• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估患者自付抗高血压药物费用对依从性、药物及医疗保健利用和支出的影响。

An evaluation of the impact of patient cost sharing for antihypertensive medications on adherence, medication and health care utilization, and expenditures.

作者信息

Pesa Jacqueline A, Van Den Bos Jill, Gray Travis, Hartsig Colleen, McQueen Robert Brett, Saseen Joseph J, Nair Kavita V

机构信息

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Louisville, CO, USA.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:63-72. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S28396. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S28396
PMID:22298945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3269319/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of patient cost-sharing for antihypertensive medications on the proportion of days covered (PDC) by antihypertensive medications, medical utilization, and health care expenditures among commercially insured individuals assigned to different risk categories.

METHODS

Participants were identified from the Consolidated Health Cost Guidelines (CHCG) database (January 1, 2006-December 31, 2008) based on a diagnosis (index) claim for hypertension, continuous enrollment ≥12 months pre- and post-index, and no prior claims for antihypertensive medications. Participants were assigned to: low-risk group (no comorbidities), high-risk group (1+ selected comorbidities), or very high-risk group (prior hospitalization for 1+ selected comorbidities). The relationship between patient cost sharing and PDC by antihypertensive medications was assessed using standard linear regression models, controlling for risk group membership, and various demographic and clinical factors. The relationship between PDC and health care service utilization was subsequently examined using negative binomial regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 28,688 study patients, 66% were low risk. The multivariate regression model supported a relationship between patient cost sharing per 30-day fill and PDC in the following year. For every US$1.00 increase in cost sharing, PDC decreased by 1.1 days (P < 0.0001). Significant predictors of PDC included high risk, older age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, geography, and total post-index insurer- and patient-paid costs. An increase in PDC was associated with a decrease in all-cause and hypertension-related inpatient, outpatient, and emergency room visits and medical, pharmacy, and total costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The trend has been for managed care organizations and employers to require patients to bear a greater out-of-pocket burden for health care resources consumed. This study illustrates the potential adverse effects of higher patient cost sharing among patients with hypertension stratified by different risk levels. A decrease in PDC was predictive of higher resource utilization and health care costs, which should be of interest to payers and employers alike.

摘要

目的

评估商业保险人群中,不同风险类别患者的降压药物费用分担对降压药物覆盖天数比例(PDC)、医疗服务利用及医疗保健支出的影响。

方法

从综合健康成本指南(CHCG)数据库(2006年1月1日至2008年12月31日)中,根据高血压诊断(索引)索赔、索引前后连续参保≥12个月且无降压药物既往索赔记录来确定参与者。参与者被分为:低风险组(无合并症)、高风险组(一种或多种选定合并症)或极高风险组(因一种或多种选定合并症曾住院治疗)。使用标准线性回归模型评估患者费用分担与降压药物PDC之间的关系,同时控制风险组成员身份以及各种人口统计学和临床因素。随后使用负二项回归模型研究PDC与医疗服务利用之间的关系。

结果

在28,688名研究患者中,66%为低风险。多变量回归模型支持每30天配药的患者费用分担与次年PDC之间的关系。费用分担每增加1.00美元,PDC减少1.1天(P<0.0001)。PDC的显著预测因素包括高风险、年龄较大、性别、查尔森合并症指数评分、地理位置以及索引后保险公司和患者支付的总费用。PDC的增加与全因和高血压相关的住院、门诊和急诊就诊次数以及医疗、药房和总费用的减少相关。

