Acharya Sanjaya, Shrestha Manash, Thang Ngo Duc, Wini Lyndes, Habib M Naeem, Neukom Josselyn, Lhazeen Karma, Lynch Caroline A, Thriemer Kamala
Global Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.
Asia Pacific Malaria Elimination Network (APMEN) Vivax Working Group, Singapore, Singapore.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 22;4(5):e0002970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002970. eCollection 2024.
Designing policy in public health is a complex process requiring decision making that incorporates available evidence and is suitable to a country's epidemiological and health system context. The main objective of this study was to develop an options assessment toolkit (OAT) to provide a pragmatic and evidence-based approach to the development of policies for the radical cure (prevention of relapse) of vivax malaria for national malaria control programs in the Asia-Pacific region. The OAT was developed using participatory research methods and a Delphi process using a sequential multi-phase design, adapted with a pre-development phase, a development phase, and a final development phase. In the pre-development phase, a literature review was conducted to inform the toolkit development. Data collection in the development phase consisted of core research team discussions, multiple rounds of consultation with participants from National Malaria Control Programs (NMP) (online and in person), and two separate modified e-Delphi processes with experts. The final development phase was the piloting of the toolkit during the annual meeting of the Asia Pacific Malaria Elimination Network (APMEN) Vivax Working Group. We developed a tool kit containing the following elements: i) Baseline Assessment Tool (BAT) to assess the readiness of NMPs for new or improved coverage of radical cure, ii) eight scenarios representative of Asia Pacific region, iii) matching test and treat options based on available options for G6PD testing and radical cure for the given scenarios, iv) an approaches tool to allow NMPs to visualize considerations for policy change process and different implementation strategies/approaches for each test and treat option. The OAT can support vivax radical cure policy formulation among NMPs and stakeholders tailoring for their unique country context. Future studies are needed to assess the utility and practicality of using the OAT for specific country context.
制定公共卫生政策是一个复杂的过程,需要进行决策,将现有证据纳入其中,并适合一个国家的流行病学和卫生系统背景。本研究的主要目标是开发一个选项评估工具包(OAT),为亚太地区国家疟疾控制项目制定间日疟根治(预防复发)政策提供一种务实且基于证据的方法。OAT是采用参与式研究方法和德尔菲法开发的,采用了顺序多阶段设计,并经过了预开发阶段、开发阶段和最终开发阶段。在预开发阶段,进行了文献综述以为工具包的开发提供信息。开发阶段的数据收集包括核心研究团队讨论、与国家疟疾控制项目(NMP)的参与者进行多轮磋商(线上和线下),以及与专家进行两轮单独的改良电子德尔菲法。最终开发阶段是在亚太疟疾消除网络(APMEN)间日疟工作组年度会议期间对该工具包进行试点。我们开发了一个包含以下要素的工具包:i)基线评估工具(BAT),用于评估NMP对新的或改进的根治覆盖范围的准备情况;ii)代表亚太地区的八个情景;iii)根据给定情景下G6PD检测和根治的可用选项匹配检测和治疗选项;iv)一个方法工具,使NMP能够直观了解政策变化过程的考虑因素以及每个检测和治疗选项的不同实施策略/方法。OAT可以支持NMP和利益相关者根据其独特的国家背景制定间日疟根治政策。未来需要开展研究,以评估在特定国家背景下使用OAT的效用和实用性。