• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实践分析:美国放射学委员会诊断放射学考试内容效度的基础。

Practice analysis: a basis for content validity for american board of radiology examinations in diagnostic radiology.

机构信息

American Board of Radiology, Department of Psychometrics and Evaluation, 5441 E Williams Blvd, Tucson, AZ 85711, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Feb;9(2):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.08.020.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2011.08.020
PMID:22305698
Abstract

The ABR performs practice analysis every 3 years, according to its strategic plan, in an effort to strengthen the content validity of its qualifying and certifying examinations as well as its maintenance of certification examinations. A nationwide survey of diagnostic radiologists was conducted in July 2010 for the purpose of determining the critically important and frequently performed activities in 12 clinical categories. The survey instrument was distributed electronically to 17,721 members of the ACR, with a unique identification code for each individual. A 5-point scale was established for both frequency and importance variables. The frequency scale ranged from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = not applicable, 2 = occasionally, 3 = monthly, 4 = weekly, and 5 = daily. The scale for importance also ranged from 1 to 5: 1 = not applicable, 2 = not important, 3 = somewhat important, 4 = important, and 5 = essential. A total of 2,909 diagnostic radiologists (19.32%) participated. Of these, 2,233 (76.76%) indicated that they spent ≥50% of their time in clinical practice. Because of its brevity of the list of the activities, results for the gastrointestinal category are presented in this article. The list of activities weighted according to importance and frequency is presented in this article and, as illustrated, could become the foundation for developing a more detailed blueprint for the gastrointestinal category certifying examinations in diagnostic radiology. Findings on demographic information are also presented.

摘要

ABR 每 3 年根据其战略计划进行一次实践分析,努力加强其资格认证和发证考试以及维持认证考试的内容有效性。2010 年 7 月,为了确定 12 个临床类别中至关重要和经常进行的活动,对诊断放射科医生进行了一项全国性调查。调查工具以电子方式分发给 17721 名 ACR 成员,每个成员都有一个独特的识别码。为频率和重要性变量建立了 5 点量表。频率量表的范围从 1 到 5,如下所示:1 = 不适用,2 = 偶尔,3 = 每月,4 = 每周,5 = 每天。重要性量表的范围也从 1 到 5:1 = 不适用,2 = 不重要,3 = 有些重要,4 = 重要,5 = 必不可少。共有 2909 名诊断放射科医生(19.32%)参加了调查。其中,2233 名(76.76%)表示他们将≥50%的时间用于临床实践。由于胃肠道类别的活动清单简短,本文仅呈现胃肠道类别的结果。根据重要性和频率加权的活动清单在本文中呈现,如图所示,它可以成为为诊断放射学中胃肠道类别认证考试制定更详细蓝图的基础。还介绍了人口统计信息的调查结果。

相似文献

1
Practice analysis: a basis for content validity for american board of radiology examinations in diagnostic radiology.实践分析:美国放射学委员会诊断放射学考试内容效度的基础。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Feb;9(2):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.08.020.
2
American Board of Radiology diagnostic radiology initial qualifying (written) examinations.美国放射学委员会放射诊断学初始资格(笔试)考试。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jul;195(1):10-2. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.4077.
3
ABR examinations: the why, what, and how.ABR 检查:原因、内容和方法。
Radiology. 2013 Jul;268(1):219-27. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130384.
4
American Board of Radiology radiation oncology initial qualifying ("written") examinations.美国放射学会放射肿瘤学初始资格(“笔试”)考试。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2011 Mar;8(3):199-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.08.013.
5
A closer look at the American Board of Radiology practice-profiled maintenance of certification examination in diagnostic radiology.深入剖析美国放射学会诊断放射学实践剖析式继续认证考试。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jul;195(1):8-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3878.
6
American Board of Radiology: maintenance of certification.美国放射学会:认证维持
Acad Radiol. 2005 Jan;12(1):104-15. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.11.001.
7
Workload of radiologists in United States in 2006-2007 and trends since 1991-1992.2006 - 2007年美国放射科医生的工作量以及自1991 - 1992年以来的趋势。
Radiology. 2009 Aug;252(2):458-67. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2522081895. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
8
The pediatric neurosurgical workforce: defining the current supply. Clinical article.儿科神经外科医疗队伍:确定当前的人员配备。临床文章。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009 Jan;3(1):1-10. doi: 10.3171/2008.10.PEDS08255.
9
A portrait of interventional radiologists in the United States.美国介入放射科医生的画像。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Nov;185(5):1103-12. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0237.
10
Maintenance of certification.认证维持
J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Jan;2(1):22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.09.018.