Singh Charanpreet, Jandial Aditya, Jain Arihant, Lad Deepesh, Khadwal Alka, Basher Rajender, Bal Amanjit, Malhotra Pankaj, Prakash Gaurav
Department of Clinical Hematology and Medical Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2024 Apr;40(2):231-236. doi: 10.1007/s12288-023-01693-8. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
Standard therapy for patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (RR DLBCL) involves salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. However, information regarding the number of patients receiving salvage therapy and associated factors is not available from low/middle income countries (LMICs). All patients treated at our center with RR DLBCL from 2016 to 2021 were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses was performed to find factors associated with the lack of receipt of salvage chemotherapy. Eighty-five patients were included in the study. Most patients had primary refractory disease (69.4%). Only 26 patients received standard salvage therapy, while the others (N = 59) received metronomic/palliative oral therapy. On univariate analysis, patients with an annual income below India's Gross National Income per capita ( = 0.014), an education level below Class XII ( = 0.025), Stage III/IV disease at relapse ( = 0.018) and CNS relapse ( = 0.027) were more likely to receive palliative therapy. Conversely, patients with a late relapse were more likely to receive salvage therapy ( = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients with Stage III/IV relapse ( = 0.030) and an education level less than Class XII ( = 0.012) were more likely to receive palliative therapy, while patients with a late relapse ( = 0.001) were more likely to receive salvage therapy. Patients who received salvage therapy had a longer Median OS than those who received palliative therapy ( < 0.001). Timing of relapse, stage at relapse and educational status of the patient are significant factors affecting access to effective therapy for patients with RR DLBCL in LMICs.
复发/难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(RR DLBCL)患者的标准治疗包括挽救性化疗,随后进行自体造血干细胞移植。然而,低收入/中等收入国家(LMICs)尚无关于接受挽救性治疗的患者数量及相关因素的信息。本研究纳入了2016年至2021年在我们中心接受RR DLBCL治疗的所有患者。进行单因素和多因素分析以找出与未接受挽救性化疗相关的因素。85名患者纳入本研究。大多数患者患有原发性难治性疾病(69.4%)。仅26例患者接受了标准挽救性治疗,其余患者(N = 59)接受了节拍器/姑息性口服治疗。单因素分析显示,年收入低于印度人均国民总收入的患者(P = 0.014)、教育水平低于十二年级的患者(P = 0.025)、复发时处于III/IV期疾病的患者(P = 0.018)和中枢神经系统复发的患者(P = 0.027)更有可能接受姑息性治疗。相反,复发较晚的患者更有可能接受挽救性治疗(P = 0.001)。多因素分析显示,复发时处于III/IV期的患者(P = 0.030)和教育水平低于十二年级的患者(P = 0.012)更有可能接受姑息性治疗,而复发较晚的患者(P = 0.001)更有可能接受挽救性治疗。接受挽救性治疗的患者的中位总生存期长于接受姑息性治疗的患者(P < 0.001)。复发时间、复发时的分期以及患者的教育状况是影响LMICs中RR DLBCL患者获得有效治疗的重要因素。