Harrington-McLaughlin Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Am Heart J. 2012 Feb;163(2):260-7.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.11.014.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in reducing clinical events in systolic heart failure patients with a wide QRS. Previous retrospective studies suggest only patients with QRS prolongation due to a left bundle-branch block (LBBB) benefit from CRT. Our objective was to examine this by performing a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials of CRT.
Systematic searches of MEDLINE and the Food and Drug Administration official website were conducted for randomized controlled CRT trials. Trials reporting adverse clinical events (eg, all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalizations) according to QRS morphology were included in the meta-analysis.
Four randomized trials totaling 5,356 patients met the inclusion criteria. In patients with LBBB at baseline, there was a highly significant reduction in composite adverse clinical events with CRT (RR = 0.64 [95% CI (0.52-0.77)], P = .00001). However no such benefit was observed for patients with non-LBBB conduction abnormalities (RR = 0.97 [95% CI (0.82-1.15)], P = .75). When examined separately, there was no benefit in patients with right-bundle branch block (RR = 0.91 [95% CI (0.69-1.20)], P = .49) or non-specific intraventricular conduction delay (RR = 1.19 [95% CI (0.87-1.63)], P = .28). There was no heterogeneity among the clinical trials with regards to the lack of benefit in non-LBBB patients (I(2) = 0%). When directly compared, the difference in effect of CRT between LBBB versus non-LBBB patients was highly statistically significant (P = .0001 by heterogeneity analysis).
While CRT was very effective in reducing clinical events in patients with LBBB, it did not reduce such events in patients with wide QRS due to other conduction abnormalities.
心脏再同步治疗(CRT)在治疗宽 QRS 的收缩性心力衰竭患者中可有效减少临床事件。既往回顾性研究表明,仅因左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)而 QRS 延长的患者可从 CRT 中获益。我们的目的是通过对所有 CRT 随机对照试验进行荟萃分析来检验这一点。
系统检索 MEDLINE 和食品药品监督管理局官方网站,以获取 CRT 的随机对照试验。荟萃分析中纳入了根据 QRS 形态报告不良临床事件(如全因死亡率、心力衰竭住院率)的试验。
四项总计 5356 例患者的随机试验符合纳入标准。在基线时存在 LBBB 的患者中,CRT 显著降低了复合不良临床事件的发生率(RR = 0.64 [95%CI (0.52-0.77)],P =.00001)。然而,对于存在非 LBBB 传导异常的患者,则未观察到这种获益(RR = 0.97 [95%CI (0.82-1.15)],P =.75)。单独分析时,右束支传导阻滞(RR = 0.91 [95%CI (0.69-1.20)],P =.49)或非特异性室内传导延迟(RR = 1.19 [95%CI (0.87-1.63)],P =.28)患者中也未观察到获益。非 LBBB 患者中缺乏获益的临床试验之间无异质性(I(2) = 0%)。当直接比较时,LBBB 与非 LBBB 患者 CRT 效果的差异具有统计学显著性(异质性分析 P =.0001)。
虽然 CRT 可非常有效地减少 LBBB 患者的临床事件,但它并未减少其他传导异常导致宽 QRS 的患者的此类事件。