Barros Helda Oliveira, Soares Marcelo Márcio
Programa de Pós-graduação em Design, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brasil.
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:4091-7. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0702-4091.
This study identified the factors existing in the methods and techniques used in the anthropometric analysis of wheelchair users which may adversely affect inter-population comparisons. Five studies of anthropometric analysis of wheelchair users were examined: Nowak (1996), Jarosz (1996), Das and Kozey (1999), Kozey and Das (2004) and Paquet and Feathers (2004). All the selected studies presented intra- and inter-population data. After having identified the methods and techniques cited, a comparison was made between the procedures used by these authors and those adopted by Barros (2007). The results indicate that inter-population comparison is valid only when there is similarity between the procedures and techniques used to collect data and the functional characteristics of the people evaluated.