Suppr超能文献

为南非艾滋病毒感染者提供抗逆转录病毒治疗时决策者的优先事项:一项定性评估。

Decision maker priorities for providing antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected South Africans: a qualitative assessment.

作者信息

Kimmel April D, Daniels Norman, Betancourt Theresa S, Wood Robin, Prosser Lisa A

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Care. 2012;24(6):778-92. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.630366. Epub 2012 Feb 3.

Abstract

In resource-limited settings, successful HIV treatment scale-up has been tempered by reports of funding shortfalls. We aimed to determine the priorities, including ethical considerations, of decision makers for HIV antiretroviral programs. We conducted qualitative interviews with 12 decision makers, identified using purposive sampling. Respondents engaged in one-on-one, semi-structured interviews. We developed an interview guide to direct questions about key priorities and motivations for decision making about HIV antiretroviral programs. We evaluated textual data from the interviews to identify themes. Among 12 respondents, 10 (83%) lived and worked in South Africa. Respondents came from Western Cape, Gauteng, and KwaZulu-Natal provinces and worked primarily in urban settings. The respondents supported prioritizing individual patients based on treatment adherence, pregnancy status to prevent maternal-to-child HIV transmission and/or orphans, and severity of illness. However, priorities based on severity of illness varied, with first-come/first-serve, prioritization of the most severely ill, and prioritization of the least severely ill discussed. Respondents opposed prioritizing based on patient socioeconomic characteristics. Other priorities included the number of persons receiving treatment; how treated patients are distributed in the population (e.g., urban/rural); and treatment policy (e.g., number of antiretroviral regimens). Motivations included humanitarian concerns; personal responsibility for individual patients; and clinical outcomes (e.g., patient-level morbidity/mortality, saving lives) and/or social outcomes (e.g., restoring patients as functional family members). Decision makers have a wide range of priorities for antiretroviral provision in South Africa, and the motivations underlying these priorities suggest at times conflicting ethical considerations for providing HIV treatment when resources are limited.

摘要

在资源有限的环境中,有关资金短缺的报道阻碍了扩大艾滋病毒治疗规模的成功进程。我们旨在确定艾滋病毒抗逆转录病毒项目决策者的优先事项,包括伦理考量。我们通过立意抽样确定了12名决策者,并对他们进行了定性访谈。受访者参与了一对一的半结构化访谈。我们制定了一份访谈指南,以指导有关艾滋病毒抗逆转录病毒项目决策的关键优先事项和动机的问题。我们评估了访谈的文本数据以确定主题。在12名受访者中,10名(83%)在南非生活和工作。受访者来自西开普省、豪登省和夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省,主要在城市地区工作。受访者支持根据治疗依从性、预防母婴艾滋病毒传播的妊娠状况和/或孤儿身份以及疾病严重程度对个体患者进行优先排序。然而,基于疾病严重程度的优先排序各不相同,讨论了先来先服务、优先治疗最严重疾病患者和优先治疗最不严重疾病患者的情况。受访者反对根据患者的社会经济特征进行优先排序。其他优先事项包括接受治疗的人数;接受治疗的患者在人群中的分布情况(如城市/农村);以及治疗政策(如抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的数量)。动机包括人道主义关切;对个体患者的个人责任;以及临床结果(如患者层面的发病率/死亡率、挽救生命)和/或社会结果(如使患者恢复为有功能的家庭成员)。在南非,决策者在抗逆转录病毒药物供应方面有广泛的优先事项,这些优先事项背后的动机表明,在资源有限的情况下提供艾滋病毒治疗时,有时存在相互冲突的伦理考量。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Sample size in qualitative research.定性研究中的样本量
Res Nurs Health. 1995 Apr;18(2):179-83. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770180211.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验