• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long-term results after aortic valve-sparing operation (David I).保留主动脉瓣的主动脉瓣置换手术的长期结果(David I)。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jan;41(1):56-61; discussion 61-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.04.012.
2
The outcome after aortic valve-sparing (David) operation in 179 patients: a single-centre experience.179 例主动脉瓣环成形术(David 手术)的结果:单中心经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Aug;42(2):261-6; discussion 266-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs011. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
3
Comparison of aortic root replacement in patients with Marfan syndrome.马凡综合征患者主动脉根部置换的比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Nov;40(5):1052-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.018. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
4
Early results of valve-sparing aortic root replacement in high-risk clinical scenarios.高危临床情况下保留瓣膜的主动脉根部替换术的早期结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;89(2):471-6; discussion 477-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.10.030.
5
Valve-sparing David I procedure in acute aortic type A dissection: a 20-year experience with more than 100 patients.急性主动脉 A 型夹层行保留瓣膜的 David I 手术:超过 100 例患者的 20 年经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Aug 1;52(2):319-324. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx170.
6
Long-term outcome after the original and simple modified technique of valve-sparing aortic root reimplantation in Marfan-based population, David V University of Tokyo modification.基于马凡综合征人群的主动脉根部保留瓣膜再植入原始及简化改良技术(东京大学大卫V改良法)后的长期预后
J Cardiol. 2016 Jan;67(1):86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
7
David I reimplantation procedure for aortic root replacement in Marfan patients: medium-term outcome.大卫I型法用于马凡综合征患者主动脉根部置换的再植入手术:中期结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Nov;19(5):743-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu244. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
8
Long-term outcomes of aortic root operations for Marfan syndrome: A comparison of Bentall versus aortic valve-sparing procedures.马凡综合征主动脉根部手术的长期结果:Bentall手术与保留主动脉瓣手术的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Feb;151(2):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.068. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
9
[Surgical treatment of cardiovascular manifestations of Marfan syndrome].马凡综合征心血管表现的外科治疗
Kyobu Geka. 2002 Jul;55(8 Suppl):658-62.
10
Results of aortic valve-sparing operations: experience with remodeling and reimplantation procedures in 65 patients.保留主动脉瓣手术的结果:65例患者行重塑和再植入手术的经验
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Sep;78(3):767-72; discussion 767-72. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.03.040.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment options for isolated aortic valve insufficiency: a review.单纯主动脉瓣关闭不全的治疗选择:综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 11;11:1381102. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1381102. eCollection 2024.
2
Short and mid-term outcomes of valve-sparing, aortic root reimplantation (David's procedure).保留瓣膜的主动脉根部再植术(David 手术)的短期和中期结果。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jan 31;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02546-9.
3
Valve-sparing David procedure minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome.保留瓣膜的David手术微创入路不影响手术效果。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 14;9:966126. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.966126. eCollection 2022.
4
Hemi-root replacement with diagonal resection of the aortic root preserving the ostium of the left coronary artery and sacrificing the right coronary artery for an infected pseudoaneurysm: a case report.采用保留左冠状动脉开口并牺牲右冠状动脉的主动脉根部斜行切除进行半根部置换治疗感染性假性动脉瘤:1例报告
J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Apr 4;2022(4):rjac129. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjac129. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Is aortic valve-sparing root reimplantation (David-I) justified in cardiac redo surgery?在心脏再次手术中,主动脉瓣环保留的根部再植入术(David-I)是否合理?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jun 15;35(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac058.
6
The Ross procedure and valve-sparing root replacement procedures in the adult patient: do guidelines follow the evidence?成人患者的罗斯手术及保留瓣膜的根部置换手术:指南是否遵循了证据?
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jul;10(4):433-443. doi: 10.21037/acs-2021-rp-24.
7
Early and Late-Term Follow-Up Results of Patients Diagnosed with Aortic Aneurysm or Aortic Dissection with Aortic Regurgitation Undergoing Aortic Valve Repair or Valve-Sparing Aortic Surgery.诊断为主动脉瘤或主动脉夹层合并主动脉反流的患者接受主动脉瓣修复或保留瓣膜主动脉手术的早期和晚期随访结果
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Apr 1;36(2):192-200. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0133.
8
Aortic root surgery in Marfan syndrome.马凡综合征的主动脉根部手术。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jun;35(Suppl 2):79-86. doi: 10.1007/s12055-018-0761-9. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
9
Post-operative myocardial infarction following aortic root surgery with coronary reimplantation: a case series treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.主动脉根部手术联合冠状动脉再植入术后心肌梗死:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的病例系列
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2019 Oct 22;3(4):1-6. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytz181. eCollection 2019 Dec.
10
The Florida Sleeve Procedure Is Durable and Improves Aortic Valve Function.佛罗里达袖状手术效果持久,可改善主动脉瓣功能。
Aorta (Stamford). 2019 Apr;7(2):49-55. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1687854. Epub 2019 Sep 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Ascending aortic cannulation in acute aortic dissection type A: the Hannover experience.急性A型主动脉夹层的升主动脉插管:汉诺威经验
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Oct;34(4):792-6; disussion 796. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.05.014. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
2
Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions.心脏瓣膜介入术后死亡率和发病率报告指南。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Apr;33(4):523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.055. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
3
Is treatment of acute type A aortic dissection in septuagenarians justifiable?对七十多岁的急性A型主动脉夹层患者进行治疗是否合理?
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2008 Jan;16(1):33-6. doi: 10.1177/021849230801600109.
4
Aortic root reconstruction with a bioprosthetic valved conduit: a consecutive series of 275 procedures.使用生物人工带瓣管道进行主动脉根部重建:连续275例手术系列研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Jun;133(6):1455-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.058. Epub 2007 May 2.
5
Aortic valve-sparing operation in Marfan syndrome: what do we know after a decade?马凡综合征的保留主动脉瓣手术:十年后我们了解了什么?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Feb;83(2):S764-8; discussion S785-90. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.097.
6
Decade of aortic valve sparing reimplantation: are we pushing the limits too far?主动脉瓣保留再植入十年:我们是否将极限推得太远了?
Circulation. 2005 Aug 30;112(9 Suppl):I253-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIRCULATIONAHA.104.525907.
7
Aortic root surgery in Marfan syndrome: Comparison of aortic valve-sparing reimplantation versus composite grafting.马凡综合征的主动脉根部手术:保留主动脉瓣再植入术与复合移植术的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Feb;127(2):391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.07.049.
8
Impact of preoperative aortic root diameter on long-term aortic valve function after valve sparing aortic root reimplantation.术前主动脉根部直径对保留瓣膜主动脉根部再植术后长期主动脉瓣功能的影响。
Circulation. 2003 Sep 9;108 Suppl 1:II285-90. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000087429.48264.81.
9
Results of surgery for aortic root aneurysm in patients with Marfan syndrome.马凡综合征患者主动脉根部瘤的手术结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Apr;125(4):789-96. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2003.57.
10
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with the Marfan syndrome.马方综合征患者的保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Apr;125(4):773-8. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2003.162.

