• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

179 例主动脉瓣环成形术(David 手术)的结果:单中心经验。

The outcome after aortic valve-sparing (David) operation in 179 patients: a single-centre experience.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Aug;42(2):261-6; discussion 266-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs011. Epub 2012 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezs011
PMID:22328626
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The David aortic valve-sparing reimplantation (AVr-D) operation is increasingly being used in patients with aortic root aneurysmal disease and pliable aortic cusps. The objective of this study was to assess our early and medium-term outcomes with the AVr-D operation.

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2011, a total of 179 patients underwent AVr-D procedures. The mean patient age was 49.7 ± 15.1 years, and 23.5% (n = 42) were females. Marfan syndrome was present in 17.3% of patients (n = 31), and acute Type A aortic dissection in 15.6% (n = 28). Clinical follow-up was 100% complete and was 1.8 ± 1.6 years (0 days to 7.5 years) long. Echocardiographic follow-up was performed 2.2 ± 1.5 years (0 days to 7.5 years) postoperatively and was 77% complete.

RESULTS

Early mortality was 1.1% (n = 2), with both deaths occurring in patients with Type A dissection. Pre-discharge echocardiography revealed no patients with >2+ aortic insufficiency (AI), 19.6% of patients (n = 34) with 1+ or 2+ AI and 80.4% of patients (n = 145) with trace or no AI. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameters decreased significantly from 5.6 ± 0.9 to 5.1 ± 0.8 cm early postoperatively (P < 0.01). Transvalvular maximum gradients were similar before discharge and at last follow-up (10.6 ± 5.4 vs. 10.0 ± 8.2 mmHg, P = 0.4). AI grade increased significantly over time (0.3 ± 0.4 before discharge vs. 0.5 ± 0.6 at follow-up, P = 0.01), but remained less than moderate in 93.6% of patients. Four patients required aortic valve re-replacement during follow-up, two due to early endocarditis and two due to non-coronary leaflet prolapse in Marfan patients. Five-year freedom from aortic valve reoperation was 95.9 ± 2.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

AVr-D is associated with a low mortality and morbidity rate, even in patients with Type A aortic dissection. Although a slightly higher rate of recurrent AI may be present in patients with Marfan syndrome, freedom from recurrent AI and reoperation remains excellent during medium-term follow-up. The David operation should be considered the gold standard for patients with proximal aortic root pathology (aneurysm or dissection) and pliable aortic cusps.

摘要

目的

越来越多的患者因主动脉根部瘤样病变和柔软主动脉瓣而接受 David 主动脉瓣保留再植入术(AVr-D)。本研究旨在评估我们的 AVr-D 手术的早期和中期结果。

方法

2003 年至 2011 年间,共 179 例患者接受 AVr-D 手术。患者平均年龄为 49.7 ± 15.1 岁,23.5%(n=42)为女性。17.3%的患者(n=31)患有马凡综合征,15.6%(n=28)患有急性 A 型主动脉夹层。临床随访完成率为 100%,随访时间为 1.8 ± 1.6 年(0 天至 7.5 年)。术后 2.2 ± 1.5 年(0 天至 7.5 年)进行超声心动图随访,随访完成率为 77%。

结果

早期死亡率为 1.1%(n=2),均发生在 A 型夹层患者中。出院前超声心动图检查未见>2+主动脉瓣关闭不全(AI),19.6%(n=34)患者为 1+或 2+AI,80.4%(n=145)患者为微量或无 AI。左心室舒张末期直径在术后早期显著减小,从 5.6±0.9cm 降至 5.1±0.8cm(P<0.01)。出院时和最后一次随访时跨瓣最大梯度相似(10.6±5.4 vs. 10.0±8.2mmHg,P=0.4)。AI 分级随时间显著增加(出院前为 0.3±0.4,随访时为 0.5±0.6,P=0.01),但在 93.6%的患者中仍小于中度。4 例患者在随访期间需要再次主动脉瓣置换,2 例因早期心内膜炎,2 例因马凡综合征患者非冠状动脉瓣叶脱垂。5 年无主动脉瓣再手术率为 95.9±2.0%。

结论

即使在 A 型主动脉夹层患者中,AVr-D 手术也与较低的死亡率和发病率相关。尽管马凡综合征患者中可能存在更高的复发性 AI 发生率,但在中期随访中,无复发性 AI 和再次手术的成功率仍然很高。David 手术应被视为近端主动脉根部病变(动脉瘤或夹层)和柔软主动脉瓣患者的金标准。

