Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜与开腹结肠癌切除术治疗老年人群结肠癌:一项队列研究。

Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population: a cohort study.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Mailstop 5066, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-5066, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb 7;10:31. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer has been compared with open colectomy in randomized controlled trials, but these studies may not be generalizable because of strict enrollment and exclusion criteria which may explicitly or inadvertently exclude older individuals due to associated comorbidities. Previous studies of older patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy have generally focused on short-term outcomes. The goals of this cohort study were to identify predictors of laparoscopic colectomy in an older population in the United States and to compare short-term and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Patients aged 65 years or older with incident colorectal cancer diagnosed 1996-2002 who underwent colectomy within 6 months of cancer diagnosis were identified from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. Laparoscopic and open colectomy patients were compared with respect to length of stay, blood transfusion requirements, intensive care unit monitoring, complications, 30-day mortality, and long-term survival. We adjusted for potential selection bias in surgical approach with propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic colectomy cases were associated with left-sided tumors; areas with higher population density, income, and education level; areas in the western United States; and National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers. Laparoscopic colectomy cases had shorter length of stay and less intensive care unit monitoring. Although laparoscopic colectomy patients (n = 424) had fewer complications (21.5% versus 26.3%), lower 30-day mortality (3.3% versus 5.8%), and longer median survival (6.6 versus 4.8 years) compared with open colectomy patients (n = 27,012), after propensity score matching these differences disappeared.

CONCLUSIONS

In this older population, laparoscopic colectomy practice patterns were associated with factors which likely correlate with tertiary referral centers. Although short-term and long-term survival are comparable, laparoscopic colectomy offers shorter hospitalizations and less intensive care.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜结直肠切除术已在随机对照试验中与开腹结直肠切除术进行了比较,但由于严格的纳入和排除标准,这些研究可能不具有普遍性,这些标准可能会因相关合并症而明确或无意中排除老年人。以前对接受腹腔镜结直肠切除术的老年患者的研究通常侧重于短期结果。本队列研究的目的是确定美国老年人群中腹腔镜结直肠切除术的预测因素,并比较短期和长期结果。

方法

从监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险数据库中确定了 1996-2002 年诊断为结直肠癌且在癌症诊断后 6 个月内接受结直肠切除术的年龄在 65 岁或以上的患者。比较腹腔镜和开腹结直肠切除术患者的住院时间、输血需求、重症监护监测、并发症、30 天死亡率和长期生存情况。我们通过倾向评分匹配调整手术方法的潜在选择偏倚。

结果

腹腔镜结直肠切除术病例与左侧肿瘤相关;人口密度、收入和教育水平较高的地区;美国西部地区;以及美国国家癌症研究所指定的癌症中心。腹腔镜结直肠切除术患者的住院时间更短,重症监护监测更少。尽管腹腔镜结直肠切除术患者(n=424)的并发症(21.5%比 26.3%)、30 天死亡率(3.3%比 5.8%)和中位生存期(6.6 比 4.8 年)均低于开腹结直肠切除术患者(n=27012),但在进行倾向评分匹配后,这些差异消失。

结论

在这个老年人群中,腹腔镜结直肠切除术的实践模式与可能与三级转诊中心相关的因素相关。尽管短期和长期生存情况相当,但腹腔镜结直肠切除术可缩短住院时间和减少重症监护。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be32/3296595/76b4da36d54c/1477-7819-10-31-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验