Suppr超能文献

评估循环肿瘤细胞和血清标志物对转移性乳腺癌无进展生存期的预测作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Assessment of circulating tumor cells and serum markers for progression-free survival prediction in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective observational study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Feb 13;14(1):R29. doi: 10.1186/bcr3114.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Circulating tumor cells (CTC) have been recently proposed as a new dynamic blood marker whose positivity at baseline is a prognostic factor and whose changes under treatment are correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer patients. However, serum marker levels are also used for the same purpose, and no clear comparison has been reported to date.

METHODS

The IC 2006-04 enrolled prospectively 267 metastatic breast cancer patients treated by first line chemotherapy and confirmed that CTC levels are an independent prognostic factor for PFS and overall survival (OS). A secondary pre-planned endpoint was to compare prospectively the positivity rates and the value of CTC (CellSearch®), of serum tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 15.3 (CA 15-3), CYFRA 21-1), and of serum non-tumor markers (lactate deshydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase (ALP)) at baseline and under treatment for PFS prediction, independently from the other known prognostic factors, using univariate analyses and concordance indexes.

RESULTS

A total of 90% of the patients had at least one elevated blood marker. Blood markers were correlated with poor performance status, high number of metastatic sites and with each other. In particular, CYFRA 21-1, a marker usually used in lung cancer, was elevated in 65% of patients. A total of 86% of patients had either CA 15-3 and/or CYFRA 21-1 elevated at baseline. Each serum marker was associated, when elevated at baseline, with a significantly shorter PFS. Serum marker changes during treatment, assessed either between baseline and week 3 or between baseline and weeks 6 to 9, were significantly associated with PFS, as reported for CTC. Concordance indexes comparison showed no clear superiority of any of the serum marker or CTC for PFS prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

For the purpose of PFS prediction by measuring blood marker changes during treatment, currently available blood-derived markers (CTC and serum markers) had globally similar performances. Besides CEA and CA 15-3, CYFRA 21-1 is commonly elevated in metastatic breast cancer and has a strong prognostic value.

摘要

简介

循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)最近被提议作为一种新的动态血液标志物,其基线阳性是一个预后因素,而治疗过程中的变化与转移性乳腺癌患者的无进展生存期(PFS)相关。然而,血清标志物水平也用于相同的目的,迄今为止尚未报告明确的比较。

方法

IC 2006-04 前瞻性纳入 267 例接受一线化疗治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者,并证实 CTC 水平是 PFS 和总生存期(OS)的独立预后因素。次要的预先计划终点是前瞻性比较 CTC(CellSearch®)、血清肿瘤标志物(癌胚抗原(CEA)、癌抗原 15.3(CA 15-3)、CYFRA 21-1)和血清非肿瘤标志物(乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP))在基线和治疗期间的阳性率和对 PFS 的预测价值,独立于其他已知的预后因素,使用单变量分析和一致性指数。

结果

90%的患者至少有一个升高的血液标志物。血液标志物与较差的表现状态、转移部位数量较多以及彼此之间相关。特别是,通常用于肺癌的标志物 CYFRA 21-1 在 65%的患者中升高。基线时,共有 86%的患者同时或单独升高 CA 15-3 和/或 CYFRA 21-1。基线时升高的每种血清标志物均与显著较短的 PFS 相关。治疗期间的血清标志物变化,评估基线与第 3 周之间或基线与第 6 至 9 周之间,与 PFS 显著相关,与 CTC 相似。一致性指数比较表明,任何血清标志物或 CTC 用于 PFS 预测均无明显优势。

结论

为了通过测量治疗期间血液标志物变化来预测 PFS,目前可用的血液衍生标志物(CTC 和血清标志物)具有总体相似的性能。除了 CEA 和 CA 15-3 之外,CYFRA 21-1 在转移性乳腺癌中也经常升高,具有很强的预后价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验