• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

争夺注意力优先级:临时目标与威胁

Competing for attentional priority: temporary goals versus threats.

机构信息

Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Emotion. 2013 Jun;13(3):587-98. doi: 10.1037/a0027204. Epub 2012 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1037/a0027204
PMID:22309730
Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that attention is biased toward threatening events. More recent evidence has also found attentional biases for stimuli that are relevant to the current and temporary goals of an individual. We examined whether goal-relevant information still evokes an attentional bias when this information competes with threatening events. In three experiments, participants performed a dot probe task combined with a separate task that induced a temporary goal. The results of Experiment 1 showed that attention was oriented to goal-relevant pictures in the dot probe task when these pictures were simultaneously presented with neutral or threatening pictures. Whether goal-relevant pictures themselves were threatening or neutral did not influence the results. Experiment 2 replicated these findings in a sample of highly trait-anxious participants. Experiment 3 showed that attention was automatically deployed to stimuli relevant to a temporary goal even in the presence of stimuli that signal imminent and genuine threat (i.e., a colored patch signaling the presentation of an aversive noise). These findings further corroborate the conclusion that an individual's current and temporary goals guide early attentional processes.

摘要

许多研究表明,注意力偏向于威胁性事件。最近的证据还发现,对于与个体当前和临时目标相关的刺激,也存在注意力偏差。我们研究了当这种信息与威胁性事件竞争时,目标相关信息是否仍然会引起注意力偏差。在三个实验中,参与者执行了一个点探测任务,同时结合了一个诱导临时目标的单独任务。实验 1 的结果表明,当目标相关的图片与中性或威胁性图片同时呈现时,注意力会指向点探测任务中的目标相关图片。目标相关图片本身是否具有威胁性或中性并不影响结果。实验 2 在高度特质焦虑的参与者样本中复制了这些发现。实验 3 表明,即使存在预示着即将到来和真正威胁的刺激(即,一个彩色补丁表示呈现令人不快的噪音),注意力也会自动分配给与临时目标相关的刺激。这些发现进一步证实了个体当前和临时目标指导早期注意力过程的结论。

相似文献

1
Competing for attentional priority: temporary goals versus threats.争夺注意力优先级:临时目标与威胁
Emotion. 2013 Jun;13(3):587-98. doi: 10.1037/a0027204. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
2
Attentional bias in high- and low-anxious individuals: evidence for threat-induced effects on engagement and disengagement.高焦虑和低焦虑个体的注意偏向:威胁引起的投入和解除投入效应的证据。
Cogn Emot. 2011 Aug;25(5):805-17. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.515065. Epub 2011 May 24.
3
Attentional bias toward fear-related stimuli: an investigation with nonselected children and adults and children with anxiety disorders.对恐惧相关刺激的注意偏向:一项针对非特定儿童、成人及焦虑症儿童的调查。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 Dec;89(4):320-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.06.003.
4
There's more to anxiety than meets the eye: isolating threat-related attentional engagement and disengagement biases.焦虑不仅仅是表面上的:分离与威胁相关的注意力投入和抽离偏见。
Emotion. 2013 Jun;13(3):520-8. doi: 10.1037/a0031236. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
5
Attentional control and the competition between nonpain goals and the threat of pain.注意控制与非痛目标和疼痛威胁之间的竞争。
Eur J Pain. 2018 Jan;22(1):181-190. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1114. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
6
Two successive phases in the threat-related attentional response of anxious subjects: neural correlates.焦虑个体威胁相关注意反应的连续两个阶段:神经相关物。
Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(12):1141-50. doi: 10.1002/da.20608.
7
Early attention processes and anxiety in children.儿童的早期注意力过程与焦虑
Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Feb;104(1):221-35. doi: 10.2466/pms.104.1.221-235.
8
Is there a mutual relationship between opposite attentional biases underlying anxiety?焦虑症的注意偏向是否存在相互关系?
Emotion. 2011 Jun;11(3):582-94. doi: 10.1037/a0022019.
9
Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures.焦虑与对威胁性图片的关注。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 Aug;54(3):665-81. doi: 10.1080/713755991.
10
Time-course of attention for threatening pictures in high and low trait anxiety.高特质焦虑和低特质焦虑个体对威胁性图片的注意力时间进程。
Behav Res Ther. 2005 Aug;43(8):1087-98. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.08.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurophysiological evidence for emotional attention modulation depending on goal relevance.基于目标相关性的情绪注意力调节的神经生理学证据。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 8;15(1):12045. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96537-y.
2
Can templates-for-rejection suppress real-world affective objects in visual search?模板排除法能否抑制视觉搜索中的真实情感对象?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1843-1855. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02410-2. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
3
Now you see it, now you don't: Relevance of threat enhances social anxiety-linked attentional bias to angry faces, but relevance of neutral information attenuates it.
现在你看到了,现在你又看不到了:威胁的相关性增强了与社交焦虑相关的对愤怒面孔的注意力偏向,但中性信息的相关性则减弱了这种偏向。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0271752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271752. eCollection 2022.
4
Don't look now! Emotion-induced blindness: The interplay between emotion and attention.别东张西望!情绪诱导的盲视:情绪与注意力的相互作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Nov;84(8):2741-2761. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02525-z. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
5
"Finding an Emotional Face" Revisited: Differences in Own-Age Bias and the Happiness Superiority Effect in Children and Young Adults.再探“识别情绪面孔”:儿童与青年成人在年龄偏好及快乐优势效应上的差异
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 29;12:580565. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.580565. eCollection 2021.
6
State anxiety reduces working memory capacity but does not impact filtering cost for neutral distracters.状态焦虑会降低工作记忆容量,但不会影响对中性分心物的过滤成本。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Oct;57(10):e13625. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13625. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
7
Visual Attention and Lexical Involvement in L1 and L2 Word Processing: Emotional Stroop Effect.视觉注意与母语和二语词汇加工中的词汇卷入:情绪斯特鲁普效应。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Jun;50(3):585-602. doi: 10.1007/s10936-020-09709-4.
8
The priority of goal-relevant information and evolutionarily threatening information in early attention processing:Evidence from behavioral and ERP study.早期注意加工中与目标相关的信息和进化威胁信息的优先级:来自行为和 ERP 研究的证据。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 14;10(1):8008. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65062-5.
9
The impact of affective information on working memory: A pair of meta-analytic reviews of behavioral and neuroimaging evidence.情感信息对工作记忆的影响:行为和神经影像学证据的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Jun;145(6):566-609. doi: 10.1037/bul0000193. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
10
Beyond Self-Report: A Review of Physiological and Neuroscientific Methods to Investigate Consumer Behavior.超越自我报告:对用于研究消费者行为的生理学和神经科学方法的综述
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 7;9:1655. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01655. eCollection 2018.