School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2013 Mar;26(2):217-39. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2011.651616. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
This study investigated the effects of workload, control, and general self-efficacy on affective task reactions (i.e., demands-ability fit, active coping, and anxiety) during a work simulation. The main goals were (1) to determine the extent general self-efficacy moderates the effects of demand and control on affective task reactions and (2) to determine if this varies as a function of changes in workload. Participants (N=141) completed an inbox activity under conditions of low or high control and within low and high workload conditions. The order of trials varied so that workload increased or decreased. Results revealed individuals with high general self-efficacy reported better demands-abilities fit and active coping as well as less anxiety. Three interactive effects were found. First, it was found that high control increased demands-abilities fit from trial 1 to trial 2, but only when workload decreased. Second, it was found that low efficacious individuals active coping increased in trial 2, but only under high control. Third, it was found that high control helped high efficacious individuals manage anxiety when workload decreased. However, for individuals with low general self-efficacy, neither high nor low control alleviated anxiety (i.e., whether workload increased or decreased over time).
本研究调查了工作负荷、控制和一般自我效能感对工作模拟中情感任务反应(即需求-能力匹配、积极应对和焦虑)的影响。主要目的是:(1) 确定一般自我效能感在多大程度上调节需求和控制对情感任务反应的影响;(2) 确定这种影响是否随工作负荷的变化而变化。参与者(N=141)在低控制和高控制以及低工作负荷和高工作负荷条件下完成了收件箱活动。试验的顺序是变化的,这样工作负荷就会增加或减少。结果表明,自我效能感高的个体报告说需求-能力匹配更好,积极应对更多,焦虑更少。发现了三个交互作用。首先,发现高控制在工作负荷降低时增加了从试验 1 到试验 2 的需求-能力匹配。其次,发现低效能个体在高控制下,在试验 2 中积极应对的能力有所提高。第三,发现高控制有助于高自我效能感的个体在工作负荷降低时管理焦虑。然而,对于自我效能感低的个体,高控制和低控制都不能缓解焦虑(即,随着时间的推移,工作负荷是增加还是减少)。