• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生活质量评分变化与非小细胞肺癌患者生存的关系。

Association between changes in quality of life scores and survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

机构信息

Office of Clinical Research, Cancer Treatment Centers of America at Midwestern Regional Medical Center, 2520 Elisha Avenue, Zion, IL 60099, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012 Sep;21(5):614-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2012.01332.x. Epub 2012 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2012.01332.x
PMID:22309434
Abstract

In patients with advanced cancer, quality of life is as meaningful to patients as the actual length of life. We investigated whether changes in quality of life could predict survival in non-small cell lung cancer. Quality of life was evaluated using EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire). Cox regression evaluated the prognostic significance of baseline, 3-month and changes in quality of life scores after adjusting for age, gender, treatment history and stage. Two hundred and seventeen patients were men and 213 women. One hundred and fifty-nine patients had stage III while 271 had stage IV disease. Baseline quality of life scales predictive of survival upon multivariate analysis were physical (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.98; P= 0.02) and global (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.96; P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, no change variables were significantly predictive of survival. However, in stage IV patients, change in physical function over a period of 3 months showed marginal significance such that every 10-point increase in physical function change score was associated with an 8% decreased risk of death. These findings should be used in clinical practice to systematically address quality of life-related problems of lung cancer patients throughout their treatment course.

摘要

在晚期癌症患者中,生活质量与实际寿命一样对患者有意义。我们研究了生活质量的变化是否可以预测非小细胞肺癌患者的生存情况。使用 EORTC QLQ-C30(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷)评估生活质量。Cox 回归在调整年龄、性别、治疗史和分期后,评估了基线、3 个月时以及生活质量评分变化对生存的预后意义。217 名患者为男性,213 名患者为女性。159 名患者为 III 期,271 名患者为 IV 期疾病。多变量分析中,预测生存的基线生活质量量表包括身体功能(危险比,0.90;95%置信区间,0.81-0.98;P=0.02)和总体健康状况(危险比,0.92;95%置信区间,0.87-0.96;P<0.001)。多变量分析显示,无变化变量对生存没有显著预测意义。然而,在 IV 期患者中,3 个月期间身体功能的变化具有边缘意义,即身体功能变化评分每增加 10 分,死亡风险降低 8%。这些发现应在临床实践中使用,以系统地解决肺癌患者在整个治疗过程中与生活质量相关的问题。

