• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[秋季鼎湖山大气细颗粒物及二次无机化合物的污染特征与来源]

[Pollution characteristics and source of the atmospheric fine particles and secondary inorganic compounds at Mount Dinghu in autumn season].

作者信息

Liu Zi-Rui, Wang Yue-Si, Liu Quan, Liu Lu-Ning, Zhang De-Qiang

机构信息

LAPC, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2011 Nov;32(11):3160-6.

PMID:22295607
Abstract

Real-time measurements of PM2.5, secondary inorganic compounds in PM2.5 (SO4(2-), NH4(+), and NO3(-)) and related gaseous pollutants were conducted at Mount Dinghu, a regional background station of the Pearl River Delta (PRD), in October and November 2008 by using a conventional R&P TEOM and a system of rapid collection of fine particles and ion chromatography (RCFP-IC). Sources and transportation of atmospheric particles during the experiment were discussed with principal component analysis and backward trajectories calculated using HYSPLIT model. The average daily mass concentrations of PM2.5 were 76.9 microg x m(-3) during sampling period, and average daily mass concentrations of SO4(2-), NH4(+), and NO3(-) were 20.0 microg x m(-3), 6.8 microg x m(-3) and 2.6 microg x m(-3), respectively. The sum of these three secondary inorganic compounds accounted for more than one third of the PM2.5 mass concentration, which had become the major source of atmospheric fine particles at Mount Dinghu. The diurnal variation of PM2.5, SO4(2-), and NH4(+) all showed a "bimodal" distribution with two peaks appeared at 10:00 am and at 16:00 pm, respectively, whereas NO3(-s) howed "single peak" distribution peaked at 10:00 am. The mass concentrations of SO4(2-) in PM2.5 had the similar diurnal variation with that of SO2, SO4(2-) in PM2.5 was mainly transformed from SO2, whereas NO3(-) showed difference diurnal variation with that of NO2, and the second conversion rate of NO2 was far lower than that of SO2. NH4(+) in PM2.5 existed mainly in the form of sulfate, nitrate and chloride. Both of principal component analysis and back trajectory analysis showed that the variations of PM2.5 and secondary inorganic compounds at Mount Dinghu were mainly affected by the long-range transport air mass passed over Guangzhou, Huizhou and other highly industrialized areas which carried air pollutants to the observation site, at the same time local sulfate originated from secondary formation also contributed an important part of atmospheric fine particles and the contribution from local direct emission was little.

摘要

2008年10月和11月,在珠江三角洲地区背景站鼎湖山,使用传统的R&P TEOM以及细颗粒快速采集与离子色谱系统(RCFP-IC)对PM2.5、PM2.5中的二次无机化合物(SO4(2-)、NH4(+)和NO3(-))及相关气态污染物进行了实时测量。利用主成分分析和使用HYSPLIT模型计算的后向轨迹,讨论了实验期间大气颗粒物的来源和传输。采样期间PM2.5的日均质量浓度为76.9μg x m(-3),SO4(2-)、NH4(+)和NO3(-)的日均质量浓度分别为20.0μg x m(-3)、6.8μg x m(-3)和2.6μg x m(-3)。这三种二次无机化合物的总和占PM2.5质量浓度的三分之一以上,已成为鼎湖山大气细颗粒物的主要来源。PM2.5、SO4(2-)和NH4(+)的日变化均呈“双峰”分布,两个峰值分别出现在上午10:00和下午16:00,而NO3(-)呈“单峰”分布,峰值出现在上午10:00。PM2.5中SO4(2-)的质量浓度与SO2具有相似的日变化,PM2.5中的SO4(2-)主要由SO2转化而来,而NO3(-)与NO2的日变化不同,NO2的二次转化率远低于SO2。PM2.5中的NH4(+)主要以硫酸盐、硝酸盐和氯化物的形式存在。主成分分析和后向轨迹分析均表明,鼎湖山PM2.5和二次无机化合物的变化主要受经过广州、惠州等高度工业化地区的长距离传输气团影响,这些气团将空气污染物输送到观测站点,同时本地二次生成的硫酸盐也是大气细颗粒物的重要组成部分,本地直接排放的贡献较小。

相似文献

1
[Pollution characteristics and source of the atmospheric fine particles and secondary inorganic compounds at Mount Dinghu in autumn season].[秋季鼎湖山大气细颗粒物及二次无机化合物的污染特征与来源]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2011 Nov;32(11):3160-6.
2
[Characteristics of mass size distributions of water-soluble, inorganic ions during summer and winter haze days of Beijing].[北京夏季和冬季霾天期间水溶性无机离子的质量粒径分布特征]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2013 Apr;34(4):1236-44.
3
[Characterization of water-soluble inorganic ions in PM2.5 and PM1.0 in summer in Guangzhou].[广州夏季PM2.5和PM1.0中水溶性无机离子的表征]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2010 Jul;31(7):1417-24.
4
In situ continuous hourly observations of wintertime nitrate, sulfate and ammonium in a megacity in the North China plain from 2014 to 2019: Temporal variation, chemical formation and regional transport.2014 年至 2019 年中国华北平原特大城市冬季硝酸盐、硫酸盐和铵盐的原位连续逐时观测:时间变化、化学形成和区域传输。
Chemosphere. 2021 Jan;262:127745. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127745. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
5
[Formation and Size Distribution of the Secondary Aerosol Inorganic Ions in Different Intensity of Haze in Qingdao, China].[中国青岛不同雾霾强度下二次气溶胶无机离子的形成与粒径分布]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2017 Jul 8;38(7):2667-2678. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201612042.
6
[Characterization of water-soluble ions in PM2.5 at Dinghu Mount].[鼎湖山PM2.5中水溶性离子的表征]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2013 Apr;34(4):1232-5.
7
[Chemical characteristics of water-soluble components of aerosol particles at different altitudes of the Mount Huang in the summer].[夏季黄山不同海拔高度气溶胶粒子水溶性组分的化学特征]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2013 May;34(5):1973-81.
8
[Transformation Mechanism and Sources of Secondary Inorganic Components in PM2.5 at an Agriculture Site (Quzhou) in the North China Plain in Summer].[华北平原夏季农业站点(衢州)PM2.5中次生无机成分的转化机制及来源]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2015 Oct;36(10):3554-65.
9
[Pollution characteristics of secondary water-soluble inorganic ions of PM2.5 in urban Chengdu, China].中国成都市区PM2.5中二次水溶性无机离子的污染特征
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2014 Dec;35(12):4439-45.
10
[Seasonal Variation and Source Analysis of Water-soluble Inorganic Salts in PM in the Southern Suburbs of Beijing].[北京南郊PM中水溶性无机盐的季节变化及来源分析]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2018 May 8;39(5):1987-1993. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201709003.

引用本文的文献

1
Chemical Characteristics of Atmospheric PM and PM at a Rural Site of Lijiang City, China.中国丽江市农村地区大气 PM 和 PM 的化学特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 20;17(24):9553. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249553.
2
PM Cooperative Control with Fuzzy Cost and Fuzzy Coalitions.PM 模糊代价和模糊联盟的协同控制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 9;16(7):1271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071271.