保留主动脉瓣的主动脉瓣置换手术的长期结果(David I)。

Long-term results after aortic valve-sparing operation (David I).

机构信息

Department of Cardio-thoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jan;41(1):56-61; discussion 61-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.04.012.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.04.012
PMID:21632258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3241084/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aortic valve-sparing David procedure has gained broad acceptance. However, few long-term results have been published. We present our results.

METHODS

More than 450 David procedures have been performed in our institution so far. Of these, 126 patients were operated between July 1993 and December 2000. Median age was 57 (8-83) years and 46 (36.5%) were female. As many as 26 (20.6%) had Marfan syndrome, 21 (16.7%) had acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) and 67 (53.2%) had additional procedures.

RESULTS

There were six (4.8%) deaths in 30 post-operative period (POD), four of whom had AADA. In the follow-up, there were 32 (25.4%) late deaths, 11 (34.4%) of these were caused by cardiac or underlying disease or op-related. As many as 15 (11.9%) patients were re-operated; six (40%) were Marfan patients and two (13.3%) had early endocarditis. Follow-up echocardiography of 76 (60.3%) event-free patients showed valve insufficiency (AI)≤AI I° in 68 (89.5%) and grade II in 7 (9.2%) patients. Leaflet degeneration due to proposed leaflet contact with the straight Dacron graft was not observed. A total of 36 (47.4%) patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I, 33 (43.4%) in NYHA II, and five (6.6%) were in class III. During the entire follow-up of 790 patient-years, there was no stroke or major bleeding. Survival at 1, 5 and 10 years was 93%, 85% and 70%, respectively. Freedom from valve replacement at 1, 5 and 10 years was 96%, 91% and 87%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the underlying pathology, valve-sparing David I procedure has acceptable long-term results. Valve-related complications such as stroke or major bleeding is exceedingly low.

摘要

目的

保留主动脉瓣的 David 手术已经得到广泛认可。然而,目前仅有少数长期结果公布。我们报告我们的结果。

方法

到目前为止,我院已进行了超过 450 例 David 手术。其中,1993 年 7 月至 2000 年 12 月期间手术的患者有 126 例。中位年龄为 57(8-83)岁,46 例(36.5%)为女性。26 例(20.6%)患有马凡综合征,21 例(16.7%)患有急性 A 型主动脉夹层(AADA),67 例(53.2%)接受了其他手术。

结果

术后 30 天内有 6 例(4.8%)死亡,其中 4 例患有 AADA。在随访中,有 32 例(25.4%)晚期死亡,其中 11 例(34.4%)由心脏或基础疾病或 op 相关引起。15 例(11.9%)患者再次手术,其中 6 例(40%)为马凡患者,2 例(13.3%)患有早期心内膜炎。对 76 例(60.3%)无事件患者的超声心动图随访显示,瓣膜功能不全(AI)≤AI I°的有 68 例(89.5%),AI II°的有 7 例(9.2%)。未观察到因建议的瓣叶与直型 Dacron 移植物接触而导致瓣叶退化。共有 36 例(47.4%)患者为纽约心脏病协会(NYHA)心功能Ⅰ级,33 例(43.4%)为 NYHA Ⅱ级,5 例(6.6%)为 NYHA Ⅲ级。在整个 790 患者年的随访中,无卒中或大出血发生。术后 1、5、10 年生存率分别为 93%、85%和 70%。术后 1、5、10 年无瓣膜置换生存率分别为 96%、91%和 87%。

结论

无论基础病理如何,保留主动脉瓣的 David I 手术都具有可接受的长期结果。瓣膜相关并发症,如卒中或大出血,发生率极低。