Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 645 N Michigan Avenue, Suite 530, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Pituitary. 2012 Dec;15(4):598-600. doi: 10.1007/s11102-012-0375-y.
There is a clinical impression that when tumors invade the cavernous sinus, compression of the internal carotid artery is rare with pituitary adenomas and more common with other types of lesions but there are no actual data to support this impression. To confirm the impression that the finding of internal carotid artery compression by tumors invading the cavernous sinus is inconsistent with a diagnosis of a pituitary adenoma, we performed a retrospective analysis of MRI scans performed between 2000 and July 2009. An initial search of the radiology database was performed using the terms "invasive mass cavernous MRI" and subsequent refinement narrowed the evaluation to 141 patients with cavernous sinus invasion by sellar/parasellar tumors for whom there were clinical/pathological data to determine tumor type. 83 of the 141 patients with cavernous sinus invasion had carotid artery encasement; 58 were pituitary adenomas and 25 were other types of lesions. Eight of these 83 scans revealed compression of the internal carotid lumen, with only one being a pituitary adenoma and seven being other types of lesions. Therefore, only 1/58 (1.7%) of pituitary adenomas and 7/25 (28%) of non-pituitary adenoma lesions that encased the internal carotid artery caused compression of the artery (P = 0.0007). A mass lesion that invades the cavernous sinus and encases the internal carotid artery is very unlikely, therefore, to be a pituitary adenoma if it compresses the lumen of the internal carotid artery.
临床上有一种印象,认为当肿瘤侵犯海绵窦时,压迫颈内动脉在垂体腺瘤中很少见,而在其他类型的病变中更为常见,但没有实际数据支持这种印象。为了证实肿瘤侵犯海绵窦导致颈内动脉受压与垂体腺瘤诊断不一致的印象,我们对 2000 年至 2009 年 7 月间进行的 MRI 扫描进行了回顾性分析。首先在放射学数据库中使用“侵袭性肿块海绵窦 MRI”等术语进行了初步搜索,随后的细化评估将范围缩小到 141 例因鞍旁/蝶旁肿瘤侵犯海绵窦而进行 MRI 扫描的患者,这些患者有临床/病理数据可确定肿瘤类型。在 141 例侵犯海绵窦的患者中,有 83 例存在颈动脉包绕,其中 58 例为垂体腺瘤,25 例为其他类型病变。这 83 例中有 8 例显示颈内动脉管腔受压,其中仅 1 例为垂体腺瘤,7 例为其他类型病变。因此,只有 1/58(1.7%)的垂体腺瘤和 7/25(28%)的非垂体腺瘤病变导致颈内动脉受压(P=0.0007)。因此,如果肿块侵犯海绵窦并包绕颈内动脉,压迫颈内动脉管腔,则极不可能是垂体腺瘤。