Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup University Hospital, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark.
Br J Cancer. 2012 Feb 28;106(5):988-95. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.3. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
Not all patients have benefited equally from the advances in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survival. This study investigates several individual-level markers of socioeconomic position (SEP) in relation to NHL survival, and explores whether any social differences could be attributed to comorbidity, disease and prognostic factors, or the treatment given.
This registry-based cohort study links clinical data on prognostic factors and treatment from the national Danish lymphoma database to individual socioeconomic information in Statistics Denmark including 6234 patients diagnosed with NHL in 2000-2008.
All-cause mortality was 40% higher in NHL patients with short vs higher education diagnosed in the period 2000-2004 (hazard ratio (HR)=1.40 (1.27-1.54)), and 63% higher in the period 2005-2008 (HR=1.63 (1.40-1.90)). Further, mortality was increased in unemployed and disability pensioners, those with low income, and singles. Clinical prognostic factors attenuated, but did not eliminate the association between education and mortality. Radiotherapy was less frequently given to those with a short education (odds ratio (OR)= 0.84 (0.77-0.92)), low income (OR=0.80 (0.70-0.91)), and less frequent to singles (OR=0.79 (0.64-0.96)). Patients living alone were less likely to receive all treatment modalities.
Patients with low SEP have an elevated mortality rate after a NHL diagnosis, and more advanced disease at the time of diagnosis explained a part of this disparity. Thus, socioeconomic disparities in NHL survival might be reduced by improving early detection among patients of low SEP.
并非所有非霍奇金淋巴瘤 (NHL) 患者都能从生存获益中受益。本研究调查了几种与 NHL 生存相关的个体社会经济地位 (SEP) 标志物,并探讨了任何社会差异是否归因于合并症、疾病和预后因素,或所给予的治疗。
这项基于登记的队列研究将丹麦国家淋巴瘤数据库中的预后因素和治疗临床数据与丹麦统计局中的个体社会经济信息相链接,共纳入了 6234 例 2000-2008 年诊断为 NHL 的患者。
2000-2004 年期间,受教育程度较短的 NHL 患者的全因死亡率比受教育程度较高的患者高 40%(风险比 (HR)=1.40 (1.27-1.54)),而在 2005-2008 年期间,该死亡率高 63%(HR=1.63 (1.40-1.90))。此外,失业和领取残疾抚恤金者、低收入者和单身者的死亡率增加。临床预后因素减弱了,但并未消除教育与死亡率之间的关联。低教育程度(比值比 (OR)=0.84 (0.77-0.92))、低收入(OR=0.80 (0.70-0.91))和单身者(OR=0.79 (0.64-0.96))接受放疗的频率较低。独居患者接受所有治疗方式的可能性较低。
NHL 诊断后,社会经济地位较低的患者死亡率较高,而诊断时疾病更晚期解释了这种差异的一部分。因此,通过改善社会经济地位较低患者的早期检测,可能会减少 NHL 生存方面的社会经济差异。