• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国皮肤科部门自身免疫性大疱性疾病的诊断。

Diagnostics of autoimmune bullous diseases in German dermatology departments.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, University of Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012 Jul;10(7):492-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2011.07840.x. Epub 2012 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1111/j.1610-0387.2011.07840.x
PMID:22304433
Abstract

BACKGROUND

No consistent data are available on the currently employed diagnostic tools for autoimmune bullous diseases in Germany. The aim of this survey was to describe currently performed diagnostic methods for bullous autoimmune diseases in German dermatology departments.

METHODS

A standardized questionnaire evaluated the available diagnostic methods i. e. direct immunofluorescence microscopy (IFM), indirect IFM, commercial ELISA systems, and non-commercial serological tests as well as the number of samples per year in all 34 university and 39 non-university dermatology departments.

RESULTS

The overall return rate was 89 %, 100 % and 79 % for the university and non-university departments, respectively. Direct IFM was the most frequently used method and was applied in 98 % of the responding departments. In 74 % of the responding departments, indirect IFM was used mainly on monkey esophagus and human salt-split skin. Commercial ELISA systems were employed in 58 % of the clinics; all of them used anti-desmoglein ELISA, while anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 ELISA were established in 49 % and 48 % of departments, respectively. Non-commercial analytic methods were only performed in 22 % of the departments.

CONCLUSIONS

The high return rate of this survey allows a relatively precise description of the current diagnostic methods used in German dermatology departments. Standard diagnostic tests are available nationwide and in bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus, the antigen-specific detection of autoantibodies is routinely performed in half of the departments. Rare disorders may be diagnosed by cooperation with some specialized centers.

摘要

背景

目前在德国,尚无针对自身免疫性大疱性疾病的诊断工具的一致性数据。本调查的目的是描述德国皮肤科部门目前用于大疱性自身免疫性疾病的诊断方法。

方法

标准化问卷评估了现有的诊断方法,即直接免疫荧光显微镜检查(IFM)、间接 IFM、商业 ELISA 系统和非商业血清学检测,以及每年在所有 34 所大学和 39 所非大学皮肤科部门进行的样本数量。

结果

大学和非大学部门的总回复率分别为 89%、100%和 79%。直接 IFM 是最常用的方法,在 98%的应答部门中使用。在 74%的应答部门中,间接 IFM 主要用于猴食管和人盐裂皮肤。商业 ELISA 系统在 58%的诊所中使用;它们都使用抗桥粒芯糖蛋白 ELISA,而抗 BP180 和抗 BP230 ELISA 分别在 49%和 48%的部门中建立。非商业分析方法仅在 22%的部门中进行。

结论

本调查的高回复率允许对德国皮肤科部门目前使用的诊断方法进行相对精确的描述。全国范围内都有标准诊断测试,在大疱性类天疱疮和天疱疮中,一半的部门常规检测自身抗体的抗原特异性。罕见疾病可能通过与一些专门中心的合作进行诊断。

相似文献

1
Diagnostics of autoimmune bullous diseases in German dermatology departments.德国皮肤科部门自身免疫性大疱性疾病的诊断。
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012 Jul;10(7):492-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2011.07840.x. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
2
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in autoimmune blistering diseases: preliminary experience of the Dermatology Department of Cagliari.自身免疫性水疱病的酶联免疫吸附测定:卡利亚里皮肤科的初步经验
G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2008 Feb;143(1):1-8.
3
Results of a survey of German dermatologists on the therapeutic approaches to pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid.德国皮肤科医生关于天疱疮和大疱性类天疱疮治疗方法的调查结果
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2009 Mar;7(3):227-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2008.06872.x.
4
Evaluation of a BP180-NC16a enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the initial diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid.BP180-NC16a酶联免疫吸附测定法在大疱性类天疱疮初始诊断中的评估
Br J Dermatol. 2004 Jul;151(1):126-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06082.x.
5
Autoantibody detection in bullous pemphigoid: clinical evaluation of the EUROPLUS™ Dermatology Mosaic.大疱性类天疱疮自身抗体检测:EUROPLUS™皮肤病学镶嵌的临床评估。
J Immunol Methods. 2012 Aug 31;382(1-2):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 May 9.
6
Place of human amniotic membrane immunoblotting in the diagnosis of autoimmune bullous dermatoses.人羊膜免疫印迹在自身免疫性大疱性皮肤病诊断中的地位。
Br J Dermatol. 2010 Apr;162(4):743-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09566.x. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
7
Performance profiles of German university dermatology departments.德国大学皮肤科系的绩效概况。
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2013 Feb;11(2):170-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2012.08070.x. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
8
Comparison of the EUROIMMUN Dermatology Profile ELISA to the novel BIOCHIP Mosaic 7 for the diagnosis of immunobullous skin disease.比较 EUROIMMUN 皮肤病学谱 ELISA 与新型 BIOCHIP Mosaic 7 对免疫性大疱性皮肤病的诊断价值。
Australas J Dermatol. 2021 Aug;62(3):314-322. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13611. Epub 2021 May 26.
9
Risk factors for relapse in patients with bullous pemphigoid in clinical remission: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study.临床缓解期大疱性类天疱疮患者复发的危险因素:一项多中心、前瞻性队列研究。
Arch Dermatol. 2009 May;145(5):537-42. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.53.
10
Modern diagnosis of autoimmune blistering skin diseases.自身免疫性疱病的现代诊断。
Autoimmun Rev. 2010 Dec;10(2):84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Autoimmunity against laminin 332.抗层粘连蛋白 332 的自身免疫
Front Immunol. 2023 Aug 10;14:1250115. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1250115. eCollection 2023.
2
Bullous Autoimmune Dermatoses–Clinical Features, Diagnostic Evaluation, and Treatment Options.大疱性自身免疫性皮肤病——临床特征、诊断评估和治疗选择。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Jun 18;118(24):413-420. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0136.
3
Assessment of Diagnostic Strategy for Early Recognition of Bullous and Nonbullous Variants of Pemphigoid.大疱性类天疱疮和非大疱性类天疱疮的早期识别诊断策略评估。
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Feb 1;155(2):158-165. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4390.
4
Diagnosis of Autoimmune Blistering Diseases.自身免疫性水疱病的诊断
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Nov 2;5:296. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00296. eCollection 2018.
5
[Bullous pemphigoid: diagnosis and therapy].[大疱性类天疱疮:诊断与治疗]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2014 Sep;164(17-18):363-71. doi: 10.1007/s10354-014-0294-9. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
6
[Bullous pemphigoid].[大疱性类天疱疮]
Hautarzt. 2013 Dec;64(12):931-43; quiz 944-5. doi: 10.1007/s00105-013-2599-9.