycin group (95% CI, -9.1%, +0.3%). Both studies met the primary endpoints for clinical cure rate based on predefined, sliding-scale noninferiority design. Therefore, in comparison with clarithromycin, these two noninferiority studies demonstrated the efficacy and safety of cethromycin, with encouraging findings of efficacy in subjects with Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteremia. No clinically significant adverse events were observed during the studies. Cethromycin may be a potential oral therapy for the outpatient treatment of CAP.

摘要

社区获得性肺炎(CAP)仍然是美国和全球的主要健康挑战。抗生素过度处方和不遵守剂量方案等因素加剧了日益严重的抗菌药物耐药问题。此外,几种可用于治疗 CAP 的药物已被发现与严重的副作用有关。塞妥霉素是一种新的酮内酯类抗生素,可能为处方医生提供一种额外的治疗药物,以补充不断减少的治疗手段。两项全球 III 期非劣效性研究(CL05-001 和 CL06-001)旨在评估塞妥霉素的安全性和疗效,研究对象为患有轻度至中度 CAP 的患者。CL05-001 研究结果显示,意向治疗(ITT)人群中,塞妥霉素组的临床治愈率为 83.1%,而克拉霉素组为 81.1%(95%置信区间[CI]:-4.8%,+8.9%);在符合方案(PPc)人群中,塞妥霉素组的临床治愈率为 94.0%,而克拉霉素组为 93.8%(95%CI:-4.5%,+5.1%)。CL06-001 研究结果显示,ITT 人群中,塞妥霉素组的临床治愈率为 82.9%,而克拉霉素组为 88.5%(95%CI:-11.9%,+0.6%);PPc 人群中,塞妥霉素组的临床治愈率为 91.5%,而克拉霉素组为 95.9%(95%CI:-9.1%,+0.3%)。这两项研究均达到了基于预设滑动比例非劣效性设计的主要临床治愈率终点。因此,与克拉霉素相比,这两项非劣效性研究表明塞妥霉素具有疗效和安全性,并且在肺炎链球菌菌血症患者中具有令人鼓舞的疗效。研究期间未观察到临床意义上的不良事件。塞妥霉素可能成为门诊治疗 CAP 的一种有潜力的口服治疗药物。