Suppr超能文献

采用自攻型骨凿行牙种植术中牙槽嵴扩张的风险因素回顾性研究。

A retrospective study of the risk factors for ridge expansion with self-tapping osteotomes in dental implant surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):203-10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze the risk factors associated with the survival of self-threading implants placed with the ridge expansion technique using self-tapping osteotomes after at least 24 months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study followed patients for at least 2 years in whom implants had been inserted by means of the ridge expansion technique. The patient was taken as the unit of analysis, and the loss of any implant as a result of mobility at any time during the follow-up period was considered as a failure. A number of patient variables were recorded: sociodemographic (age/sex), anatomical (bone quantity/quality, expansion zone), infection history (prior antibiotic therapy for active infection), prosthodontic (type of provisional prosthesis and type of definitive rehabilitation), and surgical (number of surgical stages, the use of biomaterials or atraumatic maxillary sinus elevation). Risk factors were expressed as values of relative risk (RR) and the odds ratio.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients (157 implants) were followed over a mean period of 38.8 ± 7.7 months. Most patients (91.9%) did not lose any implants, and failures occurred mainly after implant loading (5.4%). Sociodemographic factors (sex and age) were not associated with a significant risk of implant failure. However, the existence of previous local infection (RR = 34.0), the use of an immediate fixed provisional prosthesis (RR = 15.0), and type D3 bone (RR = 5.1) were seen to be the main risk factors involved in this technique for the period assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of failure when implants are placed using self-tapping osteotomes was highest in patients who had active local infection; immediate provisionalization and less dense bone were also associated with additional risk of failure.

摘要

目的

分析至少 24 个月后使用自攻式骨凿进行牙槽嵴扩展技术植入自攻螺纹种植体的存活率相关的风险因素。

材料与方法

本回顾性研究对至少 2 年随访的患者进行研究,这些患者通过牙槽嵴扩展技术植入了种植体。将患者作为分析单位,在随访期间任何时候因活动导致任何种植体丧失均视为失败。记录了一些患者变量:社会人口统计学(年龄/性别)、解剖学(骨量/质量、扩展区)、感染史(活动性感染的先前抗生素治疗)、修复体(临时修复体的类型和最终修复体的类型)和手术(手术阶段的数量、生物材料的使用或无创性上颌窦提升)。风险因素表示为相对风险(RR)和比值比。

结果

74 例患者(157 个种植体)平均随访 38.8 ± 7.7 个月。大多数患者(91.9%)未失去任何种植体,失败主要发生在种植体负荷后(5.4%)。社会人口统计学因素(性别和年龄)与种植体失败的风险无显著相关性。然而,先前局部感染的存在(RR=34.0)、使用即刻固定临时修复体(RR=15.0)和 D3 型骨(RR=5.1)被认为是该技术在评估期内的主要风险因素。

结论

使用自攻式骨凿植入种植体时,患有活动性局部感染的患者失败风险最高;即刻临时修复和密度较低的骨也与额外的失败风险相关。

相似文献

5
Effect of the osteotome technique in cases of deficient edentulous ridge.骨凿技术在无牙颌骨量不足病例中的效果。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Oct;69(10):2557-63. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.103. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验