• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新一代依维莫司洗脱支架与早期药物洗脱支架相比的极晚期冠状动脉支架血栓形成:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Very late coronary stent thrombosis of a newer-generation everolimus-eluting stent compared with early-generation drug-eluting stents: a prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Circulation. 2012 Mar 6;125(9):1110-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.058560. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.058560
PMID:22302840
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early-generation drug-eluting stents releasing sirolimus (SES) or paclitaxel (PES) are associated with increased risk of very late stent thrombosis occurring >1 year after stent implantation. It is unknown whether the risk of very late stent thrombosis persists with newer-generation everolimus-eluting stents (EES).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We assessed the risk of stent thrombosis in a cohort of 12 339 patients with unrestricted use of drug-eluting stents (3819 SES, 4308 PES, 4212 EES). Results are incidence rates per 100 person-years after inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for group differences. During follow-up of up to 4 years, the overall incidence rate of definite stent thrombosis was lower with EES (1.4 per 100 person-years) compared with SES (2.9; hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.62; P<0.0001) and PES (4.4; hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.48; P<0.0001). The incidence rate per 100 person-years of early (0-30 days), late (31 days-1 year), and very late stent thrombosis amounted to 0.6, 0.1, and 0.6 among EES-treated patients; 1.0, 0.3, and 1.6 among SES-treated patients; and 1.3, 0.7, and 2.4 among PES-treated patients. Differences in favor of EES were most pronounced beyond 1 year, with a hazard ratio of 0.33 (EES versus SES; P=0.006) and 0.34 (EES versus PES; P<0.0001). There was a lower risk of cardiac death or myocardial with EES compared with PES (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.75; P<0.0001), which was directly related to the lower risk of stent thrombosis-associated events (EES versus PES: hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.57).

CONCLUSION

Current treatment with EES is associated with a lower risk of very late stent thrombosis compared with early-generation drug-eluting stents.

摘要

背景

第一代药物洗脱支架(雷帕霉素洗脱支架[SES]或紫杉醇洗脱支架[PES])释放的药物与支架植入 1 年后发生极晚期支架血栓形成的风险增加有关。尚不清楚新一代依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)是否会持续存在极晚期支架血栓形成的风险。

方法和结果

我们评估了 12339 例无限制使用药物洗脱支架(3819 例 SES、4308 例 PES、4212 例 EES)患者队列中支架血栓形成的风险。结果为经逆概率治疗加权后调整组间差异的每 100 人年的发生率。在长达 4 年的随访期间,EES(1.4/100 人年)的总体明确支架血栓形成发生率低于 SES(2.9;危险比,0.41;95%置信区间,0.27-0.62;P<0.0001)和 PES(4.4;危险比,0.33;95%置信区间,0.23-0.48;P<0.0001)。EES 治疗患者的早期(0-30 天)、晚期(31 天-1 年)和极晚期支架血栓形成的发生率分别为 0.6、0.1 和 0.6;SES 治疗患者分别为 1.0、0.3 和 1.6;PES 治疗患者分别为 1.3、0.7 和 2.4。EES 治疗的优势在 1 年以上最为明显,SES 与 SES 相比的危险比为 0.33(P=0.006),EES 与 PES 相比的危险比为 0.34(P<0.0001)。EES 治疗的心脏死亡或心肌梗死风险低于 PES(危险比,0.65;95%置信区间,0.56-0.75;P<0.0001),这与支架血栓形成相关事件风险较低直接相关(EES 与 PES 相比:危险比,0.36;95%置信区间,0.23-0.57)。

