• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吃力不讨好:准确数据的重要性。

Learning the hard way: the importance of accurate data.

机构信息

Academic Department of Medical and Surgical Gastroenterology and Intensive Care, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2012 Aug;14(8):1015-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02981.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02981.x
PMID:22329923
Abstract

AIM

The outcome of surgery for colorectal cancer in each unit in the UK is collated by the National Bowel Cancer Audit Project (NBOCAP). In 2008-2009 our unit had a raw 30-day postoperative mortality close to the national average, but when it was nationally adjusted it appeared to be an outlier. The purpose of this study was to identify reasons for this disparity.

METHOD

All records were obtained for patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer over the 2 years. Data submitted to NBOCAP to determine adjusted rates were compared with actual data.

RESULTS

There were major discordances between submitted and actual data for American Society of Anesthesiology grades and timing of surgery. This explained why the unit appeared to be an outlier.

CONCLUSION

There is increasing emphasis on outcome of health service delivery, which has important implications. Submission of correct data is essential if objective comparison is to be made on which to base decisions on service delivery among units and within health regions.

摘要

目的

英国各单位的结直肠癌手术结果由国家肠道癌症审核项目(NBOCAP)汇总。在 2008-2009 年,我们单位的术后 30 天死亡率接近全国平均水平,但在全国调整后,它似乎是一个异常值。本研究的目的是确定造成这种差异的原因。

方法

获取过去两年中接受结直肠癌手术的所有患者的记录。将提交给 NBOCAP 以确定调整后比率的数据与实际数据进行比较。

结果

美国麻醉医师协会分级和手术时间的提交数据与实际数据之间存在重大差异。这解释了为什么该单位似乎是一个异常值。

结论

越来越重视卫生服务提供的结果,这具有重要意义。如果要在单位之间和卫生区域内的服务提供决策中进行客观比较,就必须提交正确的数据。

相似文献

1
Learning the hard way: the importance of accurate data.吃力不讨好:准确数据的重要性。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Aug;14(8):1015-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02981.x.
2
A colorectal perspective on voluntary submission of outcome data to clinical registries.从结直肠角度看向临床注册机构自愿提交结果数据。
Br J Surg. 2011 Jan;98(1):132-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7301. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
3
The National Bowel Cancer Audit Project: what do trusts think of the National Bowel Cancer Audit and how can it be improved?国家结直肠癌审计项目:信托机构如何看待国家结直肠癌审计,以及如何改进?
Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Mar;15(1):53-9. doi: 10.1007/s10151-010-0661-5. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
4
Evaluating operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: ASA and POSSUM-based predictive models.评估结直肠癌手术的手术风险:基于美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)和朴茨茅斯评分系统(POSSUM)的预测模型
Surg Oncol. 2004 Aug-Nov;13(2-3):83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2004.08.006.
5
The national bowel cancer audit project: the impact of organisational structure on outcome in operative bowel cancer within the United Kingdom.全国结直肠癌审计项目:组织结构对英国结直肠癌手术治疗结果的影响。
Surg Oncol. 2011 Jun;20(2):e72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
6
Colorectal cancer surgery of octogenarians in Hong Kong: who will survive?香港地区 80 岁以上老年人的结直肠癌手术:谁能存活?
Hong Kong Med J. 2011 Oct;17(5):358-64.
7
Single measures of performance do not reflect overall institutional quality in colorectal cancer surgery.单一的绩效指标并不能反映结直肠癌手术的整体机构质量。
Gut. 2013 Mar;62(3):423-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301489. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
8
Prediction of postoperative mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.老年结直肠癌患者术后死亡率的预测
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Jun;49(6):816-24. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0523-4.
9
Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.丹麦结直肠癌的生存情况
Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4428.
10
Involvement of surgical trainees in surgery for colorectal cancer and their effect on outcome.外科实习生参与结直肠癌手术及其对手术结果的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Oct;10(8):837-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01465.x. Epub 2008 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Variations in surgical management from a national bowel cancer screening programme.国家肠癌筛查计划中手术管理的差异。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;4(4):302-307. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100335. Epub 2013 Jul 6.
2
Population-based cohort study comparing 30- and 90-day institutional mortality rates after colorectal surgery.基于人群的队列研究比较了结直肠手术后 30 天和 90 天的机构死亡率。
Br J Surg. 2013 Dec;100(13):1810-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9318.
3
Use of CT colonography in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
CT 结肠成像在英国结直肠癌筛查计划中的应用。
Gut. 2014 Jun;63(6):964-73. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304697. Epub 2013 Aug 16.