Borowski D W, Ratcliffe A A, Bharathan B, Gunn A, Bradburn D M, Mills S J, Wilson R G, Kelly S B
Department of Surgery, North Tyneside General Hospital, Rake Lane, North Shields, Tyne & Wear, UK.
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Oct;10(8):837-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01465.x. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
Surgical training in the UK is undergoing substantial changes. This study assessed: 1) the training opportunities available to trainees in operations for colorectal cancer, 2) the effect of colorectal specialization on training, and 3) the effect of consultant supervision on anastomotic complications, postoperative stay, operative mortality and 5-year survival.
Unadjusted and adjusted comparisons of outcomes were made for unsupervised trainees, supervised trainees and consultants as the primary surgeon in 7411 operated patients included in the Northern Region Colorectal Cancer Audit between 1998 and 2002.
Surgery was performed in 656 (8.8%) patients by unsupervised trainees and in 1578 (21.3%) patients by supervised trainees. Unsupervised operations reduced from 182 (12.4%) in 1998 to 82 (6.1%) in 2002 (P < 0.001). Consultants with a colorectal specialist interest were more likely than nonspecialists to be present at surgical resections (OR 1.35, 1.12-1.63, P = 0.001) and to provide supervised training (OR 1.34, 1.17-1.53, P < 0.001). Patients operated on by unsupervised trainees were more often high-risk patients, however, consultant presence was not significantly associated with operative mortality (OR 0.83, 0.63-1.09, P = 0.186) or survival (HR 1.02, 0.92-1.13, P = 0.735) in risk-adjusted analysis. Supervised trainees had a case-mix similar to consultants, with shorter length of hospital stay (11.4 vs 12.4 days, P < 0.001), but similar mortality (OR 0.90, 0.71-1.16, 0.418) and survival (HR 0.96, 0.89-1.05, P = 0.378).
One third of patients were operated on by trainees, who were more likely to perform supervised resections in colorectal teams. There was no difference in anastomotic leaks rates, operative mortality or survival between unsupervised trainees, supervised trainees and consultants when case-mix adjustment was applied. This study would suggest that there is considerable underused training capacity available.
英国的外科培训正在经历重大变革。本研究评估了:1)结直肠癌手术学员可获得的培训机会;2)结直肠专科化对培训的影响;3)顾问监督对吻合口并发症、术后住院时间、手术死亡率和5年生存率的影响。
对1998年至2002年纳入北部地区结直肠癌审计的7411例手术患者中,由无监督学员、有监督学员和顾问作为主刀医生的手术结果进行了未调整和调整后的比较。
无监督学员为656例(8.8%)患者实施了手术,有监督学员为1578例(21.3%)患者实施了手术。无监督手术从1998年的182例(12.4%)降至2002年的82例(6.1%)(P<0.001)。对结直肠有专科兴趣的顾问比非专科顾问更有可能参与手术切除(比值比1.35,1.12 - 1.63,P = 0.001)并提供有监督的培训(比值比1.34,1.17 - 1.53,P<0.001)。然而,无监督学员所手术的患者多为高危患者,在风险调整分析中,顾问的参与与手术死亡率(比值比0.83,0.63 - 1.09,P = 0.186)或生存率(风险比1.02,0.92 - 1.13,P = 0.735)无显著关联。有监督学员的病例组合与顾问相似,住院时间较短(11.4天对12.4天,P<0.001),但死亡率(比值比0.90,0.71 - 1.16,P = 0.418)和生存率(风险比0.96,0.89 - 1.05,P = 0.378)相似。
三分之一的患者由学员实施手术,学员在结直肠团队中更有可能进行有监督的切除手术。在进行病例组合调整后,无监督学员、有监督学员和顾问之间的吻合口漏率、手术死亡率或生存率没有差异。本研究表明存在大量未充分利用的培训能力。