• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增加共付额与糖尿病、高血压和高脂血症药物的依从性。

Increasing copayments and adherence to diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemic medications.

机构信息

Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care (152), Durham VA Medical Center, 508 Fulton St, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan 1;16(1):e20-34.

PMID:20059288
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of a medication copayment increase on adherence to diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemic medications.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective pre-post observational study.

METHODS

This study compared medication adherence at 4 Veterans Affairs medical centers between veterans who were exempt from copayments and propensity-matched veterans who were not exempt. The diabetes sample included 1069 exempt veterans and 1069 nonexempt veterans, the hypertension sample included 3545 exempt veterans and 3545 nonexempt veterans, and the sample of veterans taking statins included 2029 exempt veterans and 2029 nonexempt veterans. The main outcome measure was medication adherence 12 months before and 23 months after the copayment increase. Adherence differences were assessed in a difference-in-difference approach by using generalized estimating equations that controlled for time, copayment exemption, an interaction between time and copayment exemption, and patient demographics, site, and other factors.

RESULTS

Adherence to all medications increased in the short term for all veterans, but then declined in the longer term (February-December 2003). The change in adherence between the preperiod and the postperiod was significantly different for exempt and nonexempt veterans in all 3 cohorts, and nonadherence increased over time for veterans required to pay copayments. The impact of the copayment increase was particularly adverse for veterans with diabetes who were required to pay copayments.

CONCLUSION

A $5 copayment increase (from $2 to $7) adversely impacted medication adherence for veterans subject to copayments taking oral hypoglycemic agents, antihypertensive medications, or statins.

摘要

目的

考察药物自付额增加对糖尿病、高血压和高血脂药物依从性的影响。

研究设计

回顾性前后观察研究。

方法

本研究比较了在退伍军人事务部的 4 个医疗中心,在有和没有药物自付豁免的退伍军人之间,药物依从性的差异。糖尿病组包括 1069 名豁免自付的退伍军人和 1069 名非豁免自付的退伍军人,高血压组包括 3545 名豁免自付的退伍军人和 3545 名非豁免自付的退伍军人,服用他汀类药物的退伍军人样本包括 2029 名豁免自付的退伍军人和 2029 名非豁免自付的退伍军人。主要结局指标是自付额增加前 12 个月和增加后 23 个月的药物依从性。采用广义估计方程,控制时间、自付豁免、时间和自付豁免之间的相互作用以及患者人口统计学、地点和其他因素,采用差异中的差异方法评估依从性差异。

结果

所有退伍军人在短期内对所有药物的依从性都有所提高,但在长期内(2003 年 2 月至 12 月)则有所下降。在所有 3 个队列中,豁免和非豁免退伍军人在预期间和后期间的依从性变化差异显著,需要支付自付费用的退伍军人的不依从性随着时间的推移而增加。对于需要支付自付费用的糖尿病退伍军人来说,自付额增加的影响尤其不利。

结论

5 美元的自付额增加(从 2 美元增加到 7 美元)对需要支付自付费用的服用口服降糖药、降压药或他汀类药物的退伍军人的药物依从性产生了不利影响。

相似文献

1
Increasing copayments and adherence to diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemic medications.增加共付额与糖尿病、高血压和高脂血症药物的依从性。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan 1;16(1):e20-34.
2
Does medication adherence following a copayment increase differ by disease burden?药物依从性在共付额增加后是否因疾病负担而异?
Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec;46(6pt1):1963-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01286.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
3
Effect of increased copayments on pharmacy use in the Department of Veterans Affairs.增加自付费用对退伍军人事务部药房使用情况的影响。
Med Care. 2007 Nov;45(11):1090-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180ca95be.
4
Effect of a medication copayment increase in veterans with schizophrenia.增加药物自付费用对退伍军人精神分裂症患者的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):335-46.
5
Copayment level and compliance with antihypertensive medication: analysis and policy implications for managed care.共付保险额水平与抗高血压药物的依从性:管理式医疗的分析及政策影响
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Nov;12(11):678-83.
6
Lowering copayments: impact of simvastatin patent expiration on patient adherence.降低自付费用:辛伐他汀专利到期对患者依从性的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Dec;14(12):813-8.
7
Impact of a prescription copayment increase on lipid-lowering medication adherence in veterans.处方自付费用增加对退伍军人降脂药物依从性的影响。
Circulation. 2009 Jan 27;119(3):390-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.783944. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
8
The impact of Medicare Part D on medication adherence among older adults enrolled in Medicare-Advantage products.医疗保险 D 部分对参加医疗保险优势产品的老年人用药依从性的影响。
Med Care. 2010 May;48(5):409-17. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d68978.
9
Antihypertensive medication adherence in the Department of Veterans Affairs.美国退伍军人事务部的抗高血压药物依从性
Am J Med. 2007 Jan;120(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.06.028.
10
Impact of Medicaid prescription copayments on use of antipsychotics and other medications in patients with schizophrenia.医疗补助处方药共付额对精神分裂症患者抗精神病药和其他药物使用的影响。
J Med Econ. 2017 Dec;20(12):1252-1260. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1365720. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Unlocking health equity by eliminating copayments for essential antihypertensive medications.通过消除基本降压药物的自付费用来实现健康公平。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 30;81:103094. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103094. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Association of Economic Policies With Hypertension Management and Control: A Systematic Review.经济政策与高血压管理和控制的关联:系统评价。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Feb 2;5(2):e235231. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5231.
3
Association of Unmet Social Needs With Metformin Use Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.
未满足的社会需求与 2 型糖尿病患者使用二甲双胍之间的关联。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Nov 1;46(11):2044-2049. doi: 10.2337/dc23-0448.
4
Impact of list price changes on out-of-pocket costs and adherence in four high-rebate specialty drugs.四种高回扣专科药物的标价变化对自付费用和依从性的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 19;18(1):e0280570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280570. eCollection 2023.
5
Associations between socioeconomic status and adherence to hypertension treatment among older adults in urban and rural areas in Myanmar: a cross-sectional study using baseline data from the JAGES in Myanmar prospective cohort study.缅甸城乡老年人社会经济地位与高血压治疗依从性的关系:基于缅甸 JAGES 前瞻性队列研究基线数据的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 17;13(1):e065370. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065370.
6
Interventions for Adherence Improvement in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases: Expert Consensus Statement.心血管疾病一级预防中提高依从性的干预措施:专家共识声明
Korean Circ J. 2022 Jan;52(1):1-33. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0226.
7
The Effect of Zero Copayments on Medication Adherence in a Community Pharmacy Setting.零自付费用对社区药房环境中药物依从性的影响。
Innov Pharm. 2019 Aug 31;10(2). doi: 10.24926/iip.v10i2.1633. eCollection 2019.
8
Access and adherence to medications for the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in Singapore: a qualitative study.新加坡动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病一级和二级预防用药的可及性与依从性:一项定性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Nov 22;12:2481-2498. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S176256. eCollection 2018.
9
Effect of Medication Copayment on Adherence and Discontinuation in Medicare Beneficiaries with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Administrative Claims Database Analysis.药物自付费用对医疗保险受益的2型糖尿病患者依从性和停药情况的影响:一项回顾性行政索赔数据库分析
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Oct;9(5):1979-1993. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0489-y. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
10
Improving adherence to high-value medications through prescription cost-sharing policies.通过处方费用分摊政策提高对高价值药物的依从性。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Nov;27(11):868-870. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007916. Epub 2018 Apr 19.