• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查高危人群早期肺癌:一项荟萃分析]

[Screening of early lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography in high-risk populations: a meta-analysis].

作者信息

Yao Yan-wen, Yuan Dong-mei, Lü Yan-ling, Li Yu-feng, Song Yong

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Diseases, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Nov 1;91(40):2819-23.

PMID:22333541
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the values of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in the screening of high-risk populations for early lung cancer through a meta-analysis of the relevant literature.

METHODS

PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane and other databases were searched with key words. And the studies were selected by the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The baseline data were collected and analyzed by statistical software.

RESULTS

Ten random controlled trials (RCTs) were selected. Compared to the chest X ray (CXR) screening and no screening controls, LDCT screening had an odds ratio (OR) of 3.705, 95%CI 3.527 - 3.891. And in the subgroup analysis, a higher number of stage I lung cancer was detected (OR 4.464, 95%CI 2.860 - 6.969) by LDCT. Moreover, LDCT screening showed an increased detection of adenocarcinoma in lung cancer (OR 4.652, 95%CI 2.877 - 7.522).

CONCLUSION

LDCT is superior to CXR in the early detection of lung cancer, especially stage I and adenocarcinoma.

摘要

目的

通过对相关文献的荟萃分析,探讨低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)在早期肺癌高危人群筛查中的价值。

方法

以关键词检索PubMed、EBSCO、Cochrane等数据库。并根据纳入和排除标准筛选研究。采用统计软件收集并分析基线数据。

结果

选取了10项随机对照试验(RCT)。与胸部X线(CXR)筛查和未筛查对照组相比,LDCT筛查的优势比(OR)为3.705,95%置信区间(CI)为3.527 - 3.891。在亚组分析中,LDCT检测到的I期肺癌数量更多(OR 4.464,95%CI 2.860 - 6.969)。此外,LDCT筛查显示肺癌中腺癌的检出率增加(OR 4.652,95%CI 2.877 - 7.522)。

结论

在肺癌的早期检测中,LDCT优于CXR,尤其是在I期和腺癌方面。

相似文献

1
[Screening of early lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography in high-risk populations: a meta-analysis].[低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查高危人群早期肺癌:一项荟萃分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Nov 1;91(40):2819-23.
2
A meta-analysis: is low-dose computed tomography a superior method for risky lung cancers screening population?一项荟萃分析:低剂量计算机断层扫描对于高危肺癌筛查人群而言是一种更优的方法吗?
Clin Respir J. 2016 May;10(3):333-41. doi: 10.1111/crj.12222. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
3
Long-Term Follow-up Results of the DANTE Trial, a Randomized Study of Lung Cancer Screening with Spiral Computed Tomography.DANTE 试验的长期随访结果,一项使用螺旋 CT 进行肺癌筛查的随机研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 May 15;191(10):1166-75. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201408-1475OC.
4
Final results of the Lung Screening Study, a randomized feasibility study of spiral CT versus chest X-ray screening for lung cancer.肺癌筛查研究的最终结果,一项关于螺旋CT与胸部X光筛查肺癌的随机可行性研究。
Lung Cancer. 2005 Jan;47(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.06.007.
5
Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the baseline findings of randomized controlled trials.低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌:随机对照试验基线研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Aug;5(8):1233-9. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181e0b977.
6
Do we know enough about the effect of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer on survival to act? A systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.对于低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌对生存率的影响,我们了解得是否足够充分从而采取行动?一项对随机对照试验的系统评价、荟萃分析和网状荟萃分析。
Diagn Progn Res. 2019 Nov 28;3:23. doi: 10.1186/s41512-019-0067-4. eCollection 2019.
7
Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma in an asbestos-exposed population: baseline results of a prospective, nonrandomized feasibility trial--an Alpe-adria Thoracic Oncology Multidisciplinary Group Study (ATOM 002).石棉暴露人群中肺癌和胸膜间皮瘤的低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查:一项前瞻性、非随机可行性试验的基线结果——阿尔卑斯-亚得里亚胸科肿瘤多学科研究组研究(ATOM 002)
Oncologist. 2007 Oct;12(10):1215-24. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-10-1215.
8
Do we know enough about the effect of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer on mortality to act? An updated systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials 2017 to 2021.我们对低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌对死亡率的影响了解得足够多,可以采取行动了吗?2017年至2021年随机对照试验的最新系统评价、荟萃分析和网状荟萃分析。
Diagn Progn Res. 2023 Dec 11;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41512-023-00162-0.
9
Computed tomography screening for lung cancer: has it finally arrived? Implications of the national lung screening trial.计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌:它终于来了吗?国家肺癌筛查试验的意义。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 10;31(8):1002-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.3110. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
10
[Effectiveness Evaluation of Low-dose Spiral Computed Tomography 
for Lung Cancer Screening in Minhang District of Shanghai].[低剂量螺旋计算机断层扫描对上海市闵行区肺癌筛查的效果评估]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2024 Jan 20;27(1):13-24. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2023.102.46.