相似文献

1
The outcome after aortic valve-sparing (David) operation in 179 patients: a single-centre experience.179 例主动脉瓣环成形术(David 手术)的结果:单中心经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Aug;42(2):261-6; discussion 266-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs011. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
2
David I reimplantation procedure for aortic root replacement in Marfan patients: medium-term outcome.大卫I型法用于马凡综合征患者主动脉根部置换的再植入手术:中期结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Nov;19(5):743-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu244. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
3
Early results of valve-sparing aortic root replacement in high-risk clinical scenarios.高危临床情况下保留瓣膜的主动脉根部替换术的早期结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;89(2):471-6; discussion 477-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.10.030.
4
Clinical outcomes of combined aortic root reimplantation technique and total arch replacement.主动脉根部再植入技术与全弓置换联合手术的临床疗效
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jul;48(1):152-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu387. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
5
Long-term results after aortic valve-sparing operation (David I).保留主动脉瓣的主动脉瓣置换手术的长期结果(David I)。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jan;41(1):56-61; discussion 61-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.04.012.
6
Reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement with the Valsalva graft: what have we learnt after 100 cases?采用窦管 graft 进行保留瓣膜的主动脉根部再植入置换术:100 例术后我们学到了什么?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;9(1):113-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.202622. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
7
Valve-sparing David I procedure in acute aortic type A dissection: a 20-year experience with more than 100 patients.急性主动脉 A 型夹层行保留瓣膜的 David I 手术:超过 100 例患者的 20 年经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Aug 1;52(2):319-324. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx170.
8
Midterm results of David V valve-sparing aortic root replacement in acute type A aortic dissection.David V保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术治疗急性A型主动脉夹层的中期结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Mar;99(3):795-800; discussion 800-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.08.079. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
9
Long-term outcomes of aortic root operations for Marfan syndrome: A comparison of Bentall versus aortic valve-sparing procedures.马凡综合征主动脉根部手术的长期结果:Bentall手术与保留主动脉瓣手术的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Feb;151(2):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.068. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
10
Aortic valve-sparing operation in Marfan syndrome: what do we know after a decade?马凡综合征的保留主动脉瓣手术:十年后我们了解了什么?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Feb;83(2):S764-8; discussion S785-90. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.097.

引用本文的文献

1
Short and mid-term outcomes of valve-sparing, aortic root reimplantation (David's procedure).保留瓣膜的主动脉根部再植术(David 手术)的短期和中期结果。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jan 31;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02546-9.
2
Early and Late-Term Follow-Up Results of Patients Diagnosed with Aortic Aneurysm or Aortic Dissection with Aortic Regurgitation Undergoing Aortic Valve Repair or Valve-Sparing Aortic Surgery.诊断为主动脉瘤或主动脉夹层合并主动脉反流的患者接受主动脉瓣修复或保留瓣膜主动脉手术的早期和晚期随访结果
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Apr 1;36(2):192-200. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0133.
3
David aortic valve-sparing reimplantation versus biological aortic root replacement: a retrospective analysis of 411 patients.
大卫保留主动脉瓣再植入术与生物主动脉根部置换术:411例患者的回顾性分析。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jan;36(Suppl 1):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s12055-019-00873-4. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
4
The Florida Sleeve Procedure Is Durable and Improves Aortic Valve Function.佛罗里达袖状手术效果持久,可改善主动脉瓣功能。
Aorta (Stamford). 2019 Apr;7(2):49-55. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1687854. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
5
Toward standardization of valve-sparing root replacement and annuloplasty.迈向保留瓣膜的根部置换和瓣环成形术的标准化。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;66(12):685-691. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-1015-x. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
6
Valve-sparing aortic root surgery. CON: remodeling.保留瓣膜的主动脉根部手术。反对意见:重塑。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;67(1):82-92. doi: 10.1007/s11748-017-0833-6. Epub 2017 Sep 16.
7
Comparison of outcomes of root replacement procedures and supracoronary techniques for surgical repair of acute aortic dissection.急性主动脉夹层手术修复中根部置换术与冠状动脉上技术的疗效比较。
Can J Surg. 2017 Jun;60(3):198-204. doi: 10.1503/cjs.009116.
8
Old Myths, New Concerns: the Long-Term Effects of Ascending Aorta Replacement with Dacron Grafts. Not All That Glitters Is Gold.旧有误区,新的担忧:用涤纶人工血管置换升主动脉的长期影响。并非所有闪光的都是金子。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2016 Aug;9(4):334-42. doi: 10.1007/s12265-016-9699-8. Epub 2016 May 31.
9
[Aneurysms of the ascending aorta and aortic arch].升主动脉和主动脉弓动脉瘤
Chirurg. 2014 Sep;85(9):758, 760-66. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2716-z.
10
Aortic valve reimplantation for aortic root aneurysms: trainer and trainee differences on long-term results.主动脉根部动脉瘤的主动脉瓣再植入术:培训者与受训者在长期结果上的差异
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Feb;400(2):259-66. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1222-6. Epub 2014 Jul 15.