• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同频率响应和声音水平的重放声音的感知质量。

Perceived sound quality of reproductions with different frequency responses and sound levels.

作者信息

Gabrielsson A, Hagerman B, Bech-Kristensen T, Lundberg G

机构信息

Department of Technical Audiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Sep;88(3):1359-66. doi: 10.1121/1.399713.

DOI:10.1121/1.399713
PMID:2229671
Abstract

Three programs (female voice, jazz music, and pink noise) were reproduced using four different frequency responses and two different sound levels. Fourteen normal hearing subjects listened to the reproduction via earphones and judged the sound quality on seven perceptual scales (loudness, clarity, fullness, spaciousness, brightness, softness/gentleness, and nearness) and a fidelity scale. Significant differences among the reproductions appeared in all scales and could be attributed to the differences in frequency response or sound level or both. Interactions between the reproductions and the programs could be explained by the relations between the spectrum of the programs and the frequency responses used. The results for the noise program were similar to those for the jazz music program.

摘要

使用四种不同的频率响应和两种不同的声级再现了三个节目(女性声音、爵士音乐和粉红噪声)。14名听力正常的受试者通过耳机收听了这些再现内容,并在七个感知尺度(响度、清晰度、饱满度、空间感、明亮度、柔和度/温柔度和亲近感)以及一个保真度尺度上对音质进行了评判。在所有尺度上,再现内容之间都出现了显著差异,这些差异可归因于频率响应或声级或两者的差异。再现内容与节目之间的相互作用可以通过节目频谱与所使用的频率响应之间的关系来解释。噪声节目的结果与爵士音乐节目的结果相似。

相似文献

1
Perceived sound quality of reproductions with different frequency responses and sound levels.不同频率响应和声音水平的重放声音的感知质量。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Sep;88(3):1359-66. doi: 10.1121/1.399713.
2
Perceived sound quality in a hearing aid with vented and closed earmould equalized in frequency response.
Scand Audiol. 1992;21(2):87-92. doi: 10.3109/01050399209045987.
3
The effects of different frequency responses on sound quality judgments and speech intelligibility.不同频率响应对音质判断和语音清晰度的影响。
J Speech Hear Res. 1988 Jun;31(2):166-77. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3102.166.
4
Effects of HearFones on speaking and singing voice quality.HearFones对说话和唱歌嗓音质量的影响。
J Voice. 2004 Dec;18(4):475-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2003.05.007.
5
Perceptual aspects of singing.
J Voice. 1994 Jun;8(2):106-22. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80303-0.
6
Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.老年助听器佩戴者声音质量判断的可靠性和有效性。
Ear Hear. 2003 Feb;24(1):4-11. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000051745.69182.14.
7
Noise tolerance in human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.人类对语音音高的频率跟随反应的噪声容限。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jan;129(1):EL21-6. doi: 10.1121/1.3528775.
8
Control of voice fundamental frequency in speaking versus singing.说话与唱歌时嗓音基频的控制。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Mar;113(3):1587-93. doi: 10.1121/1.1543928.
9
Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.从烦恼度、响度和可听度评级方面评估标准的空气声隔绝措施。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jul;126(1):208-19. doi: 10.1121/1.3147499.
10
Expectations for melodic contours transcend pitch.对旋律轮廓的期望超越了音高。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Dec;40(6):2338-47. doi: 10.1037/a0038291. Epub 2014 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Speaking out for speakers: a guide for and analysis of robot speaker design.为演讲者发声:机器人扬声器设计指南与分析
Front Robot AI. 2024 Nov 29;11:1394700. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1394700. eCollection 2024.
2
Tonotopic and Default Frequency Fitting for Music Perception in Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.用于人工耳蜗植入者音乐感知的音调与默认频率拟合:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Nov 1;150(11):960-968. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2895.
3
The effect of stimulus duration on preferences for gain adjustments when listening to speech.
刺激持续时间对聆听语音时增益调整偏好的影响。
Int J Audiol. 2022 Nov;61(11):940-947. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1998676. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
4
The Type of Noise Influences Quality Ratings for Noisy Speech in Hearing Aid Users.噪声类型会影响助听器使用者对噪声环境下言语的质量评级。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Dec 14;63(12):4300-4313. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00156. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
5
The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical hearing impairment on music quality perception.对称和非对称听力损伤对音乐质量感知的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Sep;273(9):2451-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3838-8. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
6
Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users.人工耳蜗使用者音乐感知、评价及体验的临床评估
Int J Audiol. 2015 Feb;54(2):114-23. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.948219. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
7
Effects of bandwidth, compression speed, and gain at high frequencies on preferences for amplified music.高频下带宽、压缩速度和增益对放大音乐偏好的影响。
Trends Amplif. 2012 Sep;16(3):159-72. doi: 10.1177/1084713812465494. Epub 2012 Nov 19.