• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生成性叙事背后语义控制的神经动力学

Neural dynamics of semantic control underlying generative storytelling.

作者信息

Rastelli Clara, Greco Antonino, Finocchiaro Chiara, Penazzi Gabriele, Braun Christoph, De Pisapia Nicola

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.

MEG Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Commun Biol. 2025 Mar 28;8(1):513. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07913-3.

DOI:10.1038/s42003-025-07913-3
PMID:40155709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11953393/
Abstract

Storytelling has been pivotal for the transmission of knowledge across human history, yet the role of semantic control and its associated neural dynamics has been poorly investigated. Here, human participants generated stories that were either appropriate (ordinary), novel (random), or balanced (creative), while recording functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Deep language models confirmed participants adherence to task instructions. At the neural level, linguistic and visual areas exhibited neural synchrony across participants regardless of the semantic control level, with parietal and frontal regions being more synchronized during random ideation. Importantly, creative stories were differentiated by a multivariate pattern of neural activity in frontal and fronto-temporo-parietal cortices compared to ordinary and random stories. Crucially, similar brain regions were also encoding the features that distinguished the stories. Moreover, we found specific spatial frequency patterns underlying the modulation of semantic control during story generation, while functional coupling in default, salience, and control networks differentiated creative stories with their controls. Remarkably, the temporal irreversibility between visual and high-level areas was higher during creative ideation, suggesting the enhanced hierarchical structure of causal interactions as a neural signature of creative storytelling. Together, our findings highlight the neural mechanisms underlying the regulation of semantic exploration during narrative ideation.

摘要

在人类历史中,讲故事对于知识的传播至关重要,然而语义控制及其相关神经动力学的作用却鲜有研究。在这里,人类参与者在进行功能磁共振成像(fMRI)记录时生成了合适(普通)、新颖(随机)或平衡(创造性)的故事。深度语言模型证实了参与者遵守任务指令。在神经层面,无论语义控制水平如何,语言和视觉区域在参与者之间都表现出神经同步,在随机构思过程中顶叶和额叶区域的同步性更强。重要的是,与普通和随机故事相比,创造性故事在额叶和额颞顶叶皮层中表现出多变量神经活动模式。至关重要的是,相似的脑区也在编码区分这些故事的特征。此外,我们发现了故事生成过程中语义控制调制背后的特定空间频率模式,而默认、显著和控制网络中的功能耦合将创造性故事与其对照区分开来。值得注意的是,在创造性构思过程中,视觉和高级区域之间的时间不可逆性更高,这表明因果相互作用的层次结构增强是创造性讲故事的神经特征。总之,我们的研究结果突出了叙事构思过程中语义探索调节的神经机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c118/11953393/f2ac00b25bcb/42003_2025_7913_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c118/11953393/1ff74c835494/42003_2025_7913_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c118/11953393/88b73c9bc832/42003_2025_7913_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c118/11953393/63f9e41f16b0/42003_2025_7913_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c118/11953393/c7102ceac6eb/42003_2025_7913_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c118/11953393/f2ac00b25bcb/42003_2025_7913_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c118/11953393/1ff74c835494/42003_2025_7913_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c118/11953393/88b73c9bc832/42003_2025_7913_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c118/11953393/63f9e41f16b0/42003_2025_7913_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c118/11953393/c7102ceac6eb/42003_2025_7913_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c118/11953393/f2ac00b25bcb/42003_2025_7913_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Neural dynamics of semantic control underlying generative storytelling.生成性叙事背后语义控制的神经动力学
Commun Biol. 2025 Mar 28;8(1):513. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07913-3.
2
Creative connections: the neural correlates of semantic relatedness are associated with creativity.创意连接:语义相关性的神经关联与创造力有关。
Commun Biol. 2024 Jul 4;7(1):810. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06493-y.
3
Semantic memory structure mediates the role of brain functional connectivity in creative writing.语义记忆结构介导了大脑功能连接在创造性写作中的作用。
Brain Lang. 2025 May;264:105551. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2025.105551. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
4
Decoding the neural representation of story meanings across languages.跨语言解码故事意义的神经表示。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Dec;38(12):6096-6106. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23814. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
5
Dynamic cycles between brain states during creative storytelling.创造性讲故事过程中大脑状态之间的动态循环。
Neuroimage. 2025 Mar;308:121053. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121053. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
6
Exploring the behavioral and neural correlates of semantic distance in creative writing.探索创意写作中语义距离的行为和神经关联。
Psychophysiology. 2023 May;60(5):e14239. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14239. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
7
Lateral and medial prefrontal contributions to emotion generation by semantic elaboration during episodic encoding.在情景编码过程中,外侧和内侧前额叶通过语义加工对情绪产生的贡献。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Feb;17(1):143-157. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0468-6.
8
Neural representations of noncentral events during narrative encoding predict subsequent story ending originality.叙事编码过程中非核心事件的神经表征可预测后续故事结局的新颖性。
Sci Adv. 2025 Apr 25;11(17):eadu5251. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu5251. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
9
Creative constraints: Brain activity and network dynamics underlying semantic interference during idea production.创造性限制:创意生成过程中语义干扰背后的大脑活动和网络动态
Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
10
Default network contributions to episodic and semantic processing during divergent creative thinking: A representational similarity analysis.默认网络在发散性创造性思维过程中对情景和语义处理的贡献:基于代表性相似性分析。
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 1;209:116499. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116499. Epub 2019 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Conversational content is organized across multiple timescales in the brain.大脑中的对话内容是在多个时间尺度上组织起来的。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02231-4.
2
Cyberdelics: Virtual reality hallucinations modulate cognitive-affective processes.网络迷幻剂:虚拟现实幻觉调节认知情感过程。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2025 Dec;27(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/19585969.2025.2499459. Epub 2025 May 23.
3
Neural representations of noncentral events during narrative encoding predict subsequent story ending originality.