结论

管理式医疗组织和雇主的趋势是要求患者为所消耗的医疗保健资源承担更大的自付负担。本研究说明了不同风险水平分层的高血压患者中,较高的患者费用分担可能产生的不利影响。PDC的降低预示着更高的资源利用和医疗保健成本,这应该引起支付方和雇主的关注。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the impact of patient cost sharing for antihypertensive medications on adherence, medication and health care utilization, and expenditures.评估患者自付抗高血压药物费用对依从性、药物及医疗保健利用和支出的影响。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:63-72. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S28396. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
2
The costs of warfarin underuse and nonadherence in patients with atrial fibrillation: a commercial insurer perspective.心房颤动患者华法林使用不足和不依从的成本:商业保险公司视角
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 May;19(4):302-16. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.4.302.
3
Evaluating the relationship between quality measure adherence definitions and economic outcomes in commercial health plans: a retrospective diabetes cohort study.评估商业健康计划中质量衡量标准遵守情况的定义与经济结果之间的关系:一项回顾性糖尿病队列研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jan;27(1):64-72. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.1.064.
4
Disease-related and all-cause health care costs of elderly patients with gout.老年痛风患者与疾病相关的医疗费用及全因医疗费用。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Mar;14(2):164-75. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.2.164.
5
Effect of antihypertensive medication adherence among employees with hypertension.高血压员工的降压药物治疗依从性的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Dec;15(12):871-80.
6
Impact of a Step Therapy for Guanfacine Extended-Release on Medication Utilization and Health Care Expenditures Among Individuals Receiving Treatment for ADHD.胍法辛缓释剂阶梯治疗对 ADHD 治疗患者药物利用和医疗支出的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Sep;21(9):793-802, 802a-802i. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.9.793.
7
Impact of a Novel Cost-Saving Pharmacy Program on Pregabalin Use and Health Care Costs.新型节省成本的药房方案对普瑞巴林使用和医疗保健费用的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Feb;22(2):132-44. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.15180. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
8
Specialty drug and health care utilization vary by wage level in employer-sponsored health plans.雇主赞助的健康计划中,特种药物和医疗保健的使用因工资水平而异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Aug;28(8):918-928. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.22091. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
9
Economic Burden of Illness Among Patients with Severe Asthma in a Managed Care Setting.在管理式医疗环境下重度哮喘患者的疾病经济负担
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jul;22(7):848-61. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.848.
10
Prevalence of Low-Cost Generic Program Use in a Nationally Representative Cohort of Privately Insured Adults.在全国代表性的私人保险成年人队列中,低成本通用药物方案使用的流行率。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Dec;21(12):1162-70. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.12.1162.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-sharing and adherence, clinical outcomes, health care utilization, and costs: A systematic literature review.费用分担与依从性、临床结局、医疗保健利用和成本:系统文献回顾。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Jan;29(1):4-16. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.21270. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
2
Effectiveness of low-cost reminder package combined with case-based health education to improve hypertensive patients' medication adherence: a clustered randomized controlled trial.低成本提醒包联合病例式健康教育提高高血压患者用药依从性的效果:一项整群随机对照试验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Jul 10;13:1083-1092. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S194667. eCollection 2019.
3
Applying a health system perspective to the evolving Farmácia Popular medicines access programme in Brazil.从卫生系统角度审视巴西不断发展的大众药房药品获取计划。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Feb 7;2(Suppl 3):e000547. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000547. eCollection 2017.
4
Impact of Mental Disorders on the Association Between Adherence to Antihypertensive Agents and All-Cause Healthcare Costs.精神障碍对降压药物依从性与全因医疗费用之间关联的影响。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Jan;19(1):75-81. doi: 10.1111/jch.12869. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
5
The influence of health systems on hypertension awareness, treatment, and control: a systematic literature review.卫生系统对高血压知晓率、治疗率和控制率的影响:系统文献回顾。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(7):e1001490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001490. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

本文引用的文献

1
A value-based insurance design program at a large company boosted medication adherence for employees with chronic illnesses.一家大公司的基于价值的保险设计方案提高了慢性病员工的药物依从性。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jan;30(1):109-17. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0510.
2
Recent trends in the prevalence of high blood pressure and its treatment and control, 1999-2008.1999 - 2008年高血压患病率及其治疗与控制的近期趋势
NCHS Data Brief. 2010 Oct(48):1-8.
3
Copayment reductions generate greater medication adherence in targeted patients.自付额降低可提高目标患者的药物依从性。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Nov;29(11):2002-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0571.
4
Nonadherence to clinical practice guidelines and medications for multiple chronic conditions in a California Medicaid population.加利福尼亚州医疗补助计划人群中多种慢性疾病的临床实践指南和药物治疗的不依从情况。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2010 Jul-Aug;50(4):496-507. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2010.09123.
5
Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association.执行摘要:《2010年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2010 Feb 23;121(7):948-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192666.
6
Increasing copayments and adherence to diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemic medications.增加共付额与糖尿病、高血压和高脂血症药物的依从性。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan 1;16(1):e20-34.
7
Cost-sharing and adherence to antihypertensives for low and high adherers.费用分担与低和高依从性抗高血压药物的使用。
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Nov;15(11):833-40.
8
Impact of a prescription copayment increase on lipid-lowering medication adherence in veterans.处方自付费用增加对退伍军人降脂药物依从性的影响。
Circulation. 2009 Jan 27;119(3):390-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.783944. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
9
Impact of decreasing copayments on medication adherence within a disease management environment.疾病管理环境中降低自付费用对药物依从性的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jan-Feb;27(1):103-12. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.103.
10
Prescription drug cost sharing: associations with medication and medical utilization and spending and health.处方药费用分担:与药物使用、医疗利用、支出及健康的关联
JAMA. 2007 Jul 4;298(1):61-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.1.61.