School of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012 Feb 3;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-7.
Sitting pivot transfer (SPT) is one of the most important, but at the same time strenuous at the upper extremity, functional task for spinal cord injured individuals. In order to better teach this task to those individuals and to improve performance, a better biomechanical understanding during the different SPT phases is a prerequisite. However, no consensus has yet been reached on how to depict the different phases of the SPT. The definition of the phases of the SPT, along with the events characterizing these phases, will facilitate the interpretation of biomechanical outcome measures related to the performance of SPTs as well as strengthen the evidence generated across studies.
Thirty-five individuals with a spinal cord injury performed two SPTs between seats of similar height using their usual SPT technique. Kinematics and kinetics were recorded using an instrumented transfer assessment system. Based on kinetic and kinematic measurements, a relative threshold-based algorithm was developed to identify four distinct phases: pre-lift, upper arm loading, lift-pivot and post-lift phases. To determine the stability of the algorithm between the two SPTs, Student t-tests for dependent samples were performed on the absolute duration of each phase.
The mean total duration of the SPT was 2.00 ± 0.49 s. The mean duration of the pre-lift, upper arm loading, lift-pivot and post-lift phases were 0.74 ± 0.29 s, 0.28 ± 0.13 s, 0.72 ± 0.24 s, 0.27 ± 0.14 s whereas their relative contributions represented approximately 35%, 15%, 35% and 15% of the overall SPT cycle, respectively. No significant differences were found between the trials (p = 0.480-0.891).
The relative threshold-based algorithm used to automatically detect the four distinct phases of the SPT, is rapid, accurate and repeatable. A quantitative and thorough description of the precise phases of the SPT is prerequisite to better interpret biomechanical findings and measure task performance. The algorithm could also become clinically useful to refine the assessment and training of SPTs.
坐式转移(Sitting pivot transfer,SPT)是脊髓损伤患者最重要但同时对上肢要求较高的功能性任务之一。为了更好地教授这项任务并提高其完成效果,更好地理解 SPT 不同阶段的生物力学原理是前提。然而,目前尚未就如何描述 SPT 的不同阶段达成共识。SPT 阶段的定义以及这些阶段的特征事件将有助于解释与 SPT 执行相关的生物力学结果测量,并加强跨研究产生的证据。
35 名脊髓损伤患者使用惯用的 SPT 技术在高度相似的座椅之间进行了两次 SPT。使用仪器化转移评估系统记录运动学和动力学。基于动力学和运动学测量结果,开发了一种基于相对阈值的算法来识别四个不同的阶段:预提升、上臂加载、提升-枢轴和提升后阶段。为了确定该算法在两次 SPT 之间的稳定性,对每个阶段的绝对持续时间进行了配对样本 t 检验。
SPT 的总持续时间平均值为 2.00 ± 0.49 秒。预提升、上臂加载、提升-枢轴和提升后阶段的平均持续时间分别为 0.74 ± 0.29 秒、0.28 ± 0.13 秒、0.72 ± 0.24 秒和 0.27 ± 0.14 秒,而它们的相对贡献分别约占 SPT 周期的 35%、15%、35%和 15%。两次试验之间无显著差异(p = 0.480-0.891)。
用于自动检测 SPT 四个不同阶段的基于相对阈值的算法快速、准确且可重复。对 SPT 精确阶段进行定量和全面描述是更好地解释生物力学发现和衡量任务完成情况的前提。该算法还可能在临床上变得有用,以细化 SPT 的评估和训练。