Suppr超能文献

正常和病理性衰老中的认知可塑性。

Cognitive plasticity in normal and pathological aging.

机构信息

Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Interv Aging. 2012;7:15-25. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S27008. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

Abstract

The main goal of the present study is to examine to what extent age and cognitive impairment contribute to learning performance (cognitive plasticity, cognitive modifiability, or learning potential). To address this question, participants coming from four studies (Longitudinal Study of Active Aging, age range, 55-75 years, N = 458; Longitudinal Study in the very old [90+], age range, 90-102, N = 188, and Cognitive Plasticity within the Course of Cognitive Impairment, 97 "Normal", 57 mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and 98 Alzheimer's disease [AD] patients) were examined through a measure of verbal learning (developed from Rey). The results show that all age, MCI, and AD groups learned across the five learning trials of that test, but significant differences were found due to age, pathology, and education. The effects of pathology (MCI and AD) can be expressed in a metric of "years of normal decline by age"; specifically, being MCI means suffering an impairment in performance that is equivalent to the decline of a normal individual during 15 years, whereas the impact of AD is equivalent to 22.7 years. Likewise, the improvement associated with about 5 years of education is equivalent to about 1 year less of normal aging. Also, the two pathological groups significantly differed from "normal" groups in the delayed trial of the test. The most dramatic difference is that between the "normal" group and the AD patients, which shows relatively poorer performance for the AD group in the delayed trial than in the first learning trial. The potential role of this unique effect for quick detection purposes of AD is assessed (in the 75-89 years age range, sensitivity and specificity equal 0.813 and 0.917, respectively).

摘要

本研究的主要目的是考察年龄和认知障碍在多大程度上影响学习表现(认知可塑性、认知可变性或学习潜力)。为了回答这个问题,我们对来自四项研究的参与者进行了检查(积极老龄化纵向研究,年龄范围为 55-75 岁,N=458;非常高龄纵向研究[90+],年龄范围为 90-102,N=188,以及认知障碍过程中的认知可塑性,97 名“正常”、57 名轻度认知障碍[MCI]和 98 名阿尔茨海默病[AD]患者),通过一项言语学习测试(基于 Rey 测试开发)进行了评估。结果表明,所有年龄、MCI 和 AD 组在该测试的五次学习试验中都有所学习,但由于年龄、病理和教育的不同,存在显著差异。病理(MCI 和 AD)的影响可以用“按年龄正常下降的年数”的度量来表示;具体来说,MCI 意味着在表现上存在障碍,相当于正常个体在 15 年内的衰退,而 AD 的影响则相当于 22.7 年。同样,与大约 5 年教育相关的改善相当于大约 1 年的正常衰老。此外,两个病理组在测试的延迟试验中与“正常”组显著不同。最显著的差异是“正常”组和 AD 患者之间的差异,AD 患者在延迟试验中的表现明显不如第一次学习试验。评估了这种独特效应在快速检测 AD 方面的潜在作用(在 75-89 岁年龄范围内,敏感性和特异性分别为 0.813 和 0.917)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验