相似文献

1
Association between changes in quality of life scores and survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients.生活质量评分变化与非小细胞肺癌患者生存的关系。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012 Sep;21(5):614-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2012.01332.x. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
2
Quality of life after stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.立体定向放疗治疗 I 期非小细胞肺癌后的生活质量。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 May 1;77(1):31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.080. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
3
Hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy (17 Gy per two fractions) in advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma is comparable to standard fractionation for symptom control and survival: a national phase III trial.晚期非小细胞肺癌超分割姑息性放疗(每两次分割剂量为17 Gy)在症状控制和生存方面与标准分割放疗相当:一项全国性III期试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 1;22(5):801-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.123.
4
Longitudinal health-related quality of life assessment implications for prognosis in stage IV pancreatic cancer.IV 期胰腺癌预后的纵向健康相关生活质量评估意义。
Pancreas. 2013 Mar;42(2):254-9. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31825b9f56.
5
Survival and quality of life after stereotactic or 3D-conformal radiotherapy for inoperable early-stage lung cancer.无法手术的早期肺癌立体定向或三维适形放疗后的生存和生活质量。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.052. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
6
Quality of life measures (EORTC QLQ-C30 and SF-36) as predictors of survival in palliative colorectal and lung cancer patients.生活质量测量指标(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心30条目版和简明健康状况调查量表)作为晚期结直肠癌和肺癌患者生存情况的预测指标
Palliat Support Care. 2009 Sep;7(3):289-97. doi: 10.1017/S1478951509990216.
7
Association of nutrition parameters including bioelectrical impedance and systemic inflammatory response with quality of life and prognosis in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective study.营养参数(包括生物电阻抗和全身炎症反应)与晚期非小细胞肺癌患者生活质量和预后的相关性:一项前瞻性研究。
Nutr Cancer. 2012;64(4):526-34. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2012.668744. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
8
Health-related quality of life in patients with lung cancer: validation of the Mexican-Spanish version and association with prognosis of the EORTC QLQ-LC13 questionnaire.肺癌患者的健康相关生活质量:EORTC QLQ-LC13 问卷的墨西哥西班牙语版验证及其与预后的关系。
Lung Cancer. 2012 Jul;77(1):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
9
Preoperative psychological global well being index (PGWBI) predicts postoperative quality of life for patients with non-small cell lung cancer managed with thoracic surgery.术前心理总体幸福感指数(PGWBI)可预测接受胸外科手术治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的术后生活质量。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Sep;30(3):548-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.05.032. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
10
Evaluating quality of life and pulmonary function of long-term survivors of non-small cell lung cancer treated with radical or postoperative radiotherapy.评估接受根治性放疗或术后放疗的非小细胞肺癌长期存活者的生活质量和肺功能。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb;32(1):65-72. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31817e6ec2.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognosis and risk factor assessment of patients with advanced lung cancer with low socioeconomic status: model development and validation.低社会经济地位的晚期肺癌患者的预后和风险因素评估:模型的建立和验证。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 10;24(1):1128. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12863-w.
2
Effects of Uncertainty, Appraisal of Uncertainty, and Self-Efficacy on the Quality of Life of Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy: Based on Mishel's Theory of Uncertainty.基于米舍尔不确定性理论的化疗老年肺癌患者不确定性、不确定性评估和自我效能对生活质量的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 30;59(6):1051. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061051.
3
Patient-reported outcomes with cemiplimab monotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 of ≥50%: The EMPOWER-Lung 1 study.
接受 PD-L1 表达水平≥50%的一线治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者接受西米普利单抗单药治疗的患者报告结局:EMPOWER-Lung 1 研究。
Cancer. 2023 Jan 1;129(1):118-129. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34477. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
4
Prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in adults with non-small cell Lung Cancer: a scoping review.患者报告结局测量(PROMs)在成人非小细胞肺癌中的预后价值:系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Oct 19;22(1):1076. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10151-z.
5
The predictive utility of patient-reported outcomes and performance status for survival in metastatic lung cancer patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy.患者报告的结局和体能状态对接受化疗免疫治疗的转移性肺癌患者生存的预测效用。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2022 Mar;11(3):432-439. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-938.
6
Prognostic effects of health-related quality of life at baseline and early change in health-related quality of life on response to treatment and survival in patients with advanced lung cancer: a prospective observational study in China.基线健康相关生活质量和健康相关生活质量早期变化对晚期肺癌患者治疗反应和生存的预后影响:中国的一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 14;12(2):e047611. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047611.
7
Coping, mood and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study in Chinese patients with advanced lung cancer.应对方式、情绪与健康相关生活质量:一项针对中国晚期肺癌患者的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 5;9(5):e023672. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023672.
8
Prognostic Value of Post-diagnosis Health-Related Quality of Life for Overall Survival in Breast Cancer: Findings from a 10-Year Prospective Cohort in Korea.乳腺癌诊断后健康相关生活质量对总生存的预后价值:来自韩国 10 年前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Oct;51(4):1600-1611. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.426. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
9
Socio-demographic, Clinical, and Genetic Determinants of Quality of Life in Lung Cancer Patients.肺癌患者生活质量的社会人口学、临床和遗传决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 13;8(1):10640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25712-1.
10
A systematic review of the impact of pain on overall survival in patients with cancer.一项关于疼痛对癌症患者总生存期影响的系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 May;25(5):1687-1698. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3614-y. Epub 2017 Feb 11.