Vaernes R J, Bergan T, Warncke M, Ursin H, Aakvaag A, Hockey R
Norwegian Underwater Technology Center, Bergen.
Adv Space Biol Med. 1993;3:95-120.
Six healthy males, the EMSInauts, were isolated in hyperbaric chambers for a period of 28 days at 5-msw overpressure. During that period they had to carry out meaningful operational and research tasks in addition to monitoring their psychological and physiological reactions. The actual workload was evaluated and compared with the planned workload, and its effects on symptomatology and psychobiology. The perceived workload and its effects on psychosomatic symptomatology and on some biological indices were monitored. Thus it was possible to evaluate how the workload carried during 4 weeks of isolation affected the psychological and biological well-being of the six EMSInauts. The following three types of assessments were performed: 1. Workload assessment: The objective workload was calculated based on the schedule which was revised daily, and the actual load calculated by the commander. A workload questionnaire was administered daily after each working session. 2. Psychosomatic assessment: Morning and evening questionnaires were administered daily. The state of health and of anxiety were also evaluated. 3. Biological indices: Cortisol, testosterone, adrenalin, and noradrenaline were determined once a week. In addition, cardiac activity was monitored every day. The workload assessment showed that on the average the planned workload was accomplished in slightly less than the scheduled time. The workload was not perceived as severe in terms of cognitive, emotional, and physical load. The group rated the support received from each other and from the mission control personnel as average, with minor changes during the isolation period. They gave a high rating to the amount of control they had over their activities. Fatigue and tension were scored in the middle range. The psychosomatic assessment showed that there were few symptoms, and these were mostly of low severity. The most common symptom was general fatigue. Furthermore, minor dizziness, headache and light tremor was in some cases reported. The sleep quality was good, but complaints about poor sleep increased somewhat with the passing of time. Few and mostly minor health problems were experienced during isolation. Only one EMSInaut had to miss one day of work due to a bout of flu. The state of anxiety was below that of the general population throughout the isolation period. The biological indices used showed no evidence of stress from the workload handled during the isolation period. The level of the "stress hormone" cortisol actually decreased during isolation. The adrenalin excretion, which tends to go up during acute stress, remained unchanged during this period. Neither was there any evidence of changes in cardiac activity throughout the isolation period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
六名健康男性,即高压舱乘员,在5米海水深度超压的高压舱内隔离了28天。在此期间,他们除了监测自己的心理和生理反应外,还必须执行有意义的操作和研究任务。对实际工作量进行了评估,并与计划工作量进行比较,以及评估其对症状学和心理生物学的影响。监测了感知到的工作量及其对心身症状学和一些生物学指标的影响。这样就有可能评估在4周隔离期间所承担的工作量如何影响这六名高压舱乘员的心理和生理健康。进行了以下三种类型的评估:1. 工作量评估:根据每日修订的时间表计算客观工作量,并由指挥官计算实际工作量。每次工作 session 后每天发放一份工作量问卷。2. 心身评估:每天早晚发放问卷。还评估了健康状况和焦虑状态。3. 生物学指标:每周测定一次皮质醇、睾酮、肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素。此外,每天监测心脏活动。工作量评估表明,平均而言,计划工作量在略少于预定时间内完成。就认知、情绪和身体负荷而言,工作量并未被视为严重。该小组将彼此之间以及从任务控制人员那里获得的支持评为中等,在隔离期间有轻微变化。他们对自己活动的控制程度给予了高度评价。疲劳和紧张程度得分中等。心身评估表明,症状很少,而且大多严重程度较低。最常见的症状是全身疲劳。此外,在某些情况下还报告了轻微头晕、头痛和轻度震颤。睡眠质量良好,但随着时间的推移,关于睡眠不佳的抱怨有所增加。隔离期间很少出现健康问题,而且大多不太严重。只有一名高压舱乘员因患流感不得不缺勤一天。在整个隔离期间,焦虑状态低于一般人群。所使用的生物学指标没有显示出隔离期间所处理的工作量带来压力的迹象。“应激激素”皮质醇的水平在隔离期间实际上有所下降。在急性应激期间往往会上升的肾上腺素排泄在此期间保持不变。在整个隔离期间也没有任何心脏活动变化的迹象。(摘要截选至400字)