Suppr超能文献

噪声类型会影响助听器使用者对噪声环境下言语的质量评级。

The Type of Noise Influences Quality Ratings for Noisy Speech in Hearing Aid Users.

作者信息

Lundberg Emily M H, Chon Song Hui, Kates James M, Anderson Melinda C, Arehart Kathryn H

机构信息

Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Science, University of Colorado Boulder.

Department of Audio Engineering Technology, Belmont University, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Dec 14;63(12):4300-4313. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00156. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

Abstract

Purpose The overall goal of the current study was to determine whether noise type plays a role in perceptual quality ratings. We compared quality ratings using various noise types and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) ranges using hearing aid simulations to consider the effects of hearing aid processing features. Method Ten older adults with bilateral mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss rated the sound quality of sentences processed through a hearing aid simulation and presented in the presence of five different noise types (six-talker babble, three-talker conversation, street traffic, kitchen, and fast-food restaurant) at four SNRs (3, 8, 12, and 20 dB). Results Everyday noise types differentially affected sound quality ratings even when presented at the same SNR: Kitchen and three-talker noises were rated significantly higher than restaurant, traffic, and multitalker babble, which were not different from each other. The effects of noise type were most pronounced at poorer SNRs. Conclusions The findings of this study showed that noise types differentially affected sound quality ratings. The differences we observed were consistent with the acoustic characteristics of the noise types. Noise types having lower envelope fluctuations yielded lower quality ratings than noise types characterized by sporadic high-intensity events at the same SNR.

摘要

目的 本研究的总体目标是确定噪声类型是否在感知质量评级中起作用。我们使用助听器模拟比较了使用各种噪声类型和信噪比(SNR)范围的质量评级,以考虑助听器处理功能的影响。方法 十名患有双侧轻度至中度重度感音神经性听力损失的老年人对通过助听器模拟处理并在四种信噪比(3、8、12和20 dB)下呈现的五种不同噪声类型(六人交谈声、三人交谈声、街道交通声、厨房声和快餐店声)存在时的句子音质进行评级。结果 即使在相同的信噪比下呈现,日常噪声类型对音质评级的影响也不同:厨房声和三人交谈声的评级明显高于餐厅声、交通声和多人交谈声,而后三者之间没有差异。噪声类型的影响在较差的信噪比下最为明显。结论 本研究结果表明,噪声类型对音质评级有不同影响。我们观察到的差异与噪声类型的声学特征一致。在相同的信噪比下,具有较低包络波动的噪声类型产生的质量评级低于以零星高强度事件为特征的噪声类型。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

10
Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance.使用客观指标衡量助听器性能。
Ear Hear. 2018 Nov/Dec;39(6):1165-1175. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000574.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验