Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
Body Image. 2012 Mar;9(2):298-301. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
The purpose was to compare self-report and psychophysiological assessment techniques in the measurement of emotional response to body image cues. Female college students (n=53; % Caucasian=53.6; M body mass index=26.1 kg/m²) completed the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI-3) and viewed photos of themselves both unaltered and morphed to simulate weight gain. Response to the photos was assessed by self-report and the affect modulated startle paradigm. EDI-3 Drive for Thinness (DT) and Body Dissatisfaction (BD) scale scores were correlated with startled amplitude for the largest simulated weight gain photo. Startle eye blink amplitude predicted more variance in DT and BD subscales than self-reported response to the image. The affect modulated startle paradigm may provide unique information in the assessment of eating disorder symptomatology that cannot be captured via self-report techniques, and has potential to inform evaluation of treatment outcomes of eating and body image disorders.
目的是比较自我报告和心理生理评估技术在测量身体意象线索引起的情绪反应中的应用。女大学生(n=53;%白种人=53.6;M 体重指数=26.1kg/m²)完成了饮食失调问卷(EDI-3),并观看了自己未经修饰和变形为模拟体重增加的照片。通过自我报告和情绪调制的 startle 范式评估对照片的反应。EDI-3 的瘦身欲望(DT)和身体不满(BD)量表得分与模拟体重增加最大的照片的 startle 振幅相关。与自我报告的图像反应相比,startle 眨眼振幅预测了 DT 和 BD 分量表中更多的方差。情绪调制的 startle 范式可能会在评估饮食障碍症状方面提供无法通过自我报告技术获得的独特信息,并有可能为饮食和身体意象障碍的治疗效果评估提供信息。