本文引用的文献

1
The temporal asymmetry of cortical dynamics as a signature of brain states.皮质动力学的时间不对称性作为脑状态的特征。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 16;14(1):24271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74649-1.
2
An entropy modulation theory of creative exploration.创造性探索的熵调制理论。
Psychol Rev. 2025 Jan;132(1):239-251. doi: 10.1037/rev0000511. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
3
Macroscale brain states support the control of semantic cognition.宏观脑状态支持语义认知的控制。
叙事编码过程中非核心事件的神经表征可预测后续故事结局的新颖性。
Sci Adv. 2025 Apr 25;11(17):eadu5251. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu5251. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
Commun Biol. 2024 Aug 1;7(1):926. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06630-7.
4
Narrative as active inference: an integrative account of cognitive and social functions in adaptation.作为主动推理的叙事:适应中认知与社会功能的综合阐述
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 6;15:1345480. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345480. eCollection 2024.
5
Default mode network electrophysiological dynamics and causal role in creative thinking.静息态默认网络电生理动力学及其在创造性思维中的因果作用。
Brain. 2024 Oct 3;147(10):3409-3425. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae199.
6
Semantic representations in inferior frontal and lateral temporal cortex during picture naming, reading, and repetition.下额前皮质和外侧颞叶皮质在图片命名、阅读和重复任务中的语义表现。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Feb 1;45(2):e26603. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26603.
7
Measuring semantic memory using associative and dissociative retrieval tasks.使用联想和分离检索任务测量语义记忆。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Feb 7;11(2):231208. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231208. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
Cultivating creativity: predictive brains and the enlightened room problem.培养创造力:预测性大脑与开明的房间问题。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20220415. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0415. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
9
Inner speech as language process and cognitive tool.内言语:语言过程和认知工具
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Dec;27(12):1180-1193. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.014. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
10
Non-reversibility outperforms functional connectivity in characterisation of brain states in MEG data.非可逆性在脑磁图数据中脑状态特征刻画方面优于功能连接。
Neuroimage. 2023 Aug 1;276:120186. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120186. Epub 2023 Jun 1.