结论

与第一代药物洗脱支架相比,目前 EES 的治疗与极晚期支架血栓形成的风险降低有关。

相似文献

1
Very late coronary stent thrombosis of a newer-generation everolimus-eluting stent compared with early-generation drug-eluting stents: a prospective cohort study.新一代依维莫司洗脱支架与早期药物洗脱支架相比的极晚期冠状动脉支架血栓形成:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Circulation. 2012 Mar 6;125(9):1110-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.058560. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
2
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial.依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的随机对照比较:来自Xience V依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗初发原发性冠状动脉病变患者的临床评估(SPIRIT)III试验的两年临床随访
Circulation. 2009 Feb 10;119(5):680-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.803528. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
3
Three-year outcomes following sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in an unselected population with coronary artery disease (from the REWARDS Registry).在冠状动脉疾病的未选择人群中,比较雷帕霉素洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架 3 年临床结果(REWARDS 注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Aug 15;106(4):504-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.04.001.
4
Short- and long-term outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal coronary stents: a mixed-treatment comparison analysis of 117 762 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials.药物洗脱支架和金属裸支架的短期和长期结果:来自随机试验的 117762 患者年随访的混合治疗比较分析。
Circulation. 2012 Jun 12;125(23):2873-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.097014. Epub 2012 May 14.
5
Long-term outcome of the unrestricted use of everolimus-eluting stents compared to sirolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic patients: the Bern-Rotterdam diabetes cohort study.在糖尿病患者中,与依维莫司洗脱支架和紫杉醇洗脱支架相比,无限制使用依维莫司洗脱支架的长期结果:伯尔尼-鹿特丹糖尿病队列研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Dec 5;170(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
6
Twelve-month clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stent as compared to paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stent in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架和西罗莫司洗脱支架的 12 个月临床结果比较:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2011 Jul 1;150(1):84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.01.015. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
7
Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for treatment of bare metal stent restenosis.依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗金属裸支架再狭窄。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Aug 15;108(4):518-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.080. Epub 2011 May 31.
8
Everolimus-eluting stents versus sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year results from the Guthrie Health Off-Label Stent (GHOST) registry.依维莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司或紫杉醇洗脱支架的比较:Guthrie 卫生保健非适应证支架(GHOST)注册研究的 2 年结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2013 Apr;26(2):153-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2013.12016.x. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
9
The everolimus-eluting stent in real-world patients: 6-month follow-up of the X-SEARCH (Xience V Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiac Hospital) registry.真实世界患者中的依维莫司洗脱支架:X-SEARCH(鹿特丹心脏医院评估的Xience V支架)注册研究的6个月随访
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 14;54(3):269-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.016.
10
Outcomes after unrestricted use of everolimus-eluting stent compared to paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents.不限定使用依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇和西罗莫司洗脱支架的临床结果比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Jun 15;107(12):1757-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.330. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Different Stent Strategies in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中不同支架策略的安全性和有效性:一项网状Meta分析
JACC Adv. 2025 Mar;4(3):101600. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101600. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Three Different New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in the Randomised BIO-RESORT Trial at 3 Years.在随机化的BIO-RESORT试验中三种不同新一代药物洗脱支架3年的成本效益
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Jan;9(1):137-145. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00539-x. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
3
Treatment Modifications in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Treated with Ticagrelor: Insights from the FORCE-ACS Registry.
替格瑞洛治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的治疗调整:来自FORCE-ACS注册研究的见解
Thromb Haemost. 2025 Jun;125(6):597-606. doi: 10.1055/a-2421-8866. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
4
Short-term (1-3 months) versus standard (12 months) dual antiplatelet therapy following new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.新一代药物洗脱支架置入后短期(1-3 个月)与标准(12 个月)双联抗血小板治疗的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 31;103(22):e38071. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038071.
5
Provisional or 2-Stent Technique for Bifurcation Lesions in the Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Era.第二代药物洗脱支架时代分叉病变的临时或双支架技术
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Sep 30;1(5):100410. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100410. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
6
Is Stent Thrombosis a Genetic Disease?支架内血栓形成是一种遗传性疾病吗?
JACC Adv. 2023 Jan 27;2(1):100194. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100194. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Temporal Trends in the Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Zotarolimus Eluting Stents Versus Everolimus Eluting Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.载有佐他莫司的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与依维莫司洗脱支架的时间趋势:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Jun;47(6):e24306. doi: 10.1002/clc.24306.
8
Importance of Short-Term Neointimal Coverage of Drug-Eluting Stents in the Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.药物洗脱支架短期新生内膜覆盖在双联抗血小板治疗持续时间中的重要性。
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 17;13(6):1730. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061730.
9
Very Late Stent Thrombosis Complicating Immune Thrombocytopenia: Insights From Optical Coherence Tomography and Thrombopathology.免疫性血小板减少症并发极晚期支架血栓形成:光学相干断层扫描和血栓病理学的见解
JACC Case Rep. 2023 Sep 12;24:102017. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2023.102017. eCollection 2023 Oct 18.
10
Is It Really Safe to Discontinue Antiplatelet Therapy 12 Months After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation?心房颤动患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗12个月后停用抗血小板治疗真的安全吗?
Interv Cardiol. 2023 Jun 13;18:e22. doi: 10.15420/icr.2022.40. eCollection 2023.