Leemans L, Heylen N, Quanten A, Deferme S
aMACE bvba.
J Pharm Belg. 2011 Dec(4):109-16.
The aim of this study was to get a clear idea of the reading frequency of the patient information leaflet (PIL) and to set up a profile of the reader in specific. Apart from that, we also wanted to evaluate the impact of the internet in the patient's search for information on health and medication. Do patients consult the digital PIL and is the FAGG website known by common people? In order to answer these research questions, a specific inquiry was performed in 800 respondents. Some interesting conclusions can be drawn: only one out of four participants reads the full PIL when purchasing a medicine they never used before. People who always read the PIL are mainly older than 65. However, the largest amount of people who never reads the PIL is also situated in the plus 65 scale. In general, men show little interest in reading the PIL unlike woman, who read clearly more often the PIL. The parts of the PIL most often read by patients are the sections on dosage (section 3) and side effects (section 4). Unfortunately, too little attention is paid to the section 2, which contains the most warnings, such as contra-indications. The most important reason why the PIL is not read is because patients believe they get sufficient information from the doctor and the pharmacist. Another remark is that the internet is used by more than half of the respondents to search for health-related information. There is also a remarkable difference between men and woman, men rarely search for health information or information on medicines on the internet. The number of respondents searching for leaflets on the internet is quite limited. Additionally, the Federal Agency Medicines and Health Products (FAMHP) website is unknown to most internet users. We can conclude that the actual PIL is read too little. In order to make the PIL more appealing and even more patient friendly than it is actually, taking patients' needs into account should be a priority. The digital leaflet should be drawn attention to in order for patients to make more use of the information that is available to them.
本研究的目的是清楚了解患者信息传单(PIL)的阅读频率,并具体勾勒出读者的形象。除此之外,我们还想评估互联网在患者搜索健康和药物信息方面的影响。患者是否会查阅数字PIL,普通人是否知晓FAGG网站?为了回答这些研究问题,我们对800名受访者进行了一项特定调查。可以得出一些有趣的结论:在购买他们之前从未使用过的药物时,只有四分之一的参与者会阅读完整的PIL。总是阅读PIL的人主要是65岁以上的老年人。然而,从不阅读PIL的人数最多的也是65岁以上人群。一般来说,男性对阅读PIL的兴趣不大,而女性则明显更常阅读PIL。患者最常阅读的PIL部分是剂量(第3节)和副作用(第4节)。不幸的是,对包含最多警告(如禁忌症)的第2节关注太少。不阅读PIL的最重要原因是患者认为他们从医生和药剂师那里获得了足够的信息。另一个发现是,超过一半的受访者使用互联网搜索与健康相关的信息。男性和女性之间也存在显著差异,男性很少在互联网上搜索健康信息或药物信息。在互联网上搜索传单的受访者数量相当有限。此外,大多数互联网用户不知道联邦药品和健康产品局(FAMHP)网站。我们可以得出结论,实际阅读PIL的人太少。为了使PIL比实际更具吸引力且对患者更友好,应优先考虑患者的需求。应该关注数字传单,以便患者更多地利用他们可获得的信息。