• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无并存精神障碍的家族性和非家族性男性酒精性患者的比较。

A comparison of familial and nonfamilial male alcoholic patients without a coexisting psychiatric disorder.

作者信息

Penick E C, Nickel E J, Powell B J, Bingham S F, Liskow B I

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Kansas University Medical Center, Missouri.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol. 1990 Sep;51(5):443-7. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1990.51.443.

DOI:10.15288/jsa.1990.51.443
PMID:2232798
Abstract

Both family history of alcoholism and the presence of additional psychiatric disorder in male alcoholic patients are associated with an earlier onset of problem drinking, greater alcoholism severity and poorer clinical outcomes. To assess the relative contribution of family history alone, a sample of 212 male alcoholics not positive for any other psychiatric disorder was selected and divided into those with a family history of alcoholism (FH+) or no family history of alcoholism (FH-) among first degree relatives. Although FH+ alcoholics reported a younger age of onset of problem drinking and greater severity of some alcohol-related sequelae, the differences were not as extensive or pronounced as those found in a previous study of a sample of psychiatrically heterogeneous patients (Penick et al., 1987). A bi-dimensional typology of alcoholism incorporating both additional psychiatric diagnoses and a positive family history of alcoholism is suggested.

摘要

酗酒家族史以及男性酗酒患者中存在其他精神障碍均与饮酒问题的更早出现、更严重的酗酒程度和更差的临床结果相关。为了单独评估家族史的相对影响,选取了212名未患有任何其他精神障碍的男性酗酒者样本,并根据一级亲属中有无酗酒家族史分为有酗酒家族史(FH+)或无酗酒家族史(FH-)两组。尽管FH+组酗酒者报告的饮酒问题起病年龄更小,且一些与酒精相关后遗症的严重程度更高,但这些差异不如先前对精神状态各异的患者样本研究(Penick等人,1987年)中发现的那么广泛或显著。有人提出了一种二维酗酒类型学,该类型学纳入了其他精神疾病诊断以及酗酒家族史阳性情况。

相似文献

1
A comparison of familial and nonfamilial male alcoholic patients without a coexisting psychiatric disorder.无并存精神障碍的家族性和非家族性男性酒精性患者的比较。
J Stud Alcohol. 1990 Sep;51(5):443-7. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1990.51.443.
2
Subtyping male alcoholics by family history of alcohol abuse and co-occurring psychiatric disorder: a bi-dimensional model.
Br J Addict. 1990 Mar;85(3):367-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1990.tb00653.x.
3
A comparative study of familial alcoholism.
J Stud Alcohol. 1987 Mar;48(2):136-46. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1987.48.136.
4
Studies of familial alcoholism: a review.家族性酒精中毒研究综述
J Clin Psychiatry. 1984 Dec;45(12 Pt 2):14-7.
5
A controlled family history study of prepubertal major depressive disorder.一项关于青春期前重度抑郁症的对照家族史研究。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 May;46(5):406-18. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810050020005.
6
Prevalence of additional psychiatric syndromes among male alcoholics.男性酗酒者中其他精神综合征的患病率。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1982 Oct;43(10):404-7.
7
Behavioral symptoms and psychiatric diagnoses among 162 children in nonalcoholic or alcoholic families.非酒精性或酒精性家庭中162名儿童的行为症状和精神疾病诊断
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;157(11):1881-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1881.
8
A family study of alcohol dependence: coaggregation of multiple disorders in relatives of alcohol-dependent probands.酒精依赖的家族研究:酒精依赖先证者亲属中多种疾病的共同聚集。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;61(12):1246-56. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.12.1246.
9
Neuropsychological differences between male familial and nonfamilial alcoholics and nonalcoholics.男性家族性和非家族性酗酒者与非酗酒者之间的神经心理学差异。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1984 Jul-Aug;8(4):347-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1984.tb05678.x.
10
Patterns of familial alcoholism, alcoholism severity, and psychopathology.家族性酒精中毒模式、酒精中毒严重程度及精神病理学
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988 Mar;176(3):167-75. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198803000-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
Family history of substance use disorders: Significance for mental health in young adults who gamble.物质使用障碍家族史:对赌博的年轻成年人心理健康的意义。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Jun 5;9(2):289-297. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00017. Print 2020 Jun.