Suppr超能文献

使用荟萃分析比较青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍药物的疗效。

Using Meta-analysis to Compare the Efficacy of Medications for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Youths.

作者信息

Faraone Stephen V

出版信息

P T. 2009 Dec;34(12):678-94.

Abstract

Medications used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been well researched, but comparisons among agents are hindered by the absence of head-to-head clinical trials. By using meta-analysis, we sought to compare the efficacy of these medications for the symptoms of ADHD. We analyzed published literature on the pharmacotherapy of ADHD to describe the variability of drug-placebo effect sizes and conducted a literature search to identify double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of youths with ADHD that were published after 1979. Meta-analysis regression was used to assess the influence of the medication type on drug effects. We also assessed for publication bias.Thirty-two trials met our criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. These trials involved 16 drugs using 20 different outcome measures of ADHD behaviors. The effect sizes for immediate-release stimulants and long-acting stimulants were similar and were greater than the effect sizes for non-stimulants. There was no evidence of publication bias.Although nearly all of the ADHD medications had significant effects, we found substantial variability. When translated into the costs of treating large numbers of patients, these effect sizes have implications for formulary medication choices.

摘要

用于治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的药物已得到充分研究,但由于缺乏直接对比的临床试验,不同药物之间的比较受到阻碍。通过荟萃分析,我们试图比较这些药物对ADHD症状的疗效。我们分析了已发表的关于ADHD药物治疗的文献,以描述药物与安慰剂效应大小的差异,并进行文献检索,以确定1979年后发表的针对ADHD青少年的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。使用荟萃分析回归来评估药物类型对药物效果的影响。我们还评估了发表偏倚。32项试验符合我们的标准并纳入本荟萃分析。这些试验涉及16种药物,使用了20种不同的ADHD行为结局指标。速释兴奋剂和长效兴奋剂的效应大小相似,且大于非兴奋剂的效应大小。没有发表偏倚的证据。尽管几乎所有治疗ADHD的药物都有显著效果,但我们发现存在很大差异。当转化为治疗大量患者的成本时,这些效应大小对处方药物的选择有影响。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验