Suppr超能文献

安非他命治疗 ADHD 的药理学和临床结局:成分重要吗?

The pharmacology and clinical outcomes of amphetamines to treat ADHD: does composition matter?

机构信息

Shire Pharmaceuticals, Wayne, PA, USA.

出版信息

CNS Drugs. 2012 Mar 1;26(3):245-68. doi: 10.2165/11599630-000000000-00000.

Abstract

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment options include pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches. In North America, psychostimulants (amphetamine and methylphenidate) are considered first-line pharmacological treatments for patients (children, adolescents and adults) with ADHD. However, in the UK, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines have placed short-acting d-amphetamine as a third-line treatment option due to a lack of contemporary, published clinical trials on its efficacy and the concerns from clinical and patient experts regarding the potential for increased abuse and/or misuse compared with methylphenidate. These guidelines do not account for some of the more recent amphetamine products that have been developed to alleviate some of these concerns, but that are not currently approved in the UK or other European countries. The purpose of this review is to describe the pharmacology and clinical efficacy of various amphetamine compositions, as well as to explore the apparent differences in these compositions and their associated risks and benefits. A PubMed literature search was conducted to investigate amphetamine pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety and ADHD outcomes in the published literature from 1980 through March 2011. Search terms included the keywords 'ADHD' or 'ADD' or 'hyperkinetic disorder' and any of the following keywords combined with 'or': 'amphetamine', 'dexamphetamine', 'mixed amphetamine salts', 'lisdexamfetamine' and 'methamphetamine'. The search included English-language primary research articles and review articles but excluded editorial articles and commentaries. The literature search resulted in 330 articles. Pertinent articles relating to amphetamine pharmacology, compositions, clinical efficacy and safety, effectiveness and tolerability, ADHD outcomes and abuse liability were included in this review. The different delivery profiles of amphetamine compositions result in pharmacological and pharmacokinetic differences that contribute to varying effects in the clinical treatment of ADHD, ADHD outcomes and abuse liability. The efficacy and safety of amphetamine compositions for the treatment of ADHD have been demonstrated in clinical trials and meta-analyses, and the long-acting amphetamine compositions have been widely studied and found efficacious without increased adverse effects. Long-acting amphetamine compositions offer the obvious advantage of enhanced duration of action over short-acting amphetamine compositions, and lisdexamfetamine has been shown to have reduced abuse liability compared with short-acting amphetamine.

摘要

注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的治疗选择包括药理学和非药理学方法。在北美,兴奋剂(安非他命和哌醋甲酯)被认为是 ADHD 患者(儿童、青少年和成人)的一线药理学治疗方法。然而,在英国,国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南将短效 d-安非他命作为三线治疗选择,因为缺乏关于其疗效的当代已发表临床试验,并且临床和患者专家对与哌醋甲酯相比,滥用和/或误用的潜在风险表示担忧。这些指南没有考虑到一些最近开发的安非他命产品,这些产品旨在缓解其中的一些担忧,但在英国或其他欧洲国家尚未获得批准。本综述的目的是描述各种安非他命制剂的药理学和临床疗效,并探讨这些制剂之间的明显差异及其相关风险和益处。对 1980 年至 2011 年 3 月发表文献中的安非他命药理学、临床疗效和安全性以及 ADHD 结局进行了 PubMed 文献检索。搜索词包括关键字“ADHD”或“ADD”或“多动障碍”和以下任何一个关键字与“或”组合:“安非他命”、“右旋苯丙胺”、“混合安非他命盐”、“利右苯丙胺”和“甲基苯丙胺”。搜索包括英语原始研究文章和综述文章,但不包括社论文章和评论。文献检索得到 330 篇文章。将与安非他命药理学、组成、临床疗效和安全性、有效性和耐受性、ADHD 结局和滥用倾向相关的相关文章纳入本综述。安非他命制剂的不同给药方式导致药理学和药代动力学的差异,从而导致 ADHD 的临床治疗、ADHD 结局和滥用倾向的效果不同。安非他命制剂治疗 ADHD 的疗效和安全性已在临床试验和荟萃分析中得到证实,长效安非他命制剂已得到广泛研究并发现有效,而没有增加不良反应。长效安非他命制剂具有比短效安非他命制剂更长的作用持续时间,明显的优势,并且与短效安非他命相比,利右苯丙胺显示出较低的滥用倾向。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验