Wilson R H, Zizz C A, Shanks J E, Causey G D
VA Medical Center, Long Beach, CA.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1990 Nov;55(4):771-8. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5504.771.
Two descriptive experiments were performed on a version of the Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 (NU No. 6) recorded by a female speaker that is included on an audio compact disc recently produced by the Department of Veterans Affairs. In Experiment 1, normative psychometric functions for the female speaker version of the NU No. 6 materials were established on 24 young adults for three monaural listening conditions (in quiet, in 60-dB SPL broadband noise, and in 60-dB SPL competing message). The 60-dB SPL broadband noise shifted the psychometric function for the NU No. 6 words 33 dB, whereas the 60-dB SPL competing message shifted the function only 18-22 dB. In contrast to the slopes of the quiet and noise conditions (4.5%/dB), the slope of the competing message function was more gradual (3.5%/dB). In Experiment 2, comparisons between the psychometric functions for the female and the original male speaker versions of NU No. 6 in quiet and in broadband noise were made on 8 young adults. In comparison to the psychometric functions for the male speaker version of NU No. 6, the functions for the female speaker version of NU No. 6 were displaced between the 10-90% correct points to higher sound-pressure levels by 10-13 dB in quiet and by 12-16 dB in noise. The difference in performance on the two versions of NU No. 6 is attributed to spectral differences between the two sets of materials that produced a calibration anomaly.
对美国退伍军人事务部最近制作的一张音频光盘上由女性朗读者录制的西北大学听觉测试第6版(NU No. 6)进行了两项描述性实验。在实验1中,针对24名年轻成年人,在三种单耳聆听条件下(安静环境、60分贝声压级宽带噪声环境以及60分贝声压级竞争语音环境),建立了女性朗读者版NU No. 6材料的标准心理测量函数。60分贝声压级宽带噪声使NU No. 6单词的心理测量函数偏移了33分贝,而60分贝声压级竞争语音仅使该函数偏移了18 - 22分贝。与安静和噪声条件下的斜率(4.5%/分贝)相比,竞争语音函数的斜率更平缓(3.5%/分贝)。在实验2中,对8名年轻成年人在安静和宽带噪声环境下女性朗读者版与原始男性朗读者版NU No. 6的心理测量函数进行了比较。与男性朗读者版NU No. 6的心理测量函数相比,女性朗读者版NU No. 6的函数在10 - 90%正确点之间,在安静环境中向更高声压级偏移了10 - 13分贝,在噪声环境中偏移了12 - 16分贝。NU No. 6两个版本在表现上的差异归因于两组材料之间的频谱差异,这种差异产生了校准异常。