Suppr超能文献

法律责任与研究伦理委员会:神经影像学与偶发发现案例。

Legal liability and research ethics boards: the case of neuroimaging and incidental findings.

机构信息

Health Law and Science Policy Group (HeaLS), University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2H5.

出版信息

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012 Mar-Apr;35(2):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

Abstract

Neuroimaging research covers a wide range of intriguing issues from revealing brain structures to investigating what happens in our brain when we lie. The field appears to be thriving, but skepticism and alertness to the various ethical, scientific, policy and philosophical challenges associated with it also appear to be on the rise. One particularly complex issue concerns what to do with incidental findings that emerge during the course of neuroimaging research. Research ethics boards (REBs) play a central role in research oversight. In this paper, we will consider some of the potential issues associated with REB liability in negligence in the context of incidental findings in neuroimaging research.

摘要

神经影像学研究涵盖了从揭示大脑结构到研究我们说谎时大脑内部活动等一系列有趣的问题。该领域似乎正在蓬勃发展,但人们对与之相关的各种伦理、科学、政策和哲学挑战的怀疑和警惕似乎也在上升。一个特别复杂的问题涉及在神经影像学研究过程中出现的偶然发现该如何处理。研究伦理委员会(REB)在研究监督中起着核心作用。在本文中,我们将考虑在神经影像学研究中的偶然发现的背景下,与研究伦理委员会在疏忽中的赔偿责任相关的一些潜在问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验