Massoud Arab Amir, Reza Nourbakhsh Mohammad, Mohammadifar Ali
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Feb;19(1):5-10. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12804993426848.
It has been suggested that tight hamstring muscle, due to its anatomical connections, could be a compensatory mechanism for providing sacroiliac (SI) joint stability in patients with gluteal muscle weakness and SIJ dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between hamstring muscle length and gluteal muscle strength in subjects with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. A total of 159 subjects with and without low back pain (LBP) between the ages of 20 and 65 years participate in the study. Subjects were categorized into three groups: LBP without SIJ involvement (n = 53); back pain with SIJ dysfunction (n = 53); and no low back pain (n = 53). Hamstring muscle length and gluteal muscle strength were measured in all subjects. The number of individuals with gluteal weakness was significantly (P = 0.02) higher in subjects with SI joint dysfunction (66%) compared to those with LBP without SI joint dysfunctions (34%). In pooled data, there was no significant difference (P = 0.31) in hamstring muscle length between subjects with SI joint dysfunction and those with back pain without SI involvement. In subjects with SI joint dysfunction, however, those with gluteal muscle weakness had significantly (P = 0.02) shorter hamstring muscle length (mean = 158±11°) compared to individuals without gluteal weakness (mean = 165±10°). There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) in hamstring muscle length between individuals with and without gluteal muscle weakness in other groups. In conclusion, hamstring tightness in subjects with SI joint dysfunction could be related to gluteal muscle weakness. The slight difference in hamstring muscle length found in this study, although statistically significant, was not sufficient for making any definite conclusions. Further studies are needed to establish the role of hamstring muscle in SI joint stability.
有人提出,由于其解剖学联系,腘绳肌紧张可能是臀肌无力和骶髂关节功能障碍患者提供骶髂关节稳定性的一种代偿机制。本研究的目的是确定骶髂关节功能障碍受试者腘绳肌长度与臀肌力量之间的关系。共有159名年龄在20至65岁之间有或无腰痛的受试者参与了这项研究。受试者被分为三组:无骶髂关节受累的腰痛患者(n = 53);伴有骶髂关节功能障碍的背痛患者(n = 53);以及无腰痛患者(n = 53)。对所有受试者测量了腘绳肌长度和臀肌力量。与无骶髂关节功能障碍的腰痛患者(34%)相比,骶髂关节功能障碍患者中臀肌无力的个体数量显著更高(P = 0.02)(66%)。在汇总数据中,骶髂关节功能障碍患者与无骶髂关节受累的背痛患者之间的腘绳肌长度没有显著差异(P = 0.31)。然而,在骶髂关节功能障碍患者中,与无臀肌无力的个体(平均值 = 165±10°)相比,有臀肌无力的个体腘绳肌长度显著更短(P = 0.02)(平均值 = 158±11°)。在其他组中,有和无臀肌无力的个体之间的腘绳肌长度没有统计学上的显著差异(P>0.05)。总之,骶髂关节功能障碍受试者的腘绳肌紧张可能与臀肌无力有关。本研究中发现的腘绳肌长度的细微差异,尽管具有统计学意义,但不足以得出任何明确结论。需要进一步研究以确定腘绳肌在骶髂关节稳定性中的作用。