• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义记忆中的最佳觅食。

Optimal foraging in semantic memory.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, England.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 2012 Apr;119(2):431-40. doi: 10.1037/a0027373. Epub 2012 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1037/a0027373
PMID:22329683
Abstract

Do humans search in memory using dynamic local-to-global search strategies similar to those that animals use to forage between patches in space? If so, do their dynamic memory search policies correspond to optimal foraging strategies seen for spatial foraging? Results from a number of fields suggest these possibilities, including the shared structure of the search problems-searching in patchy environments-and recent evidence supporting a domain-general cognitive search process. To investigate these questions directly, we asked participants to recover from memory as many animal names as they could in 3 min. Memory search was modeled over a representation of the semantic search space generated from the BEAGLE memory model of Jones and Mewhort (2007), via a search process similar to models of associative memory search (e.g., Raaijmakers & Shiffrin, 1981). We found evidence for local structure (i.e., patches) in memory search and patch depletion preceding dynamic local-to-global transitions between patches. Dynamic models also significantly outperformed nondynamic models. The timing of dynamic local-to-global transitions was consistent with optimal search policies in space, specifically the marginal value theorem (Charnov, 1976), and participants who were more consistent with this policy recalled more items.

摘要

人类是否在记忆中使用类似于动物在空间中在斑块之间觅食的动态局部到全局搜索策略来搜索?如果是这样,他们的动态记忆搜索策略是否与空间觅食中看到的最佳觅食策略相对应?许多领域的研究结果表明了这些可能性,包括搜索问题——在斑块环境中搜索——的共享结构,以及支持通用认知搜索过程的最新证据。为了直接研究这些问题,我们要求参与者在 3 分钟内尽可能多地从记忆中恢复动物的名字。通过与联想记忆搜索模型(例如 Raaijmakers & Shiffrin,1981)相似的搜索过程,对 Jones 和 Mewhort(2007)的 BEAGLE 记忆模型生成的语义搜索空间的表示进行了记忆搜索建模。我们发现记忆搜索中存在局部结构(即斑块)的证据,并且在斑块之间的动态局部到全局转变之前存在斑块耗竭。动态模型也明显优于非动态模型。动态局部到全局转变的时间与空间中的最优搜索策略一致,特别是边际价值定理(Charnov,1976),并且更符合该策略的参与者回忆的项目更多。

相似文献

1
Optimal foraging in semantic memory.语义记忆中的最佳觅食。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Apr;119(2):431-40. doi: 10.1037/a0027373. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
2
Foraging in Semantic Fields: How We Search Through Memory.语义场中的搜索:我们如何在记忆中进行检索。
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Jul;7(3):513-34. doi: 10.1111/tops.12151. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
3
Random walks on semantic networks can resemble optimal foraging.语义网络上的随机游走类似于最佳觅食。
Psychol Rev. 2015 Jul;122(3):558-69. doi: 10.1037/a0038693. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
4
The Role of Semantic Clustering in Optimal Memory Foraging.语义聚类在最优记忆觅食中的作用。
Cogn Sci. 2015 Nov;39(8):1925-39. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12249. Epub 2015 May 9.
5
Hidden processes in structural representations: A reply to Abbott, Austerweil, and Griffiths (2015).结构表征中的隐藏过程:对阿博特、奥斯特韦尔和格里菲思(2015年)的回应
Psychol Rev. 2015 Jul;122(3):570-4. doi: 10.1037/a0039248.
6
Dynamic search and working memory in social recall.社会回忆中的动态搜索和工作记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jan;38(1):218-28. doi: 10.1037/a0025161. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
7
Semantic Search in the Remote Associates Test.远距离联想测验中的语义搜索
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Jul;7(3):494-512. doi: 10.1111/tops.12146. Epub 2015 May 15.
8
The breadth of memory search.记忆搜索的广度
Memory. 2002 Jul;10(4):291-301. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000407.
9
Strategic search from long-term memory: an examination of semantic and autobiographical recall.从长时记忆中进行策略性搜索:语义和自传体回忆的考察。
Memory. 2014;22(6):687-99. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.812736. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
10
Search in external and internal spaces: evidence for generalized cognitive search processes.在外部和内部空间中进行搜索:广义认知搜索过程的证据
Psychol Sci. 2008 Aug;19(8):802-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02160.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A cognitive multiplex network approach to investigate mental navigation and predict high-level cognition.一种用于研究心理导航和预测高级认知的认知多重网络方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Aug 25;57(10):268. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02748-6.
2
Measuring individual semantic networks: A simulation study.测量个体语义网络:一项模拟研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 11;20(8):e0328712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328712. eCollection 2025.
3
Subjective valuation as a domain-general process in creative thinking.主观评价作为创造性思维中的一种通用领域过程。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 17;3(1):108. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00285-8.
4
Quantifying the roles of visual, linguistic, and visual-linguistic complexity in noun and verb acquisition.量化视觉、语言以及视觉-语言复杂性在名词和动词习得中的作用。
PLoS One. 2025 May 23;20(5):e0321973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321973. eCollection 2025.
5
Adaptive mechanisms of social and asocial learning in immersive collective foraging.沉浸式集体觅食中社会学习与非社会学习的适应性机制。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 25;16(1):3539. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58365-6.
6
Semantic memory disorganization linked to social functioning in patients with schizophrenia.语义记忆紊乱与精神分裂症患者的社会功能相关。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Apr 15;11(1):61. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00615-z.
7
Neural dynamics of semantic control underlying generative storytelling.生成性叙事背后语义控制的神经动力学
Commun Biol. 2025 Mar 28;8(1):513. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07913-3.
8
Adaptive Decision-Making "Fast" and "Slow": A Model of Creative Thinking.适应性决策的“快”与“慢”:一种创造性思维模型。
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Mar;61(5):e70024. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70024.
9
Noise in Cognition: Bug or Feature?认知中的噪声:缺陷还是特性?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 May;20(3):572-589. doi: 10.1177/17456916241258951. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
10
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over the Frontopolar Cortex Promotes Willingness to Exert Cognitive Effort in a Foraging-Like Sequential Choice Task.额极皮质的非侵入性脑刺激在类似觅食的序列选择任务中促进认知努力的意愿。
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 5;45(10):e0647242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0647-24.2024.