Department of Acute Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal, PO Box 4956, Nydalen NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.
BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Feb 14;12:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-9.
Reliable suicide statistics are a prerequisite for suicide monitoring and prevention. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of suicide statistics through a systematic review of the international literature.
We searched for relevant publications in EMBASE, Ovid Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library up to October 2010. In addition, we screened related studies and reference lists of identified studies. We included studies published in English, German, French, Spanish, Norwegian, Swedish and Danish that assessed the reliability of suicide statistics. We excluded case reports, editorials, letters, comments, abstracts and statistical analyses. All three authors independently screened the abstracts, and then the relevant full-text articles. Disagreements were resolved through consensus.
The primary search yielded 127 potential studies, of which 31 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. The included studies were published between 1963 and 2009. Twenty were from Europe, seven from North America, two from Asia and two from Oceania. The manner of death had been re-evaluated in 23 studies (40-3,993 cases), and there were six registry studies (195-17,412 cases) and two combined registry and re-evaluation studies. The study conclusions varied, from findings of fairly reliable to poor suicide statistics. Thirteen studies reported fairly reliable suicide statistics or under-reporting of 0-10%. Of the 31 studies during the 46-year period, 52% found more than 10% under-reporting, and 39% found more than 30% under-reporting or poor suicide statistics. Eleven studies reassessed a nationwide representative sample, although these samples were limited to suicide within subgroups. Only two studies compared data from two countries.
The main finding was that there is a lack of systematic assessment of the reliability of suicide statistics. Few studies have been done, and few countries have been covered. The findings support the general under-reporting of suicide. In particular, nationwide studies and comparisons between countries are lacking.
可靠的自杀统计数据是进行自杀监测和预防的前提条件。本研究的目的是通过系统评价国际文献来评估自杀统计数据的可靠性。
我们在 EMBASE、Ovid Medline、PubMed、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane Library 中检索了截至 2010 年 10 月的相关文献。此外,我们还筛选了已确定研究的相关研究和参考文献列表。我们纳入了以英文、德文、法文、西班牙文、挪威文、瑞典文和丹麦文发表的评估自杀统计数据可靠性的研究。我们排除了病例报告、社论、信件、评论、摘要和统计分析。所有三位作者均独立筛选摘要,然后筛选相关的全文文章。通过协商解决分歧。
初步搜索产生了 127 项潜在研究,其中 31 项研究符合纳入标准并纳入最终综述。纳入的研究发表于 1963 年至 2009 年。20 项来自欧洲,7 项来自北美,2 项来自亚洲,2 项来自大洋洲。23 项研究(40-3993 例)重新评估了死因,6 项为登记研究(195-17412 例),2 项为登记和重新评估相结合的研究。研究结论各不相同,从相当可靠的自杀统计数据到较差的自杀统计数据都有。13 项研究报告了相当可靠的自杀统计数据或 0-10%的漏报率。在这 31 项研究的 46 年期间,有 52%的研究发现漏报率超过 10%,39%的研究发现漏报率超过 30%或自杀统计数据较差。11 项研究重新评估了全国代表性样本,尽管这些样本仅限于自杀的亚组。只有两项研究比较了两个国家的数据。
主要发现是缺乏对自杀统计数据可靠性的系统评估。所做的研究很少,涵盖的国家也很少。研究结果支持自杀总体上报不足的结论。特别是缺乏全国性的研究和国家间的比较。