• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜卵巢手术的学习曲线。

Learning curves for single-site laparoscopic ovarian surgery.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2012.01.003
PMID:22322155
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare learning curves for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for ovarian tumors according to the type of procedure (oophorectomy vs cystectomy).

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study. (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2).

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

One hundred fifteen patients who planned to undergo LESS for ovarian tumors by a surgeon between May 2008 and August 2010.

INTERVENTIONS

LESS.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The learning curve was assessed through the graph between the operative time and sequence of cases. Proficiency, defined as the point at which the slope of the learning curve became less steep, and surgical outcome were compared between the two surgery groups. LESS was successfully completed in 103 of 115 patients (94.8%). Learning curve for oophorectomies (n = 59) showed a continued slow slope with no apparent proficiency, suggesting oophorectomies did not pose an initial technical challenge. However, proficiency in cystectomies (n = 56) was evident at the thirty-third case. Furthermore, the oophorectomy group had a shorter operative time and less need for additional ports than the cystectomy group (69.4 minutes vs 100.1 minutes; 5.1% vs 14.3%).

CONCLUSION

Oophorectomy rather than cystectomy is recommended as the initial procedure to start with LESS for ovarian tumors.

摘要

研究目的

比较经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(LESS)治疗卵巢肿瘤的学习曲线,根据手术类型(卵巢切除术与囊肿切除术)进行比较。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。(加拿大工作队分类 II-2)。

设置

大学医院。

患者

2008 年 5 月至 2010 年 8 月间,由一名外科医生计划行 LESS 治疗卵巢肿瘤的 115 名患者。

干预措施

LESS。

测量和主要结果

通过手术时间与病例序列之间的图形来评估学习曲线。熟练程度定义为学习曲线斜率变得较不陡峭的点,并比较两组手术的手术结果。115 例患者中有 103 例(94.8%)成功完成 LESS。卵巢切除术(n = 59)的学习曲线显示持续缓慢的斜率,没有明显的熟练程度,表明卵巢切除术一开始并不具有技术挑战性。然而,囊肿切除术(n = 56)的熟练程度在第 33 例时就很明显。此外,卵巢切除术组的手术时间比囊肿切除术组短,需要额外的端口也更少(69.4 分钟比 100.1 分钟;5.1%比 14.3%)。

结论

与囊肿切除术相比,卵巢切除术更适合作为 LESS 治疗卵巢肿瘤的初始手术。

相似文献

1
Learning curves for single-site laparoscopic ovarian surgery.单孔腹腔镜卵巢手术的学习曲线。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
2
Single-port risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with and without hysterectomy: surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis.单孔腹腔镜下保留生育功能的输卵管卵巢切除术联合或不联合子宫切除术:手术结局和学习曲线分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Oct;119(1):43-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.05.026. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
3
Isobaric laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with wound retractor for adnexal tumors: a single center experience with the initial 100 cases.采用牵开器的等压腹腔镜单部位手术治疗附件肿瘤:单中心初步 100 例经验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Aug;157(2):190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.02.018. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
4
Learning curve and pitfalls of a laparoscopic score to describe peritoneal carcinosis in advanced ovarian cancer.腹腔镜评分描述晚期卵巢癌腹膜癌的学习曲线和陷阱。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Oct;90(10):1126-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01227.x. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
5
Treating adnexal masses. Operative laparoscopy vs. laparotomy.附件肿物的治疗。腹腔镜手术与开腹手术对比
J Reprod Med. 1997 Sep;42(9):551-8.
6
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.妇科肿瘤腹腔镜单孔手术(LESS):技术与初步报告。
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Aug;114(2):157-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.05.020. Epub 2009 May 28.
7
Surgical management of benign cystic teratoma. Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy.良性囊性畸胎瘤的外科治疗。腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的比较。
J Reprod Med. 1995 Jul;40(7):495-9.
8
Clinical outcome of cystectomy compared with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy as fertility-sparing treatment of borderline ovarian tumors.与单侧输卵管卵巢切除术相比,膀胱切除术作为保留生育功能治疗交界性卵巢肿瘤的临床结局。
Fertil Steril. 2007 Aug;88(2):479-84. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.128. Epub 2007 Apr 3.
9
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for adnexal tumors: one surgeon's initial experience over a one-year period.经脐单孔腹腔镜手术治疗附件肿瘤:一位外科医生在一年内的初步经验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Oct;158(2):265-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.04.020. Epub 2011 May 26.
10
What is the learning curve for single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy?单孔腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的学习曲线如何?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Sep;158(1):93-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.04.017. Epub 2011 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Can a Continuous Wound Infiltration System Replace Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management after a Single-Port Access Laparoscopy?连续伤口浸润系统能否替代静脉自控镇痛用于单孔腹腔镜术后疼痛管理?
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 25;13(19):5718. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195718.
2
Effect of two different laparoscopic techniques on post-operative wound complications in patients with benign gynaecological diseases: A meta-analysis.两种不同腹腔镜技术对妇科良性疾病患者术后伤口并发症的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct 13;21(2). doi: 10.1111/iwj.14382.
3
Does Robot Assisted Laparoscopy (RAL) Have an Advantage in Preservation of Ovarian Reserve in Endometriosis Surgery? Comparison of Single-Port Access (SPA) RAL and SPA Laparoscopy.
机器人辅助腹腔镜手术(RAL)在子宫内膜异位症手术中保留卵巢储备功能方面是否具有优势?单孔腹腔镜手术(SPA)RAL与SPA腹腔镜手术的比较。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 14;12(14):4673. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144673.
4
Efficacy of a continuous wound infiltration system for postoperative pain management in gynecologic patients who underwent single-port access laparoscopy for adnexal disease.连续伤口浸润系统用于因附件疾病接受单孔腹腔镜手术的妇科患者术后疼痛管理的疗效。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 5;10:1199428. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1199428. eCollection 2023.
5
Learning curve for laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy using the "chopstick" technique: a retrospective cohort study.使用“筷子”技术行腹腔镜单孔根治性子宫切除术的学习曲线:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Nov;10(21):1165. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4447.
6
Single-port laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy of benign adnexal masses during pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗妊娠期良性附件肿块的回顾性病例对照研究。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Oct;50(10):3000605221128153. doi: 10.1177/03000605221128153.
7
Hysterectomy and Adnexal Procedures by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (VNH): Initial Findings From a Korean Surgeon.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(VNH)行子宫切除术及附件手术:一位韩国外科医生的初步研究结果
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 22;7:583147. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.583147. eCollection 2020.
8
Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions.经脐单孔腹腔镜与两孔腹腔镜治疗附件病变的临床对比研究
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 18;11(1):4118. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82204-5.
9
Feasibility of Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopy for Large Ovarian Tumor Suspected to Be Borderline Ovarian Tumor.单孔腹腔镜手术用于疑似交界性卵巢肿瘤的大卵巢肿瘤的可行性
Front Oncol. 2020 Sep 16;10:583515. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.583515. eCollection 2020.
10
Comparison between Laparoendoscopic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Mature Cystic Teratoma of the Ovary.腹腔镜单孔手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗成熟性卵巢囊性畸胎瘤的比较
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2019 Oct 24;8(4):155-159. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_3_19. eCollection 2019 Oct-Dec.